# Uncyclopedia:VFP

(Difference between revisions)

Sign below a picture you find excellent - new nominations go on top. Unsigned votes will be thrown out, and IP votes carry less weight than votes cast by a registered user, because anonymous IPs are pathetic peons in our eyes. Feel free to add an thumb + description + article. You may nominate and vote for your own images: such is the freedom of Uncyclopedia. Make sure your vote is clear, by using 'For' and 'Against' in bold type. Neutral votes are absolutely unnecessary. If you're only making a comment and not voting, be sure to note that.

Please submit only original pictures to VFP! Images cribbed from elsewhere on the internet will not be featured on the front page, though you are welcome to use them in articles.

For discussion about VFP see Uncyclopedia:Community_Portal/archive2#Here_we_go_again_with_Rainbow_Brite.

When nominating an image, the template Template:VFP should be added to the end of the entry using {{VFP}}. A featured article should have the template Template:ImageFP, using {{ImageFP}}.

DO NOT place multiple versions of an image in a single entry. Should the original nomination fail, nominate the revised version after it has been deleted.

Removal/archival of failed/expired candidates, as well as the decision on which have reached failure, must only be performed by the sysops who have nothing better to do than look at pictures all day, so leave it to them.

You can see all the featured images listed here, or on the archived voting pages: 1, 2

To vote on previously featured images, use Uncyclopedia:PFP.

THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE.
Please limit discussion to the VFP discussion page, or the appropriate image talk.

# Current nominations

## Al C'pwnd

Featured picture candidate

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image

For. It's the only one with a chance. 01:23, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

I do quite like this one, if I do say so myself. --KATIE!! 02:03, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Weak For and Comment: I can't tell what's going on... --— 02:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against Though I like the punnery (Al Cap-pwned), it just doesn't inspire chuckles. Strong Rad 02:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against - Sorry, but this is a clear violation of the "No Use of the word 'Pwned' rule. --Some user 02:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

## O_0

Featured picture candidate

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image

FOR! Might need a new caption though... because i suck. 01:19, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Uh... No. --Spin 02:05, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Image sucks, and so do you, Tomp. ;-) Against. --— 02:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against There's just nothing to laugh at here....Strong Rad 02:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against. O_0, I think I'm just going to automatically vote against any image Keitei uploads from now on. That's not meant to suggest she's a bad person, though. --Some user 02:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

## PENISPENISPENIS!!!

Featured picture candidate

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image

• For. Because it's awesome and you know it. 01:19, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• As much as my screencap skills totally pwn, it's too small. --KATIE!! 01:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against it's to small, not mine, yours. -- 01:23, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• No. Just no. --— 02:07, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Come on. I know it's hard, but we should be able to whip out a better penis joke. This is just limp. Strong Rad 02:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Auto-Against. --Some user 02:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

## Fedora Core

Featured picture candidate

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image

• Shameless Self Promotion Not like I haven't done it before...=P Strong Rad 04:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• For, homey G. — 04:26, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• For, naturally.  :) ~ T. (talk) 05:37, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN3 NotM ::: 07:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Yo! --OsirisX 06:53, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• For I can hear the bullits whizzing from the Bronx as we speek...--Nappy The Quarryman 07:28, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• For An heir to Microsoft Word --Mulehunter 21:49, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• For No Security Ho's to dawg ya, either. Dame  22:36, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• For, if only because it's RadX ;) Anon32 00:24, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Fo! You no mess around in da 'hood, man... --Carlb 05:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. Um, I guess I just don't get it.-- 14:58, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

