*'''Weak For''' and '''Comment:''' I can't tell what's going on... --{{User:Hinoa4/sig}} 02:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Weak For''' and '''Comment:''' I can't tell what's going on... --{{User:Hinoa4/sig}} 02:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Against''' Though I like the punnery (Al Cap-pwned), it just doesn't inspire chuckles. [[User:RadicalX|Strong Rad]] 02:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Against''' Though I like the punnery (Al Cap-pwned), it just doesn't inspire chuckles. [[User:RadicalX|Strong Rad]] 02:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
+
*'''Against''' - Sorry, but this is a clear violation of the "No Use of the word 'Pwned' rule. --[[User:Some user|Some user]] 02:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
== O_0 ==
== O_0 ==
Line 43:
Line 44:
*Image sucks, and so do you, Tomp. ;-) '''Against.''' --{{User:Hinoa4/sig}} 02:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
*Image sucks, and so do you, Tomp. ;-) '''Against.''' --{{User:Hinoa4/sig}} 02:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Against''' There's just nothing to laugh at here....[[User:RadicalX|Strong Rad]] 02:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Against''' There's just nothing to laugh at here....[[User:RadicalX|Strong Rad]] 02:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
+
*'''Against.''' O_0, I think I'm just going to automatically vote against any image [[User:Keitei|Keitei]] uploads from now on. That's not meant to suggest she's a bad person, though. --[[User:Some user|Some user]] 02:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
== PENISPENISPENIS!!! ==
== PENISPENISPENIS!!! ==
Line 52:
Line 54:
*'''No. Just no.''' --{{User:Hinoa4/sig}} 02:07, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''No. Just no.''' --{{User:Hinoa4/sig}} 02:07, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Against.''' Come on. I know it's hard, but we should be able to whip out a better penis joke. This is just limp. [[User:RadicalX|Strong Rad]] 02:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Against.''' Come on. I know it's hard, but we should be able to whip out a better penis joke. This is just limp. [[User:RadicalX|Strong Rad]] 02:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
+
*'''Auto-Against.''' --[[User:Some user|Some user]] 02:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Sign below a picture you find excellent - new nominations go on top. Unsigned votes will be thrown out, and IP votes carry less weight than votes cast by a registered user, because anonymous IPs are pathetic peons in our eyes. Feel free to add an thumb + description + article. You may nominate and vote for your own images: such is the freedom of Uncyclopedia. Make sure your vote is clear, by using 'For' and 'Against' in bold type. Neutral votes are absolutely unnecessary. If you're only making a comment and not voting, be sure to note that.
Please submit only original pictures to VFP! Images cribbed from elsewhere on the internet will not be featured on the front page, though you are welcome to use them in articles.
When nominating an image, the template Template:VFP should be added to the end of the entry using {{VFP}}. A featured article should have the template Template:ImageFP, using {{ImageFP}}.
DO NOT place multiple versions of an image in a single entry. Should the original nomination fail, nominate the revised version after it has been deleted.
Removal/archival of failed/expired candidates, as well as the decision on which have reached failure, must only be performed by the sysops who have nothing better to do than look at pictures all day, so leave it to them.
