Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/old

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 35: Line 35:
 
{|{{purtytable}}
 
{|{{purtytable}}
 
||'''Keep'''||
 
||'''Keep'''||
+
*'''Somewhat redeemable.''' Maybe the end result wouldn't be particularly funny, but with length and a "statement of facts" sort of sense of humour, it could be okay.
 
|-
 
|-
 
||'''Delete'''||
 
||'''Delete'''||
Line 42: Line 42:
 
||'''Comments'''||
 
||'''Comments'''||
 
|}
 
|}
  +
 
==[[BlackBerry]] ==
 
==[[BlackBerry]] ==
 
{|{{purtytable}}
 
{|{{purtytable}}

Revision as of 19:29, September 23, 2007

Shortcut:
{{{1}}}
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

Rules and procedures:

  1. If you're too lazy to read the deletion policy, please, at least, carefully read this list of rules.
    1. But seriously, read the deletion policy.
    2. Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
    3. Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
  2. If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
    1. Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.
    2. Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
    3. Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
  3. If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
    1. Thank you.
    2. No really, thank you.
    3. Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
    4. Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a #
      1. # - Creates a numbered bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the #).
      2. Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
      3. --~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
  4. Do not revert edits of the administrators.
  5. If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month or you will get a bollocking.
  6. If you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith, do not remove anything from VFD; doing so will get you banned for a very long time.
Un-vfd
Don't let your articles turn to trash

Pages for Deletion

Zombiebaronvs.Braydie

Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nail bat before we tear our hair out in frustration. This also applies to Featured Articles and Uncyclopedia In-Jokes.


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages):


Notes for Administrators:

  • Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
  • Remember to delete any unused images from deleted articles and, if necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Make sure to delete any broken redirects created as well.
  • To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.
  • If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.


Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.

If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions. This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the 🔒 Closed nomination H T D Oldvfd tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.

Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.


Secret_Underground_Bunker

Keep
Delete
  • Very unfunny and short.Barcode711 19:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Eh - It looks like the page doesn't exist nor it was ever created--Sir Manforman CUN 19:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • What the hell, man? I saw it on QuickVFD and it was Keep...but it's goddamn awful. Here's a direct link, because for some reason it doesn't work: http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Secret_underground_bunker
    • Whatever the case may be, it's still too new and already ICU tagged. Ineligible. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 19:27, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Jibbajabba

Keep
  • Somewhat redeemable. Maybe the end result wouldn't be particularly funny, but with length and a "statement of facts" sort of sense of humour, it could be okay.
Delete
Comments

BlackBerry

Keep
Delete
  • Delete--Sir Manforman CUN 17:19, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Too listy and not enough funny. --RandomDie 19:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Smacktard

Keep
Delete
Comments

Pubbians

Keep
Delete
Comments


Kyle gometz

Keep
Delete
Comments

Empathy

Keep
Delete
  • Nom & Delete - Too listy and not much potential --BonSig.png (Bonner) Icons-flag-gb (Talk) 12:02, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Kill See above Elassint 17:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments


Melinda Gates

Keep
Delete
Comments

Jury

Keep
Delete
  • Nom & Delete God no --BonSig.png (Bonner) Icons-flag-gb (Talk) 11:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • delete. Not sure why it has the 'great idea' tag on it either. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Under user (talk • contribs) diff
  • The Jury rules that this article must be deleted--Sir Manforman CUN 12:55, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Kerkill Just crap. --Dexter111344 16:06, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Thomas Shithead

Keep
Delete
Comments

Vorderman

Keep
Delete
Comments

Smokey on O'Reilly transcript

Keep
  • Keep. Are we reading the same page? Lines like "So you think hard working Christian Americans should be deprived the right to let their fires burn?" are too funny to not be untrue. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:41, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and throw in a picture. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep Although I hope we don't suddenly end up with several more O'Reilly transcript articles. Quadzilla99 04:14, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep --Aljolson Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson 04:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. I didn't see anything that bad here. I actually chckled once as well. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:58, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Meh, it's alright. --Dexter111344 16:04, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete O'Reilly: Look, most times when an article is bad it doesn't survive. Those are just the facts! Bear: Grrrrrrrrrrrrrraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllll O'Reilly is then eaten by bear. Note the lack of humor in this little tidbit. Imagine that, minus some of the particulars, and an entire damn page, and then you've got this page in a nutshell.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:39, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Aljolson Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson 03:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Я

Keep
Delete
Comments

Hand Egg

Keep
Delete
  • Delete I found this while looking through the database for Chuck Norris references to remove. This is one of them. While he is only mentioned in passing, the article itself is yet another example of how not to write an article. Through woefully unoriginal means, it names quite a few if not all irritating Internet memes, in a list no less. Before it does this, it goes through the motions of half-assed article writing: scattershot plotting, pseudo-anti-American sentiment, etcetera. Add to that a pathetically stupid concept, and this isn't worth keeping.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:21, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 00:52, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Aljolson Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson 02:25, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Quadzilla99 04:00, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Scrap --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 04:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. A nothing article. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Reasons to become an atheist/the funny version

Keep
  • It's no worse than Reasons to become an Atheist. No better, neither. Damn atheists...always writing things. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Not too bad. People don't tend to notice subpages as much as their main pages, so I tend to vote to keep most subpages. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:41, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Harriet Miers

Keep
  • Keep It's pretty funny. And besides, pages about Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky aren't very topical either. Err... well... Monica Lewinsky isn't... Bill still is. People still remember Harriet Miers. And she's the only groupie Bush has. Don't take that away from him. Also, since it hasn't changed since the two previous VFD's, it is technically ineligible. --Dexter111344 02:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Starts off a bit weak, but the end is funny. What Dexter said about the topicality, too. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:21, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Not too bad. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:27, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I've seen much, much worse around here. Quadzilla99 03:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Meh, it's not bad. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:49, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete - This had potential when it was first created, but now that Harriet Miers has faded into the dust, it no longer has potential and a good rewrite won't ever be able to happen--Sir Manforman CUN 22:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Aljolson Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson 01:03, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • I don't feel strongly enough to vote either way, though I would suggest if this nomination results in a keep that someone up the rewrite to medium level. However, I must point out {{wikipedia}}, which rather helps one when they don't get the article. I've put a couple on, to good response. Also, I suggest looking at the talk page of an article to see if it's previously been VFD'd fruitlessly recently.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

I just slam on the keyboard and magic happens

Keep
Delete
Comments

Archived VFD Discussions

Template:VFDarchive

Personal tools
In other languages
projects