## Bunch of Windows errors

Featured picture candidate

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image

• Self-promotion. - User:Guest/sig 19:35, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Error 4-0-for. But really against since it's unreadable. I had to use the stupid pun. - Nonymous 19:44, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. "An error has occured whilst trying to display an error message". Genius. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 19:53, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Look at it carefully. :D --— 20:21, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. This is HIILARIOUS when viewed much bigger than it will appear on the main page.-- 20:33, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Cancel. Maybe back in 1995, where "lol microsoft errors" jokes were still occasionally funny... --Andrusi 22:25, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: one of the error boxes says, "Our of screen space..." instead of OUT of screen space... otherwise pretty good job. I think it's too big to be front page material though. But then again it's obvious what is going on. -- – Mahroww a.k.a.  22:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Fixored the "our of screen space". - User:Guest/sig 01:40, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Cool...but I just noticed that on teh ult. spam exp. "make money fase" is speld wrahng two. Anyway, you should leave it because spam is notorious for misspellingggss. -- – Mahroww a.k.a.  06:23, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against It's a bit funny, but only at a large and legible size. --Spin 00:42, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against Valiant try, but I know people (my mother, my aunt, my other aunt) with desktops like this all the time. Dame  01:10, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• For - I actually like this one, though you do have to see it full-size to appreciate all the effort put into it. Nice work, Sikon/Guest!  c • > •  02:00, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• foroooohhh yeaaa--Nappy The Quarryman 05:01, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• for I think it'll work... It's cliche but it does have quite a bit of original work too.. id est all the Unclylopedia jokes. -- – Mahroww a.k.a.  06:23, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• $\sum_{i=0}^{1} 2i+1$ --
• for - even if you can't read everything, the image is a fun one. May I suggest changing the caption to something like "Windows XP is world-renowned for its stability and reliability."?--Wyattj 13:21, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Great idea. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:43, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I like the image, it just isn't good shrunk down to featured size. Swordmaster 17:34, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against I've seen a lot of windows humor and this is merely mediocre--Count of Monkey Crisco 17:50, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong F-AN ERROR HAS OCCURED A FF0000 PRESS ANY KEY TO CONTINUE --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:43, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Haha, one of them's an AAAAAAAAA! PURE GOLD! Also, I'm making this my new desktop background, to replace that flash-based cursor-following matrix. And, this reminds me of that time when my browser would crash every time I visited VFP. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• STRONG FOR. :) ~ T. (talk) 20:22, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• +12 There... that should be enough votes to get featured. 20:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• I'm gonna go ahead and vote for this one... --⇔ 22:01, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Abort. Retry. For. --Skyscraper 22:53, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• For Hahh! So true.. this truly deserves the votes
• For. It may be small, but you get the idea. --OsirisX 07:00, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Size.--Rataube 14:40, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• For(24.207.91.40 15:38, 17 February 2006 (UTC))
• For. Although it may be a bit dated, there's at least two references to Uncyclopedia that are NOT blatantly obvious, and that had me laughing out loud. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• For! This is fantastic! AAAAAAAAAA! 21:37, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Mulehunter
• For. Funny stuff. --Ladypolitik 02:55, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

## Lost

Featured picture candidate

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image

Nominated. --officer designate Lugiatm 19:11, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

• Against. I don't get it. I got a C- in Humour 100. --— 23:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For Didn't make me laugh out loud, but I can see the humor in this, having been to Europe where the signs confused the heck out of me.-- 03:57, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For--Rataube 13:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• very week forIt's funnie, just not very funnie----Nappy The Quarryman 23:04, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• This is ok eh.. weak for User:Anidnmeno/sig 20:00, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• I love it - If you've ever lived in England, you know this is true. --PiOfFive 20:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against - Nothing really wrong with it, it just lacks topicality. And it's too dark. --Some user 00:34, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• For - Lots of Stateside signs are worse though. FireballX301 00:41, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for Canadian route markers are even worse than British ones. Not surprising, since they're still almost a colony, that they perfect the art of their mother country... » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c »
• Against. Fine and true, but hardly an exceptional work of art.--Winston 07:40, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against -- 14:44, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I find it funny, but I don't think it has pontential for the front page. --Boy Toy bitch at me 15:15, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. I say good enough for front page material, its not like worse thing have gotten on there...--Jocke Pirat 15:18, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• For So totally English...it's funny --
18:40, 14 February 2006 (EST)
• For. Made me laugh out loud. Aaarrrggh 10:42, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• For I only just found out that this was nominated -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 19:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• MEOW! and just too true. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 20:46, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against Arg... 21:40, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Mulehunter
• For. Funny. Necessary Evil 22:52, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For. I don't live in England, but this is quite funny. Unsigned --Boy Toy bitch at me 14:50, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For. I don't live in England, but this is quite funny. --Ladypolitik 21:33, 19 February 2006 (UTC) (oops! sorry about forgetting to sign :P)

