Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.
Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
Thank you.
No really, thank you.
Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a #
# - Creates a numbered bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the #).
Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
--~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
Remember to delete any unused images from deleted articles and, if necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Make sure to delete any broken redirects created as well.
To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.
If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.
To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.
Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.
If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions.This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty.Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept.You have been warned.
Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.
Delete. See comment below.--Garionepsilon 07:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Kerkill Nothing worth keeping right now, in my opinion. Start over from the beginning. --MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 20:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Complete Crap I couldn't even bear to read past the opening paragraph. *Flumpa 03:33, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments
I'm really fed up with struggling to get this into shape. I can't think of anything funny to put into it, and it's edited so often my watch page is amass with it. Please somebody get rid of it and put me out of my misery.--Garionepsilon 07:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep It needs chopping with a big chopper, but it's got some stuff worth keeping. MrNFork you! 17:50, May 15
Keep There's some good. I'd suggest locking so only registered users can edit, then follow that up with a clean-up. --MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 02:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Actually, do the same thing to the Hilary Clinton article. That really needs it. --MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 02:15, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep It's a headbut. When you smack someone with your head! This article is not bad enough to delete for me. Needs more work, but I can see people working on this more... MrNFork you! 17:46, May 15
Delete
Delete, it's a mess and the IP is inactive with the page--— SirSycamore (talk) 10:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Are you shitting me? Fucking KEEP! This is almost as funny as Guy Gets Crazy, if not even more so! --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 04:11, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Here's a summary: satan wookiee waffles lol. « Arotenbe « aka arotenbe, AaronR, etc. « Now what did I do? « 07:08, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
I think it's a good stub. It's funny. And it's short, but I fully believe a deleted page is not funnier than it. The laws of going with whichever option is funniest means it should totally be kept. •Spang•☃•talk• 19:42, 14 May 2008
Keep This was one of the first pages I read when I got here... Um, why? Um... Well. Um. Look over there, it's a sausage. Also, Dexter voted keep! MrNFork you! 21:16, May 14
Keep - Like I said last time, it looks more like an Illogicopedia article to me. But, I'm happy to keep such articles here. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 08:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. I Found this while looking for child pornography through the random page button, and it doesn't seem to have much going for it (Bonner) (Talk) May 14, 15:25
Delete. Heh, interesting. I checked the previous delete vote for this page. The words "It's A Good Idea, Give It A Chance" were placed in the "keep" section by one Bonner. Have you become jaded man? Anyway, I think it is a crappy little stub that isn't likely to get expanded. Famine said he'd expand it on the last vote, and nothing came of that... --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee15:36, May 14
Very Weak Keep The political career bit is crap and need a rewrite but the rest is passable.--Count of Monkey Crisco 02:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Not that bad. Could do with some pictures and editing, but nothing drastic. ~ 15:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete
(Pooped by Cajek). I'm not sure if Cajek appreciates the importance of putting your finger in a dyke, but this article is a bit of a nothing, with nothing really of much value. MrNFork you! 19:24, May 11
Delete. Er, this really is dull, and what's the point of the pensions minister of Bhutan thing?. If it is kept, strong rewrite tag. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee08:33, May 12
Keep OK, so it's kinda puerile, but what can you expect!?! Also looking at what links to this page [1] (LOT of links) I think it's best to hang onto this. Fart and Farting link here, and I feel that what we would get if this were deleted might smell worse. I will tidy this up if it's kept. MrNFork you! 14:31, May 11
Eh Not delete-worthy --SirDJ~Irreverent 08:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep The page could always be protected against vandals, could use improvement, but not too bad as is.Simsilikesims 16:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete - This article isn't funny, keeps getting vandalised by brainless IPs, and it's now just becoming a waste of space. I've been watching this page for weeks trying to keep it into shape, but I can see now that it's not really doing anything. --AAA! (AAAA) 12:40, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Puerile and pointless. Given that it's a topic one would expect to find in any joke encyclopedia, I'm surprised the article is so crap. The fake Periodic Table is kind of funny, but the rest of it is irredeemably worthless. Herbert the Giraffe 19:42, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Weak Keep - But only if it gets rewritten. If not, it's coming back here. Heck, I might try to rewrite it myself. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 13:27, May. 15, 2008
Delete
Delete Perhaps one of you American types can tell me this has some worth, but I see none. MrNFork you! 10:58, May 10
Kerkill "Missoura" is just a country way of pronouncing “Missouri.” This is just a bland take-off of the state of Missouri. Not worth keeping, in my opinion. --MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 19:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.
Delete. I Found this 
Very Weak Keep The political career bit is crap and need a rewrite but the rest is passable.--
