Uncyclopedia:VFS

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Op Mr-ex777)
(Do we want to vote for new admins? February edition)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Do we want to vote for new admins? February edition==
 
==Do we want to vote for new admins? February edition==
{{s|-8}}
+
{{s|-9}}
 
*'''Against''' -- {{User:Zombiebaron/sig}} 22:59, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
 
*'''Against''' -- {{User:Zombiebaron/sig}} 22:59, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
 
*{{Against}} We just got one who has been doing a fine job for the last like, fifteen minutes. --{{User:Magic man/sig}} 23:13, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
 
*{{Against}} We just got one who has been doing a fine job for the last like, fifteen minutes. --{{User:Magic man/sig}} 23:13, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
*'''For''' Because you can never have too many admins. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig2|1328274293}}
 
*'''For''' Because you can never have too many admins. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig2|1328274293}}
 
*{{Against}} - I don't think it's really necessary for the time being. Maybe when we're out of food and eating [[user:PIGGY|other sysops]]. {{user:GEORGIEGIBBONS/sig}} 20:42, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
 
*{{Against}} - I don't think it's really necessary for the time being. Maybe when we're out of food and eating [[user:PIGGY|other sysops]]. {{user:GEORGIEGIBBONS/sig}} 20:42, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
  +
*'''Against.''' The last two haven't had their spirits broken yet. -{{User:RAHB/sig}} 05:03, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
   
 
==Do we want to op: Zombiebaron==
 
==Do we want to op: Zombiebaron==

Revision as of 05:03, February 7, 2012

Do we want to vote for new admins? February edition

Score: -9
  • Against -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:59, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol against vote Against. We just got one who has been doing a fine job for the last like, fifteen minutes. -- Tophat headless 23:13, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • SHUT UP --Roman Dog Bird 23:40, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • YES! (users votes count as five) --ShabiDOO 23:45, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • No thanks, but thanks for asking. --Black Flamingo 00:43, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • I think we should wait until at least April before we even begin to consider the idea. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 05:39, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • Against Enough now. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:52, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • For Because you can never have too many admins. Pup 01:04 03 Feb '12
  • Symbol against vote Against. - I don't think it's really necessary for the time being. Maybe when we're out of food and eating other sysops. Sir Georgie Harangue Mediocracy 20:42, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • Against. The last two haven't had their spirits broken yet. -RAHB 05:03, February 7, 2012 (UTC)

Do we want to op: Zombiebaron

Score: 1
  • Strong For <Zombiebaron> You should take over VFS to op Zombiebaron ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 20:35, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Op my piggy

  • Again. 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 21:23, 3 February 2012
  • Again! Again! -RAHB 22:14, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • Again? Again? Again? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 22:15, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • I think you misspelled against. Pup 10:37 03 Feb '12

Op Mr-ex777

Score: 3
  • Strong for ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 10:29, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For.--fcukmanLOOS3R! Desu desu 10:32, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • For! I can't wait till he replaces the front page with a charcoal drawing of Richard Nixon putting his balls in a Diglett's mouth while being fucked from behind by Calcifer from Howl's Moving Castle! -RAHB 23:51, February 6, 2012 (UTC)

Less Users

Score: 2
  • For An abundance of new users. All editing things, changing stuff and generally making articles different to how they were previously. We have had enough of it I tell you. MrN  Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 20:49, Feb 6
Personal tools
projects