{{vfp|BOTM.jpg|size=225px|name|Benson of the Month Badge|caption=The [[Forum:BENSON NEEDS SUPPORT TO BE N00B OF THE MONTH|Benson of the Month]] award is one of the most highly prestigious and coveted awards in all of Uncyclopedia, and is so rare that only [[User:Benson|one person]] has ever won it.|credit=Hrodulf|score=+0 CAPITAL LETTERS}}
−
'''NomFor'''. Even if you don't support HIS MAJESTY, you must admit this is a sweet badge, and a great forum topic to boot. --{{User:Nintendorulez/sig2}} 04:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)<br>
−
'''For''' Just because (let's see if we all get banned for this little bit of VFP folderol). --[[User:Hrodulf|Hrodulf]] 04:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
−
*'''No'''. Just, no. Even if I cared about "he who speaks in all-caps", and I don't, the pic doesn't look like a badge. VFP is for the best, the funniest, and whatnot; not the ''Benson''ist.--{{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 04:35, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
−
*'''STRONGEST POSSIBLE AGAINST''' BENSON HAS LONG SINCE LOST HIS CHARM. {{User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig}} 04:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
−
*'''Comment''' I know this has no chance of winning, I just want to see if I can get banned again over meaningless bullshit. --[[User:Hrodulf|Hrodulf]] 04:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
−
*:Gunning for UGotM?--{{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 05:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
−
*'''Comment''' I prefer to think of it as seeing how little it takes to anger the mindless wasps' nest and trigger the inevitable, unfunny, disproportionate and predictable reaction. Hm, so in other words, yes, I suppose.--[[User:Hrodulf|Hrodulf]] 05:08, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Nominate an image you find excellent. Use {{vfp|image=Imagename.jpg|size=123px|name=The Nominated Image|caption=Blabla '''[[link]]''' |credit=ImageCreator|score (optional)}}. Make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or the "your signature with timestamp" button on the edit screen.
You may nominate up to two of your own images per week. No more. You can nominate as many images by other people as you want.
Voting: use "For" or "Against" (or some clear iteration) in bold type to specify your vote. Comments are allowed, but excessive discussion/argument is not. Use the image's talk page for that.
Please submit only ORIGINAL IMAGES to VFP. Images from elsewhere on the Internet can be used on articles, but will not be featured.
Unmanipulated as well as photoshopped images are allowed as long as they are original.
When nominating an image, you may place {{VFP}} on the image page.
Do not remove or archive nominations. Loser admins will see to that.
You can see all previously featured images here, or on the archived voting pages: 1, 2, 3, 4.
Please read HowTo:Get Your Image Featured before nominating your own image. You are also encouraged to submit your image to Image Review for peer opinions before you list it on VFP.
Also, please remember we are trying to feature images, not tell everyone how much they suck. Take it elsewhere, and instead of pissing and moaning, nominate a picture you like.
Nom and For Just cuz I love this pic. Jaybenad 01:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Comment This should be a png. (Or a better-encoded jpg.) If BENSON fixes this, I'll certainly probably vote for, and if not, I'll only probably maybe vote for. --monika 01:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
FOR How can BENSON not vote for his own puny picture? Benson 02:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Comment Am I stupid because I don't get the caption? —rc(t) 02:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
I just assumed that it was random humor without a real point...so I guess I'm stupid too. --SirZombiebaron 02:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Upon reading the article, I've discovered that it is the whale that eats Mexicans, not the Republican Party, as I originally parsed it. Caption could use fixing. --monika 03:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
I did a simple fix that makes your interpritation old and no longer possible, I hope. --SirZombiebaron 03:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
FOR! HOW CAN I NOT VOTE FOR A PICTURE MADE BY BENSON? --GeneralInsineratehymn 02:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Let me point out that it is commonly accepted practice that we are not voting for users, but for the images they make/made. --SirZombiebaron 03:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Against with the caption it makes no sense, but w/o it the pic is competing w/parodies that are better (like the one w/Cthulhu).--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 04:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
against how can i not vote for a picture made by benson? --SirZombiebaron 05:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Spawn Wars - A Newt Hop: Proving that Yoda is not the most famous frog faced Jedi, Obiwan Keroppi was George Lucas' first attempt to tap into the lucrative Japanese market.