## Joy of Killing

Featured picture candidate

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image

...happy little corpses... --KATIE!! 09:47, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

• For.-- 09:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against(Uncyclopedian 15:49, 7 February 2006 (UTC))
• For. Uncyclopedian, senses of humor can be rented at the front desk. :D --— 16:35, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for I only got this joke because someone explained it to me. It IS hilarious, but I didn't get it at first.17:30, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• For 'I'm gonna bust a happy little cap in your pretty little head' User:Anidnmeno/sig 19:34, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. HAHAHAHAHA! 21:44, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Abstain, until KILLING is written in happy little trees. -- – Mahroww a.k.a.  22:44, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against - tough to see the word "killing", could be better --Jester 06:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against or Abstain I have no idea who that guy is... 16:22, 8 February 2006

(UTC)Mulehunter

• After a short research I find it quite funny! but I keep my first impression
• For those of us old (read: 20-something) people who grew up with Bob Ross will appreciate this.Tom Veil 20:09, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• For I fixed the lettering a bit so that it shows up better. Not sure why it showed up so dark before. Strong Rad 16:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Ya know, ol' Happy Trees was a 'Nam vet... I think that should be incorporated into the caption. (I always wanted to see him crack on the show and start mixing some Asian Yellow with Agent Orange) Conditional For. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against: The Joy of Killing ought to relate to The Joy of Cooking somehow. Also, the image isn't very funny. --Sir gwax (talk) 21:32, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Having been reminded that in fact, the Joy of Painting is the reference, I retract my objections. I do think it could be made a slightly more obvious reference though (caption perhaps). --Sir gwax (talk) 20:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
??? Why? It relates to the Joy of Painting....Strong Rad 01:13, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• I reject your reality and substitute my own! Actually, I think you either get this one or you don't, and no amount of prompting for laughter will help. Strong Rad 12:50, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Mix some Pink-o Commie with Olive drab and you get a happy little For that's right, RadicalX is back bitches!--Sir Slackerboya CUN VFH (talk) 15:27, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• For What the hell? You kids are clearly too young or foreign to understand this joke. It's extremely funny, and the article is even funnier than the image. The Joy of Cooking was a direct name rip off from The Joy of Painting, along with others. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 07:06, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• For Awesome. --Teapot 18:59, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• I'm against its featuring. I do know the show, and I do think it's funny, but I don't think it's front page material. --Boy Toy bitch at me 22:00, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• For --Jocke Pirat 02:58, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Made me laugh out loud. Must be good. :D. Sir Carlos the Mean CUN VFP CS CM CUNT (talk) 01:55, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• For I can hear Bob Ross from the great beyond "Its your world, your massacre, and you can kill as many people as you want." Dame  01:20, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
That's Beautiful, Prettiest...I just added that quote to the Joy of Killing page...Strong Rad 01:59, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• '"For'" This is absolutely hilarious Unsigned Strong Rad 12:49, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Mr. Ross may only be recognisable to a certain demographic, but I am a member, and I do like this.--Winston 14:39, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• For, and I shall derive joy from killing all who vote otherwise. --Andrusi 22:18, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

## Wiki DeathStar 5

Featured picture candidate

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image

Wiki DeathStars moved to WikiWars, on the discussion page. Please, anyone who cares, make an article about them.

