'''Removed from VFD, but deleted anyway'''. Admiral06, read the deletion policy. The proper course of action would have been to NRV it or list it on QVFD. VFD is not here for fast deletion; that's why it takes 6 net votes to delete and 24 hours before any action is taken. Do it again and I ban you for a day and block you from editing VFD for a week. {{User:Hinoa4/sig4}} 00:08, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
Abusers of the policy will be abused themselves. You have been warned.
If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
Place {{vfd}} at the top of the page you would like to add to VFD. Unmarked articles will be removed from VFD without prejudice.
Create a new section for your nominated article.
New entries on top.
Every article must be given a section of its own; if you are putting 10 related articles up, every single one should be given a section of its own.
Edit the Pages for Deletion section below and carefully follow the (currently hidden) instructions you see there. If you screw it up, you will probably get banned.
Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
Thank you.
No, really, thank you very much.
Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a *
* - Creates a bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the *).
Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
--~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
If you are not an administrator or the designated {{poopsmith}}, do not remove anything from VFD, doing so will get you banned for a very long time.
Delete. Pointless. --Admiral06 23:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Can you believe this took multiple edits to create? --!!!??? 23:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Launch all delete for great justice. I love the picture though. --Darkfred 23:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Removed from VFD, but deleted anyway. Admiral06, read the deletion policy. The proper course of action would have been to NRV it or list it on QVFD. VFD is not here for fast deletion; that's why it takes 6 net votes to delete and 24 hours before any action is taken. Do it again and I ban you for a day and block you from editing VFD for a week. —RT. HON.HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 00:08, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Keep This is funny, but since it is apparently a telephone number in colorado it should be moved immediately. --Darkfred 23:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Delete Not funny, serves no purpose. --Hhamdy283 20:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Some of it is pretty funny (in a geeky way)--but all of the jokes would work just as well in any other article. Plus, I suspect this is User:24.187.75.139's phone number or something, so (even though all of the original text is gone), if the article is kept, it should be moved to a different number (where, again, it would be exactly as funny). --!!!??? 23:17, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Pure crap. Makes me want a hamburger, though. --Hhamdy283 20:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Burn. A load of garbage.
Comments
Other than the first few words, how is this vanity? Mr. Briggs Inc. 11:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Huh? It doesn't look like vanity to me, nor does it look humorous, then again it is extremely poorly formatted... so I wasn't enticed to look for long... I have no feelings about this article whatsoever otherwise. --Mindsunwound: (NS) Crotch Drops There 18:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
REMOVED FROM VFD. NXWave, please do not VFD articles that WERE JUST FUCKING CREATED. That is what the maintanance tags are for. Next time you add such an article to VFD, you will be banned for a day and prohibited from editing VFD for a week. Capice? —RT. HON.HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 23:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete:The (adjective) War which started in (year) and ended in (year) was an (adjective) fight between the (people_name)s and the (nonsequitur)s, leading to casualties in the (stupidnum) range. All it's missing is an Oscar Wilde quote. --CaptainSpamMUNPUTPBAA 22:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Possibly hopes for a re-write, but until then: bye-bye Mr. Article. --The Rt. Hon.BarryCMUN(Symposium!)Sigh.Double Sigh. 23:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete, although it might be funny if translated into English. --!!!??? 01:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete. I wish this article would marry Courtney Love so she would have it killed. --Hhamdy283 03:51, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete, too many redlinks on there too. ~ QUILz( talk | contrib ) 17:29, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Reeks of Vanity. Plus, the pics suck. -- Hindleyite 18:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
This one sucks --Mindsunwound: (NS) Crotch Drops There 18:54, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Too many red links, the pics suck, and it reeks of vanity. --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Make it dead. Stinks of vanity, too many red links, and you can only have so many Darths before it's no longer funny. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]MUNCMNSF@H (drivel) 13:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Re-Write I think that this concept has much more potential than is currently exploited. The Darthii should be re-ordered similar to the Jesii Project... --Mindsunwound: (NS) Crotch Drops There 18:55, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
I second For reasons similar to Darth Hitler Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
I Third Serious potential for funny here, i was laughing before I began reading. And the article itself was actually more amusing then average from what I have read. Not hilarious, but infinitely funnier than Calcium or Donald Duck. This website is supposed to be funny right? at least amusing? Do you have a better article which just happens to need this name? If so then just post it. --Darkfred 22:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Keep for the reasons under Sidious below. (But Darkfred, just because we have no other use for the name doesn't mean we shouldn't kill it. After all, we do have a better use for the name Special:Random.) --!!!??? 03:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete
The time has come. Execute Order 66. Let the Great Darth Purge commence. - Sir Sikon[formerly known as Guest] 16:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Re-Write I think that this concept has much more potential than is currently exploited. The Darthii should be re-ordered similar to the Jesii Project... --Mindsunwound: (NS) Crotch Drops There 18:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Re-Write I think that this concept has much more potential than is currently exploited. The Darthii should be re-ordered similar to the Jesii Project... --Mindsunwound: (NS) Crotch Drops There 18:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
I second besides, this is practically an uncyclopedia In-Joke, Darth AND Hitler! Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Keep - rewrite Like Hitler, only Evil I love it! --Darkfred 22:29, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Keep for the reasons under Sidious below. --!!!??? 03:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Keep. It's actually pretty decent. I'm sticking an expansion tag on this mothah if it's ok with all yous. --Hhamdy283 03:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Re-Write I think that this concept has much more potential than is currently exploited. The Darthii should be re-ordered similar to the Jesii Project... --Mindsunwound: (NS) Crotch Drops There 19:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Re-Write I think that this concept has much more potential than is currently exploited. The Darthii should be re-ordered similar to the Jesii Project... --Mindsunwound: (NS) Crotch Drops There 19:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Keep. After the current rewriting fervor ends, someone can go over all the Darths and re-VFD any still-crappy ones, and then if there are few or no survivors VFD Template:Darth separately. (But I'm pretty sure rewriters shouldn't go removing the VFD template before the vote here is finished.) --!!!??? 03:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
The time has come. Execute Order 66. Let the Great Darth Purge commence. - Sir Sikon[formerly known as Guest] 16:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
oh, heck yeah, this thing is too far off kilter to be funny, it should at least have a remote twinge of truth hidden in a pack of lies, but this is just too silly. start the next sketch! --Sharkbait1986 16:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Redirect to Emperor Palpatine. >Major Sir Hinoa|Talk|KUN▋ 22:27, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Eliminate. --Hhamdy283 03:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Make them suffer. This would serve the Cabalthe Empire Uncyclopedia much better as a simple redirect to Emperor Palpatine. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]MUNCMNSF@H (drivel) 13:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Mindsunwound, are you volunteering to rewrite all these pages, like soon? If not, given that most of these went weeks or months with expand, fix, or similar tags with nothing being done but vandalism, I don't think it's going to happen. --!!!??? 20:18, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Falcotron, no, I'm not volunteering to rewrite them all, if they get huffed so be it, I was just sharing my opinion on them, and yes, I did look at each and every one... okay... so maybe I got bored after the cow one... which is really funny by the by. --Mindsunwound: (NS) Crotch Drops There 00:05, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
no, I read the hitler one too... also funnyish --Mindsunwound: (NS) Crotch Drops There 00:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
As far as I can tell from the rules voting keep does not create a requirement that you then rewrite the article. In fact suggesting that it does, to discourage further voting, is downright evil. When this sort of thing happens in real elections people end up in jail. --Darkfred 01:03, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
