Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/old

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(D)
(D)
Line 121: Line 121:
 
*'''Delete''' Destroy Dis Doo-Doo [[User:Kip the Dip|Dip da Dip]] 19:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete''' Destroy Dis Doo-Doo [[User:Kip the Dip|Dip da Dip]] 19:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 
*'''-elete''' --[[User:Dexter111344|Dexter111344]] 20:25, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 
*'''-elete''' --[[User:Dexter111344|Dexter111344]] 20:25, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
|-
+
*I was hoping to read a tale about a drifting tofu delivery boy. Instead I read this random ''whateveritis''. Even Itsuki wouldn't think this was cool. {{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 00:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 
||'''Comments'''||
 
||'''Comments'''||
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 00:42, July 31, 2007

Shortcut:
{{{1}}}
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

Rules and procedures:

  1. If you're too lazy to read the deletion policy, please, at least, carefully read this list of rules.
    1. But seriously, read the deletion policy.
    2. Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
    3. Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
  2. If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
    1. Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.
    2. Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
    3. Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
  3. If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
    1. Thank you.
    2. No really, thank you.
    3. Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
    4. Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a #
      1. # - Creates a numbered bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the #).
      2. Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
      3. --~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
  4. Do not revert edits of the administrators.
  5. If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month or you will get a bollocking.
  6. If you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith, do not remove anything from VFD; doing so will get you banned for a very long time.
Un-vfd
Don't let your articles turn to trash

Pages for Deletion

Zombiebaronvs.Braydie

Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nail bat before we tear our hair out in frustration. This also applies to Featured Articles and Uncyclopedia In-Jokes.


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages):


Notes for Administrators:

  • Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
  • Remember to delete any unused images from deleted articles and, if necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Make sure to delete any broken redirects created as well.
  • To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.
  • If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.


Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.

If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions. This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the 🔒 Closed nomination H T D Oldvfd tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.

Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.


I'm sorry I haven't a clue

Keep
Delete
Comments

Bag

Keep
  • Keep Humour by means of extreme stating-the-obviousness. I reverted all the recent rubbish (ironically back to its 2005 days...) --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. The oatmeal of obviousness can be used in moderation to cleanse the palate of comedy. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Baleet --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 22:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Fairly thin. Defines a bag as "Made for shitting on." Huff --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 22:55, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Television

Keep
Delete
  • Delete An ugly template whose purpose is already served by {{UnMedia}}. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 22:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Yecch! Looks more huge and dated than the Betamax itself. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 22:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 22:18, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The CBC is always Channel 2. It's the only channel we get. Canadian remote controls only have Power and Volume buttons. True story. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Make mine a delete, if somebody includes the rest of the good channels into the UnMedia template and volunteers to take all the inclusions away after it's deleted. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
What about the television category. Isn't that enough? If that's too much, how about a telev category? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Blaming Suicide

Keep
Delete
  • Old stub --General Insineratehymn 22:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)\
  • Delete. Extremely cliche follow through on a somewhat amusing concept. I liked this article more before I clicked on it. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 22:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Stubby, listy, introduction is a rephrasing of subject. Image caption is vanity. Chop --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 22:59, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I don't think the first line is even make-sensable. (P.S. - Bravo Ins!) --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:14, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Epic Movie

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Yes, this is a concept worthy of writing. However, it should not be written like this. Placing a rewrite tag on it is not the answer, because most writers don't even spare those categories a passing glance. If deletion is the only way to draw people's attention to this article's need to be rewritten, so be it. And it needs to be rewritten. "In January of 2007, a release of the Epic Movie sequel opened in theaters. The sequel was directed by Mel Gibson" is an example of the dumbness exuded by this article.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • Delete --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 21:49, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Going to surprise you by voting delete. It's just pure random - maybe there are glimmers of what might have been in the last paragraph, but barely enough to even give you the idea for a rewrite. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:10, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per Strange but untrue. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

The Sandman

Keep
Delete
  • Delete The crappiness of this article is undeniable. Somehow, Dr. Phil is a rapper. This conept alone makes it worth killing. But, if not, consider this: it is random, with random numbers and random humor, it is all over the place perspective-wise, and "The Sandman has made such valuable musical contributions such as "Who the Fuck was That", recorded in early 2000" is arguably the funniest one in the article.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:30, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Quite horrible, really. ----OEJ 19:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 21:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete From the first edit, looks like it was vanity hastily reattributed. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Plan 11 from Outer Space

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Imageless, short, and unimaginative. Short story shorter, this is unneeded, and indeed, unwanted.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:24, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Never says what Plan 11 entailed, which may be the joke. If so, it is not well done at all -- misses nearly all openings to satirize pointlessness. ----OEJ 19:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