Sorry guys. It's neither the time nor the place, but I couldn't resist --S P I N N I E 22:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

• For! This is actually the best of the bunch.--Bradaphraser 22:49, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- 23:06, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very original idea,actually. 23:13, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• I agree, Four was not enough. Nonymous 00:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• For, eh? -- 00:29, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• We need 'for more version--Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN3 NotM ::: 00:39, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Against As an in-joke, it's really funny (and well made), but I can't imagine people that haven't seen the others will understand it. In any case, there should probably be an article for these pictures (something about a brave group of uncyclopedian rebels fighting a war against the evil foundation, aided by teddybears). Doug 03:25, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: I like this one, it's funny. However, without a wikideathstar, it is a slightly confusing in-joke, as Doug mentions above. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 03:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Comment: I'll vote for it if someone gives it a suitable description. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 22:10, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Comment I just changed the caption...you like it Dawg? -- 01:15, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Comment I changed it again, but it's still not funny. --S P I N N I E 03:08, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Comment: I changed it. :-) --Boy Toy bitch at me 03:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. But how many Wiki Deathstars does one need to make? --— 03:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Too blurry and hard to get. - User:Guest/sig 06:23, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional for - add more symbols to the walls to make it look more like a Wiki. --80.195.22.150 09:58, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• For. In-jokes are the best jokes. --KATIE!! 20:45, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• For see, THIS is new, all the other ones, just no. new jokes,or at least variations like this one, PLEASE!!!--Nappy The Quarryman 07:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against. --Rataube 13:27, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against: in the context of the other ones, this is good but it doesn't have enough funny as a standalone image to warrant featuring. --Sir gwax (talk) 17:13, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against, until. Improve this picture, make the puzzle pieces smaller, and then I'll vote for it. --Boy Toy bitch at me 23:04, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• For: This rules! (24.207.91.40 04:59, 2 February 2006 (UTC))
• Against. The joke has got so out of hand, it's lost the original "funny". --⇔ 22:49, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Comment If by "out of hand" you mean "funny", and by "it's lost the original "'funny'", you mean "It should be continued," I concur.--S P I N N I E 06:37, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Great, this shit is headed for the number one spot! User:Anidnmeno/sig 19:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against. The others were better. --OsirisX 01:18, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• For: This is head ans shoulders above the rest, the best one.
• For. --Gamiac 18:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. This is just cool!(Uncyclopedian 00:51, 6 February 2006 (UTC))
• Against there's obviously some in-joke here that I'm missing because I've not be on here for a while, and if I don't get it, I think a lot of other people won't either. Sir Carlos the Mean CUN VFP CS CM CUNT (talk) 01:58, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against Sorry, but A for effort. Dame  01:11, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against Doesn't look much like the Wikipedia logo. The Third one is best, I accidently clicked the edit on the picture when trying to vote! Then my browser crashed --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:51, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

## Polar Bear

Featured picture candidate

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image

• For. I saw it in new images a while back. I thought it was funny. -- 11:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I like the pic but I don't think it's funny. --Boy Toy bitch at me 16:16, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for This one also caught my eye. It's well done, and it's funny if you're not paying attention for a moment, then figure out he's not actually eating raspberries. -- Bradaphraser 18:17, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• For--Rataube 22:46, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• For Pretty funny. --—rc (t) 03:04, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
• For I got a good laugh out of that one after I realized what was going on. --Mosquitopsu 15:19, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. I'm stupid. What's he really eating? It just looks like a bunch of red balls, with blood around them. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 00:24, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Againstits just a polar bear eating something dead and bloody with raspberries photoshopped on top, is this some joke for people who live in countrys with normal bears? --Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN3 NotM ::: 00:37, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. The "censoring" effect is worth a smirk, but not much else. Plus, the blood's just too obvious to make the raspberries work -- my initial thought was "bloody snowballs?" when I saw it. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:19, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• For--S P I N N I E 22:58, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• FOREEEEE!!!!!--User:Golfer 1:58, 01 February 2006 (UTC)
• ACK!!! You really have to read the article to have an appreciation for the pic. It's supposed to be a crappy, obvious photoshop job, that's what makes it funny. Based on that criteria (or maybe the fact that I did it???) I say FOR. -- – Mahroww a.k.a.  08:18, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Abstain until a far better comment is added.... --⇔ 22:50, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against WTF?? User:Anidnmeno/sig 19:39, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• For - I just changed the caption... Better? -- c • > •  17:21, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Comment Hey! You changed the caption...it draws attention ^^^away^^^ from the pic, not to it. HOW DARE YOU!
Further discussion moved to Image_talk:Polarbear.jpg
• Weak for Good, but why did you keep a piece of the kill under the bear?(24.207.91.40 04:59, 5 February 2006 (UTC))
• For --eander315 17:21, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Rei 19:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against, until Change the caption to something funny, please.(Uncyclopedian 02:58, 6 February 2006 (UTC))
• For --Lurgy 06:16, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• FOR the best part of it is the fact that there is a piece of seal left!!!! 16:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)Mulehunter
• Okie dokie. ~ T. (talk) 04:45, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