N+F I like this, it made me laugh which is always a bonus. Also would be nice to see a few more cartoon images nommed in here, we have so many "photoshopped images", it would make a nice change. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 0:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For, because I like Sanrio? --monika 01:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Whore what do you expect from me, eh? --SirZombiebaron 01:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
For 01:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
For, although I just woke up and, sadly, left my bag of witty comments in dreamland.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 04:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Sadly, Against - For now. The plain white background is bugging me. Do sumtin' 'bout that. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 06:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
If you have a suggestion I'd love to hear it. --SirZombiebaron 08:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Completely unrelated suggestion: How does he look with about three pixels of neck? --monika 12:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Alot worse, truse me I played around with the neck for hours. --SirZombiebaron 18:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Just something Star Wars-esque, preferably from the Clone Wars cartoon. Anything but the white, the white bugs me. Also, you're gonna get banned again if you keep using "alot". --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 04:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Nah. Pasting George W. Bush his face on bin lades has been done ad nauseum. --Vosnul 22:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Strong for. I don't know much about Photoshop, but I know what I like. And it would be perfect for December.--Procopius 15:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
ForSure its just a face swap, but this one is done well. --SirZombiebaron 16:15, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
I like it. It is an exceptionally good picture. At least, by my standards. --The Rt. Hon.BarryCMUN(Symposium!)Sigh.Double Sigh. 21:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Against. The Islamic humour is wearing thin, with me at least. We just did the Mohammad cinnamon bun head, can we move on now? Ahoy! I see new and funny ha-ha's just over that ridge. :) ~ T. (talk) 06:20, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Nom + For This is a seriously well made image and is pretty funny; a game about parasitic tapeworms firing at each other with “shitguns” inside a human's intestines. Weri long wang 14:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Conditional For Good image, crap caption. If someone improves the caption, consider this a for.--Kenmcfa 17:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
FOR, by the way.--Vosnul 22:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Against While it works well within its article, its barely funny at low resolution (where I can barely see that the things are worms), and I don't understand the word "Nematode". --SirZombiebaron 23:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Against, as Zb (less the bit about not knowing about nematodes. I know nematodes 'cause of their cameos on Spongebob) --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 03:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
For Oh, the hours I whiled away playing Worms 2 back in the day. It does need an actual caption though. —rc(t) 03:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
No way. -- Sir CHolla | CUN 06:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
FOR Very well made, it feels like you could actually be looking at a screenshot from (Nematode) Worms 2. On the issue of the anatomical validity of the argument (does this really matter?), the rugae of the intestinal wall have a vaguely similar structure to the gyri of the brain, and in the cartoony background used the two would likely be indistinguishable RossMM 09:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
For, cos although it's not that funny out of the context of the article it is very well made indeed - jack mort |cunt| talk - 01:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
For; long have I pondered this image, and I came to the conclusion that the "pseudo-tiling" and such are nice work. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 19:46, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
N&F - Fingerlickin' good..... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 20:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I know someone who worked in KFC and they said this sort of thing actually happened... maybe. -- Hindleyite 20:39, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. Wasnt this nommed before...? -- Sir CHolla | CUN 23:23, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Comment It was but it was a different version. Similar but not the same at all. 23:26, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Corn, Please. How is that a reason for voting against? Maybe if you had said "It was nommed before, and it was crap then and it is crap now" but basing you're vote off something that once happened has nothing to do with the image it self, which ulimately is what we are voting upon. --SirZombiebaron 13:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
For. that's frickin' hilarious... also, what has a different version being nommed got to do with your voting against it you miserable hater? :P --OliproAnchorKUN (Harass) 23:35, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Comment -I didnt know it was a different version, but I voted against the concept last time. Hey, dont hate the player hate the game... -- Sir CHolla | CUN 23:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. However, the "Foul tasting fowl" is really great. I often work off those words, since I hate fowl. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 23:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
For fried boxes.--<<>> 00:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
for Heh, heh.--The One and OnlyCzarYah 05:23, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Even though VFP logic would suggest that I flame it into the fiery pits of fchking hell for all the wrong reasons, since that logic is the most inconsequent form of reason I have have ever come across, I vote For. - Vosnul 08:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
for passes the chuckle test.-- sannse (talk) 00:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
For because Tom needs to be upgraded to a Commander of the Order. 1337ness! --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 05:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
For - WTF? --Micoolio101 07:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
For Wow, crazy!!! --Mathgeek747 01:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
For. It makes me hungry...! 12:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
For. For the record, I was under the impression that I had already vote for this. I'm not just voting because they told me to... really. t o m p k i n s blah.ﺞوﻦוףהՃՄண்ஸފއހวอฏม+տtrade websites 00:50, 2 November 2006 (UTC)