Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/old

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)
Line 224: Line 224:
 
|}
 
|}
   
  +
== [[Oprah winfry]] ==
  +
*'''Keep'''
   
  +
*'''Delete'''
   
  +
'''Delete''' It's pointness. We already have an Ophra article, and the article itself is just... dumb. Also, the same creator made another stupid page. [[User:Cheddar Cheesia|Cheddar Cheesia]] 17:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
   
  +
*'''Comments'''
   
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=

Revision as of 17:42, March 23, 2007

Don't use these sub pages:

Rules and procedures:

  1. Before doing anything else, make sure that you are well versed on Uncyclopedia's deletion policy.
    1. If you're too lazy to read the deletion policy, please, at least, carefully read this list of rules.
    2. But seriously, read the deletion policy.
    3. Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
    4. Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
  2. If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:

Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.

  1. If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
    1. Thank you.
    2. No, really, thank you very much.
    3. Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
    4. Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a *
      1. * - Creates a bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the *).
      2. Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
      3. --~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
  2. If you are not an administrator or the designated {{poopsmith}}, do not remove anything from VFD, doing so will get you banned for a very long time.

Pages for Deletion

Zombiebaronvs.Braydie

Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nailbat before we tear our hair out in frustration.
Don't flood this page - if there are more than 15 articles with active voting, wait until some of those get settled before adding more. Flooding discourages votes.

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.


New articles

Keep
Delete
  • Delete (Well, only 15 are "active".) And it really is awful. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 15:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete I don't see how this is funny; it's almost QVFD material... --Pentium5dot1 17:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Terrance and Phillip

Keep
Delete
Comments

Template:I'm Thirsty, Image:Milk Article.jpg, Template:Article Hungry, Image:Article Hungry.jpg

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • I say keep, FOR ME. If you want to get them off the other articles, fine. But, I want them all for at least MY USERPAGE. I created them. I deserve power over them. They can stay on my userpage. Cheddar Cheesia 17:27, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Cambodian banana University

Keep
  • Keep Not sure why. Maybe as much for the style as anything else. It's just good innocent fun. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. Not sure why either. That elephant "Professor Bob Trumpington naked" could become a fun sort-of-meme-thing if it isn't overused too much. Solar penguin 11:33, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Captain hate meatballs

Keep
Delete
Comments

Canso Causeway

Keep
Delete
Comments

Cave Bear

Keep
Delete
Comments

Cheese Weapon

Keep
Delete
Comments

Chicken and chips

Keep
Delete
Comments

Child Modelling

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • I love the opening line "Child Modelling is the process whereby artists form children in women's wombs, during the first trimester of pregnancy." There's a lot of potential to expand on this (satire on intelligent design, etc.) Shame the rest of the article doesn't follow on from it. Solar penguin 08:46, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Chocolate, Raspberry-Cream-filled, Jesus

Keep
Delete
  • Yet another one of the crappy pages I found while scrolling through Special:Lonelypages. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:39, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm afraid I must vote against this. I know this place makes fun of everything, but some things on here just make me angry. This article is just more making fun of Jesus. I think those jokes about Jesus need to stop. So, do not give me that "we make fun of everything" garbage. I am still voting against this. Cheddar Cheesia 17:32, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Great title, shame about the article! Solar penguin 08:49, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Cinderella interpretation

Keep
Delete
Comments

Classic 5

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • This lot don't seem to have been VFDed... Also Cs, I know you've found a great goldmine, but could we have it in slightly smaller nuggets? Leave some space for us Englanders to use VFD eh? --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

UnBooks:Linux For Noobs and Nooblets

Keep
Delete
Comments

Antonio Meucci

Keep
  • Keep. Undid dodgy formatting and slight deletion, now seems less bad. Funny in places. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:32, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep - Pretty crap, but not the sort of thing I think necessarily needs to be deleted. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:00, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete - pro-Italian claptrap, it's not even a real article. Besides, they should be proud of Marconi & leave it at that. --Smrt-guy 09:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Roman Dog Bird 20:54, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 23:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Oprah winfry

  • Keep
  • Delete

Delete It's pointness. We already have an Ophra article, and the article itself is just... dumb. Also, the same creator made another stupid page. Cheddar Cheesia 17:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Comments

Archived VFD Discussions

Template:VFDarchive

Personal tools
In other languages
projects