## Amnesia Islands

Featured picture candidate

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image

Since you guys seem to be looking for the next big RadX image (two shot down this week), try this one. I'm for it. Strong RadX 21:52, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• For ~ Kakun 22:28, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Forward - Nonymous 23:35, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against - the question mark means alot more then forgetfulness --Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN3 NotM ::: 05:41, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• But in the contest of a desereted island, it means only that. Kakun 15:25, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It's a nice image and all, but it doesn't hold much comedy value. --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 07:17, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Does the new caption help the comedic value any? Strong RadX 20:11, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. I... kinda like it. Acid Ammo 15:47, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Rataube 18:47, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. --PiOfFive Brilliant!
• Against -- 16:19, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Four. Four-thirty in Newfoundland. --Carlb 16:59, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against Good art. Not a bad concept. ...it just doesn't make me chuckle.--Bradaphraser 21:55, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Ok, the new blurb won this one for me.--Bradaphraser 23:15, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For - Reminds me of my mental state most of the time. Why am I here again??? User:Anidnmeno/sig
• FOR - I must see this image in the portal NOW!! Unsigned
• weak for, it's not really up to par with the rest (e.g. Mr. T in stained glass) Anon32 21:18, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against Amnesia Island, but for Questionable Atoll. Prettiestpretty 16:55, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Changed vote FOR! Prettiestpretty 15:19, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
What if we called it the Island from the TV show "Lost"? Strong Rad 20:23, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For: it's got a quaint charm to it. --Sir gwax (talk) 05:29, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against --Leo 06:27, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against due to the new caption. Honestly, I like the caption given on its source page better than the suggested alternatives. --Algorithm (talk) 08:53, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For this image with this caption. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 10:14, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against --S P I N N I E 15:34, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against - a bit weak IMO - David Gerard 12:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Strong for. --Joe857 16:19, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I don't get it.(24.207.91.40 03:04, 5 February 2006 (UTC))
• For I like this a lot.(Uncyclopedian 01:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC))
• For Because... er... I've forgotten why... - Ghelae 18:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

# Previously Featured Pictures

## Hunting with Dick

Featured picture candidate

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image

Featured With Raddy's blessing, so don't go whining about Mr. Ross not being featured yet. --—rc (t) 06:01, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

• Self-Nominate What the hell... Dame  15:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• FOR!! He shot a 78-year-old man in the face!! User:Anidnmeno/sig 15:31, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• This is the sort of event that needs to be comemorated. An enthusiastic FOR, and let's hope he doesn't have the sense to retract any support he gives to the NRA. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:42, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Oooh.. topical! Aaarrrggh 15:45, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• Ah... the politics of shooting lawyers in the face. For.-- 17:15, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• Gotta love current event-related pics. Strong For. --— 18:37, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• Totally inaccurate, insulting to vice-presidents and the NRA - for. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp 18:54, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• For! What the heck, I'm pretty sure the FBI is already watching me anyway.  c • > •  00:09, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Let's get this featured while its still topical. -- 01:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• FOR!! if its featured while topical--Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN3 NotM ::: 07:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Topical perhaps, but Dick's head looks as it is about to roll off.--Winston 14:33, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• For I like it. Especially in the selection of the source image. Classic. Strong Rad 16:46, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Purrrr I like it too. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 20:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• for but you might resize and reshade a few things--Nappy The Quarryman 04:58, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• weak for Sloppy, stupid, topical but I still laughed my ass off--Count of Monkey Crisco 17:52, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Image could be better, but the caption's great. Though "Gun, Dick, gun!" ought to be "Shoot, Dick, shoot!" I'm not even a hunter, but I know better than to lower the gun to horizon level when hunting quail.--[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:45, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Against: Sure, the VP shot someone, sure that's funny but this image is too poorly done to deserve featuring. Also, a month from now it won't be funny anymore. --Sir gwax (talk) 20:11, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It doesn't please me. --Boy Toy bitch at me 21:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