You can see all the featured images listed here, or on the archived voting pages: 1, 2
Image sucks, and so do you, Tomp. ;-) Against. --—HinoaKUN(talk) 02:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Against There's just nothing to laugh at here....Strong Rad 02:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Against. O_0, I think I'm just going to automatically vote against any image Keitei uploads from now on. That's not meant to suggest she's a bad person, though. --Some user 02:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Error 4-0-for. But really against since it's unreadable. I had to use the stupid pun. - Nonymous 19:44, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
For. "An error has occured whilst trying to display an error message". Genius. -- Sir CodeineK·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 19:53, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
For. Look at it carefully. :D --—HinoaKUN(talk) 20:21, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Weak against. This is HIILARIOUS when viewed much bigger than it will appear on the main page.--<<>> 20:33, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Cancel. Maybe back in 1995, where "lol microsoft errors" jokes were still occasionally funny... --Andrusi 22:25, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Comment: one of the error boxes says, "Our of screen space..." instead of OUT of screen space... otherwise pretty good job. I think it's too big to be front page material though. But then again it's obvious what is going on. -- – Mahroww a.k.a. Ernie “Aero-Toy” Smith 22:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Cool...but I just noticed that on teh ult. spam exp. "make money fase" is speld wrahng two. Anyway, you should leave it because spam is notorious for misspellingggss. -- – Mahroww a.k.a. Ernie “Aero-Toy” Smith 06:23, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Against It's a bit funny, but only at a large and legible size. --Spin 00:42, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Against Valiant try, but I know people (my mother, my aunt, my other aunt) with desktops like this all the time. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 01:10, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
For - I actually like this one, though you do have to see it full-size to appreciate all the effort put into it. Nice work, Sikon/Guest! c • > •cunwapquc? 02:00, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
for I think it'll work... It's cliche but it does have quite a bit of original work too.. id est all the Unclylopedia jokes. -- – Mahroww a.k.a. Ernie “Aero-Toy” Smith 06:23, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
for - even if you can't read everything, the image is a fun one. May I suggest changing the caption to something like "Windows XP is world-renowned for its stability and reliability."?--Wyattj 13:21, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Great idea. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:43, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Against. I like the image, it just isn't good shrunk down to featured size. Swordmaster 17:34, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Weak against I've seen a lot of windows humor and this is merely mediocre--Count of Monkey Crisco 17:50, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Strong F-AN ERROR HAS OCCURED A FF0000 PRESS ANY KEY TO CONTINUE --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:43, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Haha, one of them's an AAAAAAAAA! PURE GOLD! Also, I'm making this my new desktop background, to replace that flash-based cursor-following matrix. And, this reminds me of that time when my browser would crash every time I visited VFP. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
STRONG FOR. :) ~ T. (talk) 20:22, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
For. Although it may be a bit dated, there's at least two references to Uncyclopedia that are NOT blatantly obvious, and that had me laughing out loud. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
For! This is fantastic! AAAAAAAAAA! 21:37, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Mulehunter
For. Funny stuff. --Ladypolitik 02:55, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Against. I don't get it. I got a C- in Humour 100. --—HinoaKUN(talk) 23:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Weak For Didn't make me laugh out loud, but I can see the humor in this, having been to Europe where the signs confused the heck out of me.--<<>> 03:57, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
very week forIt's funnie, just not very funnie----Nappy The Quarryman 23:04, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
This is ok eh.. weak forANIDNMENOSCWICZ 20:00, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
I love it - If you've ever lived in England, you know this is true. --PiOfFive 20:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Against - Nothing really wrong with it, it just lacks topicality. And it's too dark. --Some user 00:34, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
For - Lots of Stateside signs are worse though. FireballX301 00:41, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Weak for Canadian route markers are even worse than British ones. Not surprising, since they're still almost a colony, that they perfect the art of their mother country... »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c»
Against. Fine and true, but hardly an exceptional work of art.--Winston 07:40, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
After a short research I find it quite funny! but I keep my first impression
For those of us old (read: 20-something) people who grew up with Bob Ross will appreciate this.Tom Veil 20:09, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
For I fixed the lettering a bit so that it shows up better. Not sure why it showed up so dark before. Strong Rad 16:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Ya know, ol' Happy Trees was a 'Nam vet... I think that should be incorporated into the caption. (I always wanted to see him crack on the show and start mixing some Asian Yellow with Agent Orange) Conditional For. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Against: The Joy of Killing ought to relate to The Joy of Cooking somehow. Also, the image isn't very funny. --Sirgwax (talk) 21:32, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Having been reminded that in fact, the Joy of Painting is the reference, I retract my objections. I do think it could be made a slightly more obvious reference though (caption perhaps). --Sirgwax (talk) 20:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
