• Sign below an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
  • Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
  • IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
  • Unsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be ignored, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or the "your signature with timestamp" button on the edit screen.
  • You may nominate and vote for your own articles if you so choose - please note it on your nomination.
  • When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the entry using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
• Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
• Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must be at least a week old before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time.

VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.

Adventure gamebook

• Self-nom and for - I know that the format is funny, but what about the rest of the article? --Nydas 07:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - I came here through a secret door. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy

(Bleat) 09:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• For. Innovative format, although I expected the content to be a bit more encyclopedic. -- Colonel Swordman 12:36, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Cancer (beverage)

• Nominated and For --Mr Gridenko 11:28, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Committee of Letters

• Self-Nominate and for.I think it's one of the funniest articles I myself have done, so just thought I'll put it out there.--wikiwow 18:25, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• 'For.' - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I read that article myself, it wasn't very funny at all. SonicChao 23:46, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Three, hmmm --HP talk 00:19, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against I.N.C.O.M.P.R.E.H.E.N.S.I.B.L.E --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 09:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Funny; no. A load of shit; yes. --Mr Gridenko 11:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

OMG Ball

• Nominate/for --User:Nintendorulez 01:02, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• very much For - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 12:22, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• against. It's coherent and written well enough but it just doesn't make me laugh. --[[--InfiniteMonkey 23:28, 29 May 2006 (UTC)]] 23:23, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. A nicely written non-joke --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 10:06, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Is this a joke, or just geek stuff? OMGWTFBBQ!!! LOLOLZ!!!1!!!ONE!!!, etc. -- Colonel Swordman 12:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Game: Game Online

• Nomination and for.--ThatGuy 22:00, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Very very very strong for. 'Bout time this gets nommed... --User:Nintendorulez 01:02, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I know I'm probably alone in this, but I never really liked Game Online. --Emmzee (flame me here)
• For Hah! Now it's one more For vote than last time! --Kalir, Savant of Utter Foolishness! _{(yell at me)} 20:06, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Uhm, how 'bout some real articles, folks? ~ T. (talk) 21:56, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I found many grammar mistakes in it. --Sbluen 08:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Don't take this the wrong way - it's just a sympathy vote. -- Colonel Swordman 12:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Luke Skywalker

• Self-nom + for - week-old rewrite now. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 14:25, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 14:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. --[[--InfiniteMonkey 23:28, 29 May 2006 (UTC)]] 23:25, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. This is a sympathy vote for a nice try. Seriously, the article is nowhere near VFH material, otherwise I'd have put all my articles here for a feature (see [1], [2], [3] and [4]). -- Colonel Swordman 13:12, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Get Banned

• For: LOL. This is teh funnay. - unsigned vote
• For. Hasn't this been nominated recently? - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 04:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Yes, as a matter of fact it was. Against Modusoperandi 04:47, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• For the record, this has been nommed by a different user each time. Third trip down the aisle, always always left standing at the altar. ~ T. (talk) 10:22, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• For ; I have my reasons, such as I am anti-Skub --ccdimeanc | cantabria 11:10, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. it's not really.... good. or an article - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 14:44, 28 May 2006
• For good idea, seriously - unsigned vote

(UTC)

• For <3 this article. --User:Nintendorulez 01:08, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. This article has been improved with pictures. --Sbluen 20:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Oh, fine. The pictures help a lot. --Hobelhouse 23:55, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Just seems like a lot of bitching about annoying uncyclopedia users.--InfiniteMonkey 01:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against  c • > • cunwapquc? 04:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Perfect Disaster

• Nomination and strong for. I seriously can't believe this wasn't nominated earlier. --So So 15:25, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Wish I'd written this FreeMorpheme 15:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Thppbt! --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~16:34, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. superb - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 20:28, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, can't wait for Perfect Disaster II: Disaster Modusoperandi 02:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• 4, Satirical Point of View at its finest. --L 10:44, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Perfect Disaster IV - came very high on my voting in the recent Poo Lit Surprise. Brilliant article, deserves double-featuring -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 13:28, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Good satire, well written--InfiniteMonkey 23:32, 29 May 2006 (UTC).
• For, sequel! (or however its speeled) --HP talk 00:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• LOL! I didn't get a chance to fully read it, but I love what I caught. --PiOfFive 03:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Absolute For - Brilliant execution to a novel idea and an excellent counterpoint to Imperfect Disaster, which would occur if this article were not featured. --Imrealized 07:06, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Not enough links --Sbluen 08:26, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Final Fantasy I