D

Keep
  • Weak keep Some funny bits, if a little random. Also; I know it's a pathetic excuse, but it would make a big redlink hole in the middle of the keyboard! --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:56, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete Another crappy D-related article. This one is just a long list of words with minimal content. Plus, Undictionary:D is quite long enough already.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:21, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Semi-coherent rambling, for the most part, and underdeveloped. ----OEJ 19:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Destroy Dis Doo-Doo Dip da Dip 19:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • -elete --Dexter111344 20:25, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • I was hoping to read a tale about a drifting tofu delivery boy. Instead I read this random whateveritis. Even Itsuki wouldn't think this was cool. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

M-men

Keep
Delete
  • Delete I would say something like "well-written satire on the plight of immigrants today." However, it is not that. It is not funny, nor well-written. It devolves into a rant halfway past the long list, and it is not a topic that I care to see here. Also, I feel like it was on here before, but that could just be the voices in my head.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Summaries of imaginary plotlines are not funny. 90% of this piece is simply summarized plot with no jokes, no scenes (therefore no situational humor), and little coherence. ----OEJ 19:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 21:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Fictitious subject, no humour, and the racist epithets don't help. Huff --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per everyone else. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:00, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Scottish sushi

Keep
  • Weak keep I'd say de-expand actually - get rid of the technical stuff and it might be better. I'm voting thusly mainly because I might have a look at it a bit later to see if something wonderful can be made of it. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete Pseudo-factual, unfunny, and a non-notable, not-worth-salvaging concept. Some may say {{expand}}, perhaps, but consider this: would we miss this article if it were gone?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:25, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I assume it's supposed to be some kind of comment on Japanese whisky. RabbiTechno 17:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • I may not be Japanese but this article still offends me for some reason. --Dexter111344 17:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Mail prostitute

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Might be best to move it to UnDictionary. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • Really quite funny, but terribly underdeveloped. I copied the text to my userspace, and will work on it at some future date if it gets deleted...I don't have the time right now, so I can't vote "Keep". ----OEJ 19:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

John Donne

Keep
  • Keep Seems quite unrandom and relevant to him, actually, and made me chuckle, at least when I worked out some of the jokes. You have to give points for using "piece of shit" in a vaguely intelligent joke. (/me now ducks in hope of not being Insinerated.) --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:47, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 16:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete RabbiTechno 17:14, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It uses all of my favorite huff reasons. It's textbook horrible: random numbers, random "humor" (in quotes because it's not funny), poor spelling and grammar, and short. There is no reason to let this "flea" live.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:47, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Dexter111344 20:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

The Fairly OddParents

Keep
Delete
Comments

Juan Valdez

Keep
Delete
Comments

Police dog

Keep
Delete
  • Delete From Lounge. It's a joke. No, literally, it's a joke. And either there's something I'm not getting, or it just isn't funny. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete A joke that made me laugh in the pub - after seven pints. Doesn't work when I'm sober. RabbiTechno 17:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Uncyc is no place for jokes. Well, you know what I mean. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • Delete Shaggy Dog Story except unfunny and ungood (kinda like Shaggy Dog Story, but at least that has a point).-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Not especially funny, long, or shaggy, and is all over the Internet[1]. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 20:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Shaggy Dog Stories suck. All of them. Even this one. --Dexter111344 20:12, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Horace Export

Keep
Delete
  • Delete From Lounge. Also from the Haskodrome series, which is strange enough that I haven't had the heart to nom it's few remaining pages. But this one doesn't stand alone, so here it is. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete My browser crashed while I read it - sure there's no connection, but I'm in a bad mood now. RabbiTechno 17:42, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Isn't this vanity? It looks like it, from the picture.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:38, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and the picture as well. --Dexter111344 19:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete article and picture too. ----OEJ 19:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Game Boy Microscopic

Keep
  • Keep I had a quick tidy to see what was under the layers of grimy English and it turned out okay. If it gets deleted I'll nick the good bits for the Yocto article. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep It definately has merit now, post clean up. Thanks Sbu!! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:47, 30 July 2007
  • Keep this. It isn't that bad. --Dexter111344 17:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • I've just put about 8 VFD tags on articles - please remember. Sir Roger 21:33, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Quantum Penis Physics

Keep
  • Keep Bad, but not VFD bad. Sir Roger 21:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Obelisk

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • I knew someone was going to vote keep because of the bubble joke! I'll admit I found that pretty funny. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Archived VFD Discussions

Template:VFDarchive

Personal tools
In other languages
projects