??? Why? It relates to the Joy of Painting....Strong Rad 01:13, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
I reject your reality and substitute my own! Actually, I think you either get this one or you don't, and no amount of prompting for laughter will help. Strong Rad 12:50, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Mix some Pink-o Commie with Olive drab and you get a happy little For that's right, RadicalX is back bitches!--Sir SlackerboyaCUNVFH (talk) 15:27, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
For What the hell? You kids are clearly too young or foreign to understand this joke. It's extremely funny, and the article is even funnier than the image. The Joy of Cooking was a direct name rip off from The Joy of Painting, along with others. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 07:06, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
For Awesome. --Teapot 18:59, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm against its featuring. I do know the show, and I do think it's funny, but I don't think it's front page material. --Boy Toybitch at me 22:00, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
For I can hear Bob Ross from the great beyond "Its your world, your massacre, and you can kill as many people as you want." Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 01:20, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
That's Beautiful, Prettiest...I just added that quote to the Joy of Killing page...Strong Rad 01:59, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
'"For'" This is absolutely hilarious Unsigned Strong Rad 12:49, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
For. Mr. Ross may only be recognisable to a certain demographic, but I am a member, and I do like this.--Winston 14:39, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
For, and I shall derive joy from killing all who vote otherwise. --Andrusi 22:18, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Against As an in-joke, it's really funny (and well made), but I can't imagine people that haven't seen the others will understand it. In any case, there should probably be an article for these pictures (something about a brave group of uncyclopedian rebels fighting a war against the evil foundation, aided by teddybears). Doug 03:25, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Comment: I like this one, it's funny. However, without a wikideathstar, it is a slightly confusing in-joke, as Doug mentions above. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 03:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Comment: I'll vote for it if someone gives it a suitable description. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 22:10, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Conditional for - add more symbols to the walls to make it look more like a Wiki. --80.195.22.150 09:58, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
For. In-jokes are the best jokes. --KATIE!! 20:45, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
For see, THIS is new, all the other ones, just no. new jokes,or at least variations like this one, PLEASE!!!--Nappy The Quarryman 07:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Against: in the context of the other ones, this is good but it doesn't have enough funny as a standalone image to warrant featuring. --Sirgwax (talk) 17:13, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Against, until. Improve this picture, make the puzzle pieces smaller, and then I'll vote for it. --Boy Toybitch at me 23:04, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
For: This rules! (24.207.91.40 04:59, 2 February 2006 (UTC))
Against. The joke has got so out of hand, it's lost the original "funny". --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFUF@H|VFP|+S 22:49, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Comment If by "out of hand" you mean "funny", and by "it's lost the original "'funny'", you mean "It should be continued," I concur.--S P I N N I E 06:37, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Great, this shit is headed for the number one spot! ANIDNMENOSCWICZ 19:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Against. The others were better. --OsirisX 01:18, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
For: This is head ans shoulders above the rest, the best one.
For. This is just cool!(Uncyclopedian 00:51, 6 February 2006 (UTC))
Against there's obviously some in-joke here that I'm missing because I've not be on here for a while, and if I don't get it, I think a lot of other people won't either. Sir Carlos the MeanCUNVFPCSCMCUNT (talk) 01:58, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Against Doesn't look much like the Wikipedia logo. The Third one is best, I accidently clicked the edit on the picture when trying to vote! Then my browser crashed --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:51, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
For. I saw it in new images a while back. I thought it was funny. ---Rev. Isra(talk) 11:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Against. I like the pic but I don't think it's funny. --Boy Toybitch at me 16:16, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Weak for This one also caught my eye. It's well done, and it's funny if you're not paying attention for a moment, then figure out he's not actually eating raspberries. -- Bradaphraser 18:17, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
For Pretty funny. --—rc(t) 03:04, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
For I got a good laugh out of that one after I realized what was going on. --Mosquitopsu 15:19, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Comment. I'm stupid. What's he really eating? It just looks like a bunch of red balls, with blood around them. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 00:24, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Weak Againstits just a polar bear eating something dead and bloody with raspberries photoshopped on top, is this some joke for people who live in countrys with normal bears? --Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN3NotMBLK |_LG8+::: 00:37, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Weak against. The "censoring" effect is worth a smirk, but not much else. Plus, the blood's just too obvious to make the raspberries work -- my initial thought was "bloody snowballs?" when I saw it. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:19, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