• Four FF1's my favorite game, and the article's funny --Scorchiolio 01:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Nomination plus four because it's funny. (Because I actually read it.) --Bleachie talc 19:15, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I wrote a good bit of it, and almost wrote a small bit more. --Kalir, Novice Burninator _{(offer instruction)} 19:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - nicely done article --Nydas 20:13, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - The section on spells is too long though, maybe someone could change that --Cdrdude 00:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. This is way too long, but damned if it isn't funny.--<<>> 02:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• HRM4! --L 06:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• FOR! Ye gods I haven't seen an article as good as this in a while. Especially the spells section. The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a glycerin. 07:57, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Wow, I made it all the way through a long article? It was that funny? Impressive. -- Rei 16:00, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - FFII was the best game, IMO. And it's amazing how well this article avoids copying 8 Bit Theater. --User:Nintendorulez 20:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 22:40, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. The spells section is hilarious, I don't care how long it is. --Zyrac 16:02, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against but my 13 year-old stepson that it was great. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:07, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

asylum

• Nominate and For, because I like to see him fail. Not even funny. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 17:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• FOR I needed instructions, see below, to understand this one -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 18:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against It's a bit disheveled, writing could me more better qualities, maybe I'll give it a stab an fixing her up if JackMort doesn't beat me to it. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 20:13, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against, not bad, but not good enough for VFHModusoperandi 21:21, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For This article was on my shortlist for Best Article when I was a judge in the Poo Lit Surprise. From the notes I made then:

First impression: Dictionary lemma, on second thoughts with a twist of inversion included
(the  sane are inside the asylum)
Originality: excellent
Use of language: very good
Use of images: to the point, though monotonous. They add to the atmosphere.
Overall rating: 9 plus
Comment: A third level of wordplay just struck me: asylum can also mean "shelter" 
or "place of  refuge". This article disturbs me. What if the reversal is true ?

--di Mario 21:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

• Against. This article isn't horrible, but it's not funny, either.--<<>> 00:15, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

• For. OK HAPPY JACKMORT!?!?!?! --208.60.233.121 00:44, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Cut the chatter a little bit, eh? There's a big red banner at the top of this page saying as much. —rc (t) 03:57, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

yuss, blame the drink, all gone now, excepet for this bit... - jack

• Against. In a few weeks, afer some more work, maybe. FreeMorpheme 15:57, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:10, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I didn't even read it... So HA!   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 04:53, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. could be reworked, but it hasn't yet :) --Olipro Anchor (Harass) 12:48, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --User:Nintendorulez 14:22, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

McDonald's

• Nominate and For. Not exaggerating, I almost fell to the floor in laughter, especially when I saw the Two Towers image and read the drive-thru part. --wikiwow 15:14, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

I am currently constructing a McDonald's reskin (a McReskin) that will feature to McDonald's article. So, no need for VFH.

--Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~16:54, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Well, I'm voting for it anyway. --L 06:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

I am currently constructing a McDonald's reskin (a McReskin) that will feature to McDonald's article. So, I will feature it.

--Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~12:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

You'll feature it, will you? What happens if your reskin never makes it to the front page? • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:58, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

• Strong For. I have only one thing to say about this article: HAHAHAHAHA!!! --The Stig | Abt me Rant 14:44, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Too long, and the humor content doesn't compensate for this.--<<>> 04:14, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:11, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Not exaggerating, I almost looked at the floor with indifference --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 10:21, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Obesity

• N+F Funny funny shit. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~13:20, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against - Not that funny. Cioclod 17:14, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Nah FreeMorpheme 17:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Shit doesn't make me laugh. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 18:46, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. cos you're clearly mean. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 18:57, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for, though it needs to be a little shorter and blame the obese for their condition more. Blaming the victim is awesome.--<<>> 04:10, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Laser

• Nomination and for. I found it funny, I actually laughed in places. The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a glycerin. 08:03, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against - I would rather vote for this article instead. -- Colonel Swordman 12:01, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against I think not. FreeMorpheme 17:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Austin Powers cried when he read this. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 18:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Cos i know it won't get featured but it's still not bad. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 18:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• FOR! Hahahahaha!! --L 06:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• For(i=0; i++; i>=0) Because I helped write it and it was lolage fun to do so ++HYPERFUKBOT 18:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. Funny in points, but too many references to (or perhaps just blatant rip-offs of) Austin Powers.--<<>> 04:04, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Pyramid Scheme

• Nominate and For signed by this guy user:24.20.154.4 at around 18:48, 24 May 2006.
• Yeah. --L 06:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. It does the business --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:57, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, helped me make lots of cash and it can help you, yes YOU, do the same. --OsirisX 08:32, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Reasons:

• The article hardly touches on the true nature of pyramid schemes.
• Even real scam artists are reluctant to use that many exclamation marks.
• In-joke is definitely one kind of the things that do not deserve to be featured.
• The article is almost a Dead End (lack of links).
• The article is even linked to a userpage, suggesting vanity.
• When I first saw the arctile (few hours ago), I even had the thought of rewriting it.
• Definitely not front-page material.

-- Colonel Swordman 11:45, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

• For Seems fine to me, pyramid scheme reworked as article, and the exclamatory tone is parodic of the excitable tone of a salesman. FreeMorpheme 12:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Nope, not working for me. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 18:44, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because yes. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 18:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. If it gets the nod, more people will join, and we'll end up all the wealthier! -- Rei 15:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --User:Nintendorulez 20:44, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. As much as I hate Col. Swordman's unneccesarily long argument, I have to agree with at least half of his points.--<<>> 03:59, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For Very funny, could use more links though Bitplane 01:44, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Allah: The Annotated Version

• Nominate and For I really liked this one! MwM 09:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Comment, it was nominated recently and failed Modusoperandi 15:18, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

• For...still Modusoperandi 18:13, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. How did I miss that last vote? --Jordanus 15:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Still. ~ T. (talk) 16:35, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• No Vote: The Annotated Version. Note: This article sucks. --ENeGMA 19:13, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against It was hurtful to the eyes and children in central Irak grow up to be lawyers b/c of this.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 22:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Why does everyone take this to be anti-Islam? It's more anti-Fundy Christian than anything else. --Jordanus 22:33, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I've typed it before and I'll type it again "It's satire, but not funny satire." The article also tries to tell the reader that it is funny, no article should have to do this.--Witt E, 06:52, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I think this would work well on the front page, and the 'meta-satire' is a neat trick against rampant seriosity. But don't reveal my name and address, please. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:33, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• I like it, and I really like the idea of annotating an article, making jokes from jokes, so For. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 18:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For for the same reasons as the people above. Arzikl 00:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. This is like Fisher Price: A Retrospective, only not funny.--<<>> 03:44, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. If this is funny, then I'm a clog-dancing Dutchman. FreeMorpheme 12:18, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Ernest Hemingway's Cookery Corner

• Self nom. Just to see. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. This article made me chuckle. Considering how rarely I actually open my mouth upon finding something funny, consider it an achievement. --The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a glycerin. 09:41, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. This amused me, and, since I've never read Hemingway and therefore am sure I didn't get a lot of the jokes, that makes this a winner for me.--<<>> 05:01, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• For "Squeeze some ketchup out in a line. Roll up the bread nice and tight. That’s it. Man creates food." Go go gadget literary humor! —rc (t) 18:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• For You can't argue with this. Feel the quality in that cloth. FreeMorpheme 21:11, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• STRONG FOR -- LinkTheGameFreak ^{Bitch here} 22:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Another quality product from the pen of Hardwick. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 15:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• For It made me hunger for wasp. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 22:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Food is good. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 23:57, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against it's okay, but it's no [Bouncy Castle]. Plus self noms annoy me Modusoperandi 00:49, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Charming article and now Modusoperandi's vote is neutralized. Its like two votes in one. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 17:44, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Against- Funny at times, but needs much more work before it can be accepted as a featured article. There are only about 3 recipes on there- hardly enough to call it a full article. The Llama Llover
• For. OMGTF ROFLROFL WWJD! yeah well good. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 18:21, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For.--InfiniteMonkey 23:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Like the noble clown, it charges into the circus ring, only to die on the matador's sword, because it's quite a nasty circus. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 10:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Trojan War

• Nomination... An excellent article, very humorous, and plenty of pictures to make the reader continue reading. Contains no factual information whatsoever, besides the fact that Hector dies. And, yes, a self-nomination.
• For. Very funny article. Love it. Llama Llover
• For Llama? are you the same guy who nom'ed it? Good show. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 09:58, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• For can we have this one laminated? --HP talk 13:46, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Abstain. Could have been more polished... - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 13:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Favours randomness over wit FreeMorpheme 19:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against - for the same reason, too random. The basics of the Iliad are in place but it needs to be sharper. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 04:13, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Why not? Efitu (TW@) 21:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.150.7.40 (talk • contribs) May 23 2006

Vote by IP. --Splaka

• For. This actually amused me.--<<>> 04:58, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against.--Rataube 20:46, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• FOR! -- LinkTheGameFreak ^{Bitch here} 22:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - MwM 16:37, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Remember, Beginners Guide: be funny, not stupid. But gets an A for effort! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Hysterical. --Rspaster
• Trojan For! Ajax got me, I didn't see that coming.--Witt E, 02:13, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Nice! --L 06:13, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Nice? Sandra Dee is nice. This article is not. No Faster Pussycat Kill Kill
• For. It might be the drink talking but I think on this occasion the randomness works. it joins up, it's not so illogical. Whatever, it made me laugh, everything else is just masturbation. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 18:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Not coherent enough, needs cleanup.--Anon32 00:02, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Too much random celebrity name-dropping, too random.--InfiniteMonkey 23:36, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. WTF? How did this get nominated? --Mushroom 11:53, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

White Slave Movement

• Self Nom and for I really like this idea. Perhaps it could be expanded. --stephensface 02:25, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - Great Concept Das Boot 06:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Concur and For an excellent piece of work. --epynephrin 14:36, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. This amused me, I must confess.--<<>> 15:10, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 03:14, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Gotta keep those honkeys in their place! --Captain Finding Nemo 03:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. What he said.^^^ --The Stig | Abt me Rant 13:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• For! Oh, yeah...Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• weak for. The writing didn't really grab me, but the idea is good. - jack mort | cunt | talk - _ 18:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Fer Poetic justice, anyone? --Kalir, Savant of Utter Foolishness! _{(yell at me)} 05:41, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Patriotism

• Nom + For-Great collaboration on this rewrite--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 19:28, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ T. (talk) 20:05, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Haha I have a few of those awards. Severian 02:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Everybody loves Patriotism. Well, everyone but the Commies.--<<>> 04:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For King and Country! -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 18:45, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment And here I didn't even know you people HAD a King...--<<>> 15:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Vague for --L 07:30, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• For you gotta love those flags! --Plyr3005 00:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Yeah, I know - the chicks are hot, but I really had a hard time deciphering the content. Sorry! -- Colonel Swordman 14:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. you seem to be mocking the midlessness and hypocracy of patriotism, also there are women in swimwear. I didn't read the rest, i'm not even literate. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 18:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Same reason as Jack, but also funny. --Emmzee, Destroyer of Goats (yell at me)
• For. So... err... Is this on the merit of the article, or the quality of the chicks in dress? --Olipro Anchor (Harass) 18:48, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Decapitation Disease

Self-nom and for. --Emmzee 14:20, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

• For. Fine, have your funny article featured. SEE IF I CARE!!!!--<<>> 14:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Aye, tis the awesome...-ness. Demonbob 22:31, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Future Rula 17:40, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For People have told me that's what they thought "Caputosis" meant. ~CaputosistheHorrible21:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For About time a good article showed up on VFH. Excellent. --ENeGMA 22:57, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• ick For --HP talk 13:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Raven_1959 | Bleep 14:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Yes good *nod* - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 18:07, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --Flabius-Danner 20:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. The worst part of the disease is the instant separation of the head from the neck. --Sbluen 21:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --stephensface 23:32, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• This idea is stupid. Brilliantly stupid. Strong For.--InfiniteMonkey 23:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Obesity Fines

• Self Nomination and For - Pointless Background Info you're probably not interested in: I got the idea for this article when I got pulled over by a morbidly obese cop for doing 122km/h. Then I fantasised about turning the tables on him, and thus, this article was born. Enjoy. Das Boot 04:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, this is something we desperatly need in our ever increasing fat society. --OsirisX 08:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For--- Jaques Pirat ^{IS NOT FRENCH!} _{TP, F@H} 11:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For but I also took the liberty of adding a section on George W. Bush's Obesity Tax program. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 12:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for. This article is too long, but I can't argue with the funny. It's got "it".--<<>> 14:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. Meh. I laughed at the picture at the top, though. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~14:18, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 03:10, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Not too bad - actually, I kind of like it. -- Colonel Swordman 12:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's good, and clever, doesn't really grab you but yeah... - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 18:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Special:Log/delete

• N+F: seeing that Main Page isn't going to make it... I think it's a hilarious example of comic relief, and I had much rejoincing when reading deletion... er, huffing summaries. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 07:20, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --OsirisX 08:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete!; the whole thing contains nothing but bad memories. --DW ^III 10:19, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I WILL go for this one, as the deletion log summaries are often some of the best quality work at the site. :p--<<>> 14:45, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Actually, your self-deprecating edit summaries when you have difficulty typing an error-free message (like to RC, re: the new Yahoo! design) are quite amusing as well. :) ~ T. (talk) 14:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Glad to contribute ;)--<<>> 17:22, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

• For, just because I'm an ass right now. ~CaputosistheHorrible21:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, but Special:Log/block is funnier. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 00:45, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for. I think list articles are a bit dry. --L 07:17, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, funny stuff. - Surreal Hamster 03:14, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, Relevance to the government bludging even more money out of the average Kiwi User:Guru 21:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC) (actually posted by 222.152.81.215)
  • Comment:- I think you voted for the wrong article - see above. Das Boot 04:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I'd prefer the mainpage or VFH, but I'm glad that one of these gimmicks can be on the front page at least once, specially after so many failed nominations.--Rataube 16:00, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. This page has new deletion log summaries every day. --Sbluen 17:59, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against - I'd prefer to see real articles get featured. 219.89.25.56 05:16, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. One of the most frequently updated articles - hours of amusement can be had with this. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 08:07, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against - - Real Articles Please!! Das Boot 04:57, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I mourn the loss of the "Feature the Main Page Campaign", but look forward to featuring VFH :) --ZB 01:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• No thanks. There are too many real, better alternatives here on VFH. ~   t o d d k i n s  blah. ﻙﻭﻥ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ Build Tompkins' Userpage 10:26, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• No way. Is this a joke, or the end of Uncyclopedia? - unsigned vote

• Now it is. -- Colonel Swordman 14:14, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

• Against, It is funny, undeniably, but i don't think it needs featured, it's just a page on uncyc, it shouldn't be featured any more than this page should. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 18:02, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment "it shouldn't be featured any more than this page should." sounds like a plan! --ZB 00:00, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

• Yeah, I'll nom this. --User:Nintendorulez 20:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

• For. Delete summaries are HILARIOUS. --User:Nintendorulez 20:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against, it's a one-note joke that isn't all that funny Modusoperandi 03:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Not funny. Not supposed to be funny. It's a system tool, not a humorous article. Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~16:18, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. About as funny as a balance sheet --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 10:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Handgun

• Nominate and For. A fine article. FreeMorpheme 18:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I was, however, the author. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 18:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against as puns are the lowest form of humour Modusoperandi 20:12, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

so's your face - jack

I think that I've just been zinged. Colour me...apathetic... Modusoperandi 22:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

• For. FEATURE! - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 20:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For its so basic, why hasn't it been done before? Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 21:03, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For!. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 22:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against I knew what the joke was going to be before I even opened the article. 'Hand Grenade' was funnier and done first. --ENeGMA 20:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Good article Das Boot 05:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Just isn't hitting me with the "funnae".--<<>> 14:31, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Good stuff.--Emmzee 22:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For i think the single barrel variety is more common... Stephensface 02:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Nifty. Reminds me of Air Guitar. --L 07:24, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 03:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Highly original, I like it! --Olipro Anchor (Harass) 12:26, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ I like the single-action models myself. The moving thumb really lets people know that I've blown their head off for their stupid driving. ~ T. (talk) 09:39, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I'm surprised I hadn't noticed this before, as I frequent VFH every day I can. User:Yuri von-Juan/sig 09:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. That's what people are supposed to vote for. -- Colonel Swordman 12:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Handy. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 12:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Awesome. Arzikl 00:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, Jack Handy would have been proud...--HP talk 00:07, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Segregation

• Nominate and For because PLS should dominate the clearly inferior non-PLS articles on the front page. (also it's a great article) --EvilZak 18:50, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Heh, this was going to be my next nomination but you beat me to it. —rc (t) 19:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For It's a good, funny idea, but it's a bit short. - Lenin & McCarthy 19:22, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Short but sweet, and PLS to beat Modusoperandi 19:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Oh, absolutely. I loved this one.--<<>> 19:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For- I wish it was longer, but it's still great!--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 21:05, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for Its a great base, but it needs to explore what happens to the Pure white when something hot and red gets thrown in with them - the stain of miscoloration. FOR!Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:42, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Okay, seeing the support for this article, I must now expand it to win over those wary of its shortness. Strong Rad 15:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Wow - very witty! --Jester 02:08, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Great - very me. --Witt E, 21:40, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --Spin 23:11, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Not yet. Needs more work. Good start though.--Anon32 00:39, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For now that it's been improved.--Anon32 00:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Against since it's hasn't actually been improved.--Anon32 00:59, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. A good article, but I think a lot more could be written on this topic. Bloopy 08:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for. A nice, meaty follow-up piece to Folding@home, but a little short. ~ T. (talk) 13:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Well written and clever in spots, but to me the overall concept is kind of cheesy. --So So 03:12, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. yé! - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 16:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

*For, funniest article i've read in a while. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 16:58, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Jack, I love you as much as the next guy, but only one for vote per article, please. :)--<<>> 00:07, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

• Strong, yet supple for. Some damned fine rightin', fer them's want to reed a funy artikel. LMSO, silently of course. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 04:41, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Sbluen 20:40, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Orgasam --ZB 01:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --TKF 21:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Oscar Mayer

• Nom and For more inuendo. -- Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 13:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• For (and thank you for nominating it). ~ T. (talk) 10:14, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Splendid. --Hobelhouse 18:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• For this fine addition to the local meat market. --Carlb 00:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For all its meat-by-product wholesomeness(!). --DWIII OUN CUN 01:29, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Reminds me of sexual inuendo. No, not the article, I mean the thingy.--<<>> 03:48, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For who would've ever thought mechanically separated chicken and assorted beef would be so sexy. --Severian 04:44, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. That first quote is a great prelude to an awesome article.--Witt E, 05:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 08:14, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Almost as good as Bouncy Castle. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:24, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Almost as good as Bouncy Castle. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 22:10, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Funny. --So So 10:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Is this a record for most unanimous votes so far? --User:Nintendorulez 19:35, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against No.-- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 21:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Gibberish but also good. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 16:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Laughed my love handles off! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 15:09, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Yes, I am a scheme breaking asshole. --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ 02:39, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For but I do wish it would have unlocked the mysteries of olive loaf for me. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 21:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For the Weiner Man -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 18:47, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against, for the reason that it's toooooooooo American. -- Colonel Swordman 12:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - how can it be too American? The author is Canadian...... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• For For For! Hilariously suggestive. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~16:30, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

John Cage

Nominate and Strong For - This is hysterical brilliance. It helps to know a little about Cage, but I think it'd be funny without that knowledge. Very well-written comedy. --Imrealized 07:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

• Silence... (Cough, cough.) ... ... ...For. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 07:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• 2+2 --Hubert Cumberdale 15:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIRM-A-TIVE --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• For, seeing as I wrote most of it. The only thing I know about John Cage is that he wrote 4'33", and that was enough to make it funny for me. --Spang 17:33, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Oh, and if you vote for, a keep in its VFD entry wouldn't go amiss. It won VFD. --Spang 23:00, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - nice addition to the composer pages :) --Lurgy 15:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. Man, this guy WAS high on kittens...--<<>> 18:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. Amusing, and 4' 33" is my favorite song so I must vote yes! -- Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 23:48, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - I like to say 'exuberant' often, not just for effect, but as a real descriptor. This writing is clever and exuberant, and made me chuckle. Well done, I say, well done. — Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l KUN VFH FP (Witty Remarkes) 15:17, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - I actually own a copy of Piano Falling Down Five Flights of Stairs in A Minor and it is some of his best work! Triddle 00:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• For - I've definietly heard 4'33" before. I haven't heard some of the others, but I was especially entertained by that section. --epynephrin 16:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Some good jokes (eg the extended dance remix of 4'33"), but it's quite badly written. Heaps of grammatical errors and sentences that don't make sense - including the first one of the article! -Conniption 10:32, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
• 2 squared This really is brilliant... --Johnfn 20:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Amusing. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 00:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Couldn't you work in a Mortal Kombat Johnny Cage reference?--SLACK...ah ah...he'll save everyone of us! 02:59, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Because I'm awkward. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:50, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because it zings with harmonious counterpoint.--Hardwick Fundlebuggy 05:29, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against This article had a LOT of natural potential, which was completely quashed by stupid kitten huffing references that had no relevance to the complete insanity of this already bfi person --Mindsunwound: (NS) Peek & Pie Here 15:02, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very good, affectionate, i didn't know who the fuck he was but it still made sense and ammused - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:35, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• FORE! Hilarious. I especially liked the part where the trumpets don't come in. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~ 16:31, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - I only wish he could have written a symphony for 10 people banging their heads against a wall in unison...A great article for the front page -- Sp1r1tofRad1o 02:50, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - the list of songs made me chuckle. --Nydas 09:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - brilliant --TKF 13:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Confusing --Mushroom 11:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I simply don't get the joke. Sorry! -- Colonel Swordman 12:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. It kept me entertained to the end. As such I feel we should burn something. Why are you looking at me like that? User:Yuri von-juan/sig 08:29, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• For A little obscure, but anyone who knows who John Cage is will absoutely piss themselves Jammygit
• Weak Against. It's ok..--Emmzee 02:27, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Previously Featured

Goa Tse

Featured —rc (t) 06:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Nominate. Nice riff on what you may have thought was an exhausted meme - David Gerard 17:29, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Nein. The very word "goatse" causes me to vomit. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 17:32, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Did you read the actual article, Sikon, or are you just subscribing to the Do NOT click any links! philosophy?--<<>> 17:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. This article is very, very well done. I just can't bring myself to vote for anything goatse-related for the front page. Especially after Yesterday...--<<>> 17:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I cannot in good concience keep this against vote on this article as this is probably the best article on this page right now. Abstain.--<<>> 04:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Also strong against. Rocky Mountain Oysters was bad enough, then sexual innuendo, can't we keep the front page SFW? --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 20:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

"SFW?" "So Fucking What?" (yes, I know.) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: It actually is relatively safe for work, you probably just don't have the time to "read" the "articles" you are "voting against" and recognize the clever "puns" that lie within. And it doesn't matter if it's Safe for work or not, all that matters is if it's funny, and this article is pretty damn funny (OH MY GOSH I SAID DAMN THIS DISCUSSION PAGE IS NO LONGER SAFE FOR WORK!!!) --TKF 21:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. I don't know if it is damn funny, but for a certainty it is damn low. "Rabbit digs the burrow"? Is this sort of smut really that amusing? How about a list of terms referring to woman's period? Is Uncyclopedia really about how witty people can get with genitalia and buttock and stuff? Pfft... I don't know what people think here, but VFH is really sending a message out there - a plain negative one. -- Colonel Swordman 14:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

• For.—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 23:28, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. --OsirisX 01:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Against. --Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH NS (Talk)^{[citation needed]} 01:55, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - I'm too lazy to click on the article link and want to read it on the front page. Guinness2702 02:04, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It could use some more content. -- – Mahroww a.k.a. Paddington D. Shufflebotham  08:22, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. So disgusting, so wrong. But I couldn't care less.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 17:24, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Biased but For -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 17:48, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Enhanced by Mhaille - me too steps out of the closet. -- Swami A. Suresh 03:49, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
• For with a smirking grin. --KATIE!! 13:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
• For want pie now --Willy on wheels! 12:43, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• For the quotes alone are hilarious :) --Huffers 03:06, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Too deep for me. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 20:30, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• For YES! good. an original take on goatse that won't make you gag. --JackMort 12:45, 10 March 2006 (GMT)
• For. A Goatse on every computer in every school by 2007. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:58, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against - In what appears to be a sadly predictable trend for me. Even though the subject manner is handled cleverly, it's still one big anal sex joke at the end of the day. — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 17:44, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak NEG-A-TIVE. I like this. I really do. It's smart, and I laughed. But I have to agree that the front page is starting to get too predictable in its display of crassness. I'm all for smutting it up, but too much of a good thing, and all that... maybe later. Yeah, definitely later. And no, not like that, you filthy bastards. I'm a trashcan. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. No Goatse!!!--Anon32 22:57, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• OH my fucking god, that is so disturbing! FOR! --POJoe!TALKCONTRIBSF@H 04:27, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Sure --Roger The Bum Full sig!
  <a href="http://rdoger6424.jaywebdesigns.com/recipient.php">psychotomimetic</a>
  CLICK HERE!!!!!!!! 11:33, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against:This article is funny, but for the front page..?--Claudius Prime 15:18, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. Subtle and funny: I like it. -- Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 13:17, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Jump on the bandwagon. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 19:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Against. This would require an NSFWArticle for it to be featured, and it would mean some workplaces could block Uncyclopedia from their servers. --Sir Velair Wight 04:37, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Very well written. Ethereal 08:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. I didn't want to like the page, but the quotes won me over. -Conniption 17:01, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• I haven't voted on this yet? What the hell? For. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 04:59, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It's goatse. Period. Full stop. Whatever. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:56, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Strong for I don't believe that this hasn't been featured --Roger The BUM MUN ⌥⌘⎋ F@H Complaints H4x0R M3! Euroipods! Norwegian Kanaaääaäaalääaaaäaaää Attack! 10:28, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Although I support Yeah - votes - this one is double. -- Swami A. Suresh 23:39, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

• • Comment Indeed it is... —rc (t) 04:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For ancient chineese secret? I just wish that the title wasn't so offensive --Mindsunwound: (NS) Peek & Pie Here 15:05, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Wholistic combination of the sacred and the profane --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 05:28, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Nice,Nice --Severian 19:00, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Rataube 21:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. I don't know what a goatse is, I know it isn't very funny outside this site, and this article is funny enuogh that I don't need to know.--Witt E, 05:23, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. how long has this thing been on this list? Ant to Nintendorulez, calm it or i'll have the feature Euroipods again. --Anidn Needs Ignorant Dumbasses to Not Meaninglessly Exile him from InterNet MeetingrOoms MUN FC4 ⌘ .az VforIRCop(HOLLA ATCHA BOY!) 03:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against  c • > • cunwapquc? 04:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 05:40, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Lenin & McCarthy 06:17, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• NO ~Cap'n SimzorzAr, Matey! 01:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. C'mon folks, it's not what you think. By the time I reached the "Great Works" section, I was laughing my ass off. Get over the title and read it. :) ~ T. (talk) 13:59, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I admit I was scared at first but this is frickin' hilarious. --Hobelhouse 17:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Surprisingly refreshing material on an old joke. --TKF 22:58, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Why haven't I voted for it yet? I dunno. Feature it already! • Spang • ☃ • talk • 06:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. (gag and vomit) Not that sick geek joke again... --Colonel Swordman 10:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Just to get it off the page already! —rc (t) 06:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Change a lightbulb

Featured —rc (t) 04:18, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

• Awesome - I know that I'm only supposed to nominate one article but this one is hella funny, too. --Sparky2002b 01:56, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, the general populous was in need of an article like this. --OsirisX 08:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Doubleplusfor, made me laugh so hard I cried.--Emmzee 14:26, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Beautiful. Another winner.--<<>> 14:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Anarchy on a bun. Swordmaster 16:55, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Oh Hell YES! ---Ximm the Odd, Defender of The Space Five Inches In Front of His Eyes -20:17, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Dunno what I could have done without it! Demonbob 00:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Now that's what I'm talkin' 'bout! A quality article! --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~14:25, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I was amused. --epynephrin 18:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, because it's absolutely wonderful! Cheer Bear*huggles* 21:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Funny. --ENeGMA 23:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, yes, yes, yes! --HP talk 14:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Of course, that's how you change a lightbulb! I've been doing it wrong for years!--Witt E, 02:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Fucking good. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 17:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• I was seriously tempted to add an against just so that it doesn't get all fors, but after reading it I realize it is a work of art. For. The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a glycerin.
• For. Why don't we have a howto namespace anyway?--Anon32 01:04, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Banana Skin Joke

Featured —rc (t) 03:14, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

• Nomination and For. A universally humorous gag. --Hindleyite Talk 11:38, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Long, but well done (and well-researched).--<<>> 18:23, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --L 03:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because the apple skin joke just isn't as funny. --Captain Finding Nemo 04:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Flabius-Danner 17:49, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, because I need to vote for something and this article made me laugh.--The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a glycerin. 09:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 10:35, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. I like it, but I feel it needs a little finessing. FreeMorpheme 20:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - Whoopee! Eventually, I laughed, I suffocated...--HP talk 00:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Indifferent eh.... Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 19:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• FOR. Really really very very good. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 20:08, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - One of the classic scandals of all time. Great Setup. >> Sp1r1tofRad1o 21:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - I wrote it so I promote it. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 22:57, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Hehe, bananas are always funny! For! Cheer Bear*huggles* 21:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Old joke. Not funny anymore. But how is this article so hillarious? Stephensface 20:50, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - good stuff. --Nydas 09:29, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. (cues the small group of woodland creatures) ~ T. (talk) 09:49, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against funny, but not funny -- TKF 23:00, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. funny --Mushroom 11:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Rataube 21:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I actually saw someone slip on a banana peel.--Witt E, 02:24, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Nice-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 02:49, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Colossus of Barbie

Featured —rc (t) 01:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

• Nomination and For. Great article.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:16, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I agree.--<<>> 23:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, as the resident Egyptian Deity, this article pleases me. --OsirisX 00:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• For and thanks ;-) Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:37, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Coolie, Colossus of Ken doesn't even compare. --Severian 02:03, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against. Good idea, but it's a mess. For - Lenin & McCarthy 06:52, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• For-Absolutely Wonderful--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 13:07, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against I didn't really think it was very funny. Amusing concept, but meh. --ENeGMA 21:30, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Very funny. Someone put a lot of good work into this. --Jester 00:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For but is it anatomically correct? --Mindsunwound: (NS) Peek & Pie Here 20:41, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 09:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. You can't go wrong with 2000 Kens.--Hardwick Fundlebuggy 16:32, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• For We need to highlight a feminist piece. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 03:50, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For  c • > • cunwapquc? 04:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ T. (talk) 13:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - Imrealized 17:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• I do --{{User:Suresh/sig}} 21:08, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against because of the image. (I voted against it on VFP, and I will do it again.) - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 04:11, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Yes, the first of the seven uncyc wonders of the world. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 16:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Cause the idea of a giant barbie scares me. --ZB 16:47, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Darling love, vote on the merits of the article, not your fear of a twenty-foot Vulva on a Barbie giantess. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 19:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Because it could have a twenty-foot vulva if it really existed. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 19:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Aye, it deserves to be featured. ~CaputosistheHorrible12:46, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Archives

• Archive 1
• Archive 2
• Archive 3
• Archive 4
• Archive 5

Awards, Decorations and Honours
	Awards	Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Admin Rank · Ninjastars
	Ranks & Honours	Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the moment Potatochopper of the Month Foolitzer Prize Writer of the Year · Uncyclopedian of the Year · RadicalX of the Year RYA · User Space Affiliations · Past Winners
	Limelight	VFH · VFP · Best of · Top Ten: 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · Hall of Shame
	Prix citron	Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year · Sandwich of the Month · FFS
	Events citron	Poo Lit Suprise · Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball · The Article Whisperer Happy Monkey Competition · Other competitions