## Rms

Featured picture candidate

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image

Featured --—rc (t) 06:05, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

• Nominate and For. --Rataube 14:08, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. By the way, you don't need the br tags. - User:Guest/sig 14:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. This joke will never get old. --officer designate Lugiatm 16:19, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• This was made FOR his article, but is great as a stand-alone pic. ~ T. (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• For We must mock those who respond to humor with violence, until they get the idea and mock us back.-- 18:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Wrath has the idea. --— 18:24, 9 February 2006 (UTC*
• For Very, very funny.User:ArcherMan15:24 9 FEB 2006
• Conditional for: I like the image a lot but I dislike the caption equally much. Change the caption and it'll be golden. --Sir gwax (talk) 21:36, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Suggestions welcomed!--Rataube 00:53, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• For "The tragedy of open-source suicide bombings"? --Some user 01:03, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• For - even better than the Lego Mohammed. --OsirisX 07:00, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• BLASPHEMY wtf... is that supposed to be a piccy of Mohammed?? This brings Uncyclopedia to a new low... how about this FUCK SOPH.... This entry was finished by the guy sitting next to him... he sits in a pile of ashes on the floor as he got struck by lightening User:Anidnmeno/sig 19:54, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• For, caption could still use improvement, but no ideas here... Anon32 14:38, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• For "This blatant desecration of Mohammed's gay twin, Faggotmed, enraged gay Muslims worldwide" --Jester 03:21, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
If not yoet done, correct spelling error of "direspect" on main page.--81.228.207.191 13:21, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

## Cabinet

Featured picture candidate

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image

Featured --—rc (t) 04:51, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

• Nominate and Vote. Funnier than any of the other current nominations.--Rataube 13:53, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's funny because it's true - Lunar_Yeti
• For. I believe this is an actual picture. User:Anidnmeno/sig 15:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For Some of the heads don't look correct, but other then that yes it's sorta funny -- 15:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• For - but the article it's on needs expanding, and it might be funnier if at least one person (not necessarily Bush himself; maybe the guy in back?) was not wearing a furry mask. --Some user 16:13, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against, until. What's with the wave of poorly done pictures? Make it look like the heads are actually attached to the bodies, then we'll see. --Boy Toy bitch at me 16:32, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. What the heck. If no-one else cares, why should I? --Boy Toy bitch at me 16:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• For!!!!! Hilarious!(24.207.91.40 16:49, 5 February 2006 (UTC))
Likely sock. --—rc (t) 06:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• For Needs a link in the blurb, but otherwise pretty good stuff.17:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. I just saw this, and I was thinking about nominating it, but now i can't remember where it's from. 17:24, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Whee, fun. --— 18:39, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Thanks for the nomination.  :) -- Rei 19:44, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Extreme For! This is perfect!(Uncyclopedian 00:54, 6 February 2006 (UTC))
• FOR! What an accurate depiction. --OsirisX 02:58, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• For --Xiao Li 09:39, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. I like it, but WHAT THE HELL IS THAT GRAY THING AAAAAAAHHH GET IT OFF ME AAAAAAHHHH!!! (BTW, anyone else getting a strong Avengers: The Movie vibe from this?) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:46, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• For Very clever --Jester 18:42, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• For Nominate this already!!!!(142.22.16.57 18:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC))
Comment: I think you meant "Feature this already." And I agree, but please don't use sockpuppets to vote. 20:01, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Likely sock. The IP, not Tompkins. --—rc (t) 06:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against The quality is pretty bad, sorry. Some conservative freak 01:02, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against I dislike ballot stuffing too --Splaka 06:29, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against It's pretty good, but some of the heads don't match. The hands look great through. --—rc (t) 06:37, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• For Although I agree with Some User in that one guy shouldnt have a mask 16:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC)Mulehunter