FOREEEEE!!!!!--User:Golfer 1:58, 01 February 2006 (UTC)
ACK!!! You really have to read the article to have an appreciation for the pic. It's supposed to be a crappy, obvious photoshop job, that's what makes it funny. Based on that criteria (or maybe the fact that I did it???) I say FOR. -- – Mahroww a.k.a. Ernie “Aero-Toy” Smith 08:18, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Abstain until a far better comment is added.... --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFUF@H|VFP|+S 22:50, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
For - I just changed the caption... Better? -- c • > •cunwapquc? 17:21, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Comment Hey! You changed the caption...it draws attention ^^^away^^^ from the pic, not to it. HOW DARE YOU! Further discussion moved to Image_talk:Polarbear.jpg
Weak for Good, but why did you keep a piece of the kill under the bear?(24.207.91.40 04:59, 5 February 2006 (UTC))
Weak Against due to the new caption. Honestly, I like the caption given on its source page better than the suggested alternatives. --Algorithm (talk) 08:53, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
For this image with this caption. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 10:14, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
FOR!! He shot a 78-year-old man in the face!! ANIDNMENOSCWICZ 15:31, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
This is the sort of event that needs to be comemorated. An enthusiastic FOR, and let's hope he doesn't have the sense to retract any support he gives to the NRA. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:42, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
For. Oooh.. topical! Aaarrrggh 15:45, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Ah... the politics of shooting lawyers in the face. For.--<<>> 17:15, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Gotta love current event-related pics. Strong For. --—HinoaKUN(talk) 18:37, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
for but you might resize and reshade a few things--Nappy The Quarryman 04:58, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
weak for Sloppy, stupid, topical but I still laughed my ass off--Count of Monkey Crisco 17:52, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
For. Image could be better, but the caption's great. Though "Gun, Dick, gun!" ought to be "Shoot, Dick, shoot!" I'm not even a hunter, but I know better than to lower the gun to horizon level when hunting quail.--[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:45, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Strong Against: Sure, the VP shot someone, sure that's funny but this image is too poorly done to deserve featuring. Also, a month from now it won't be funny anymore. --Sirgwax (talk) 20:11, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Against. It doesn't please me. --Boy Toybitch at me 21:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Conditional for: I like the image a lot but I dislike the caption equally much. Change the caption and it'll be golden. --Sirgwax (talk) 21:36, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Suggestions welcomed!--Rataube 00:53, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
For "The tragedy of open-source suicide bombings"? --Some user 01:03, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
For - even better than the Lego Mohammed. --OsirisX 07:00, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
BLASPHEMY wtf... is that supposed to be a piccy of Mohammed?? This brings Uncyclopedia to a new low... how about this FUCK SOPH.... This entry was finished by the guy sitting next to him... he sits in a pile of ashes on the floor as he got struck by lighteningANIDNMENOSCWICZ 19:54, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
For, caption could still use improvement, but no ideas here... Anon32 14:38, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
For "This blatant desecration of Mohammed's gay twin, Faggotmed, enraged gay Muslims worldwide" --Jester 03:21, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
If not yoet done, correct spelling error of "direspect" on main page.--81.228.207.191 13:21, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Nominate and Vote. Funnier than any of the other current nominations.--Rataube 13:53, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
For. It's funny because it's true - Lunar_Yeti
For. I believe this is an actual picture. ANIDNMENOSCWICZ 15:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Weak For Some of the heads don't look correct, but other then that yes it's sorta funny --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 15:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
For - but the article it's on needs expanding, and it might be funnier if at least one person (not necessarily Bush himself; maybe the guy in back?) was not wearing a furry mask. --Some user 16:13, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Against, until. What's with the wave of poorly done pictures? Make it look like the heads are actually attached to the bodies, then we'll see. --Boy Toybitch at me 16:32, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
For. What the heck. If no-one else cares, why should I? --Boy Toybitch at me 16:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
For!!!!! Hilarious!(24.207.91.40 16:49, 5 February 2006 (UTC))
Likely sock. --—rc(t) 06:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
For Needs a link in the blurb, but otherwise pretty good stuff.<<>>17:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
For. I like it, but WHAT THE HELL IS THAT GRAY THING AAAAAAAHHH GET IT OFF ME AAAAAAHHHH!!! (BTW, anyone else getting a strong Avengers: The Movie vibe from this?) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:46, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
For Very clever --Jester 18:42, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
For Nominate this already!!!!(142.22.16.57 18:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC))