Uncyclopedia:VFH/old

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:VFH(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 333: Line 333:
 
|nom=Uncle J
 
|nom=Uncle J
 
|scoretext= dead children
 
|scoretext= dead children
|fornumber=11
+
|fornumber=12
 
|for=
 
|for=
 
#'''nom and for ''': This is one of the funniest articles I've ever read --[[User:Uncle J|Uncle J]] 01:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
#'''nom and for ''': This is one of the funniest articles I've ever read --[[User:Uncle J|Uncle J]] 01:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Line 346: Line 346:
 
#'''Sure''' Me likely. --[[User:Dexter111344|Dexter111344]] 02:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
#'''Sure''' Me likely. --[[User:Dexter111344|Dexter111344]] 02:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 
#'''For'''--[[User:Dr. Fenwick|Dr. Fenwick]] 02:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 
#'''For'''--[[User:Dr. Fenwick|Dr. Fenwick]] 02:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  +
#'''For'''--Will Tomlinson
 
|againstnumber=1
 
|againstnumber=1
 
|against=
 
|against=

Revision as of 15:29, May 31, 2007

  • Vote for an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
    • Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
    • When voting For or Against, please change the score number accordingly—this saves a lot of time later.
    • IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
    • Nonsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button (Button sig) above the edit box.
    • When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the article using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
  • Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
  • Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
  • Voters: don't be dicks and do be constructive with criticism. Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
  • Articles from all namespaces (including UnNews, HowTo, UnBooks, etc.) are eligible for VFH. Votes against articles based on namespace prejudice will be discarded.
  • If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
THIS IS A VOTE, NOT A DISCUSSION. If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it HERE.
Violators of this policy will be granted 72 virgins by Allah.



Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must spend at least one week on Pee Review OR receive one critique via Pee Review before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time and require no review (though it is still recommended).

VFH IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.

NEW VOTE SYSTEM TRYOUT: We're trying out a new way to vote. See template:Vote for instructions, and leave comments at Forum:Template:Vote.


The Hell Outta Here

Vote: The Hell Outta Here

Score: -1

Nomination: Andorin Kato
For Votes: 1
  1. Self-nom and for. Finally, the in-joke from Zork brought to article form. --Andorin Kato 04:55, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 2
  1. No thanks. . It's a one-line chuckler crammed into a (reasonably well written, if not particularly funny) full length article. --El Zoof 07:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. No Don't know what Zork is and didn't understand the article. The Oblong Lobster 11:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Drill sergeant

Vote: Drill sergeant

Score: -1 FUCKING VOTERS!

Nomination: UNKNOWNFILE
For Votes: 6
  1. nom & for. excellent example of self-reference. --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 15:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Weak for on account of the fact that all caps fits. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome)
  3. --~ Tophatsig 20:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. For and comment to the againsters: are you crazy? THIS ARTICLE IS SUPPOSED TO BE YELLING AT YOUR FACE, SCUMMAGGOTS! -- herr doktor needsAcell Rocket [scream!] 20:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. For--Dr. Fenwick 02:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 7
  1. Naaah. --L 16:12, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Against The whole thing is CAPS, how can I see? Vincent Pun 16:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Against Don't get me wrong but it being in all caps makes it harder to read, and thereby, takes away from its humour. But if the article isn't in all caps, it doesn't make sense and not funny at all. It is quite the paradox. --Dexter111344 17:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. No. Having this on the front page is a long shot away from having even Ct. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 18:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. Against. I was thinking about voting for it, but You TEH GEY gave me a rash. Sorry. ~Jewriken.GIF 21:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. Against - I love the idea (like most of So So's articles), but the execution isn't great. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. Against. Not hard to read, but not particularly funny. Maybe with audio? I dunno. --El Zoof 07:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Abs. Funny, but wears thin early. I think it could be 20x funnier if a different approach was taken. --THINKER 20:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Abstain. I REALLY want to vote for this since the execution is the right way to do it. However, it's just too full-force the entire time.--Mr.Vib 13:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

UnNews:NASA boldly goes where no kiddy ride has gone before

Vote: UnNews:NASA boldly goes where no kiddy ride has gone before

Score: 9 scientifically jaded Uncyclopedians

Nomination: THINKER 21:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 9
  1. Nom+Dig I found this article hilarious before doing a minor touch-up and adding the right pic and caption. I found it even funnier with the shaking space shuttle, and after rereading, yes. Its hilarious and even funnier. Simultaneously. --THINKER 21:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. For. Also, part of my soul just died. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 23:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. For. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 12:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. Definately This is very good.. The Oblong Lobster 16:40, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. Up, up, and awaaaaay! ... Okay that was lame. For. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. for --THE 00:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. For –—Hv (talk) 30/05 13:20
  8. Beautiful-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. For. Space, the first budget cut. These are the sitting around and rustings of the space shuttle fleet... --El Zoof 07:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0

No against votes

Pathological liar

Vote: Pathological liar

Score: 13 Flying Japanese Sand Tigers

Nomination: Mr.Vib
For Votes: 15
  1. Self-Nom and For. Pee Reviewed and reviewed again after a complete rewrite. I know that it's difficult to read, but that's the only way I found to make it work. --Mr.Vib 11:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. For. I really like the tone and flow. The plot devices are terrific and I really dig the multilayered, multidimensional themes and story lines thought out the article. Greetings from a fellow Pathological liar.-- Vosnul 14:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Against ForThis is complete and utter tripe It's funny. I liked it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. Dig there are some improvements that could be made to help readability, but its pretty damn funny regardless. --THINKER 18:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. 4 Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. Even if I end up Darwining my own article, For Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 19:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. For --THE 21:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. For I also have an idea for a reskin based around this. --General Insineratehymn 21:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. For --GeorgeRI.jpg» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) SpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerIcons-flag-gb 30px-Coatsmxa.pngSpacerSpacerSpacerIcons-flag-usSpacerSpacerSpacer 05:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  10. For - Damn funny (I'm a pathological liar...) ;) Spawn Man 05:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  11. For. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 12:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  12. For. --User:TheHop 1 2/sig 9:50, 29 May, 2007 (UTC)
  13. For I can feel the sun! The Oblong Lobster 16:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  14. Why Not? Weasel Weasel 3689Sucrose b Colombia icon 23:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  15. For Karma-AH 07:25, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 2
  1. The humour is unsubtle at best and all the crossing out is annoying. --Kelpan 15:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Against. I've read it three times now and...I like the idea, but the execution makes blood come out of my ears (which is a nice change, admittedly, but still). Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Just created a reskin related to this article, located here. Add or improve to it if needed. --General Insineratehymn 23:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Hiroshima

Vote: Hiroshima

Score: -2 fun tourist traps utterly decimated by a stream of black lava raining down from the blood-red heavens themselves

Nomination: Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 18:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 4
  1. Nom + For. One of my favorite articles by Rei, and on the entire site. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 18:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Weak for. It's about one section short of being truly nifty, though. --L 05:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Weak For as per L. ~Jewriken.GIF 22:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. For And thanks for the nom.  :) -- Rei 05:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 6
  1. Pope with eyebeams equals no. -- herr doktor needsAcell Rocket [scream!] 17:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Against Sorry, but half-assed hyperbole that reads too much like fact does not a VFH-worthy article make. Don't get me wrong, it's aight, but if there were more jest and less fact in there, it would be better.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Against. I second what Ljlego said. Also, it seems more like pure anger than comic anger in the writing. The pictures display that idea well, but the text seems somewhat sad. It's almost depressing.--Mr.Vib 19:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. Against --Dr. Fenwick 22:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. "Smite-this-nomination-down-oh-mighty-lord-of-yore!" Oppose - Sorry, but my vote will have to be an ahem-no. It starts off really well, but by the end it becomes way too repetitive (IE, Booring fact paragraph, then waay too angry smiting paragraph etc etc). Maybe lumping all the anger together would make it more enjoyable, but whatever the case, it's too repetitive & factual right now. The images portray the feeling a bit better than the article ATM. Cheers, Spawn Man 07:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. Against, everyone knows that Nagasaki is the funny one. This has potential that is, as yet, unused. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:38, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • I de-Pope'd it, if that would change any votes (even though I thought the caption for the pope would suffice to have redeemed it for its cliche-ness... apparently I was wrong). --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 18:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Abs. - I know what its doing, I like what its doing, but I don't think its being done to the proper extent. There are elements that need alteration. I dig it though, so I won't vote against it. --THINKER 18:50, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Lost Vikings

Vote: Lost Vikings

Score: 12 Norse sports newscasters

Nomination: <<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 13
  1. Well, Kalir nommed one of mine, so now I've found one of his that I liked that I thought was worth a for.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. That good, eh? Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 04:43, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. For: As someone who liked the original game, the sportsdesk picture really sells it, and the article itself delivers it. I, for one, welcome our Norse overlords. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 08:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. For, dudes. -- Hindleyite Converse 10:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. For. --Emmzee 15:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. yes LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 19:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. For Kind of random but very funny nonetheless--Dr. Fenwick 00:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. For the vikings. -- herr doktor needsAcell Rocket [scream!] 17:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. Weak for The picture put me over the edge.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  10. By Thor! -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 21:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  11. Strong For, those pictures are awesome. We should totally feature them or something. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  12. For. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 16:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  13. For! I deserve extra credit for fixing ZB's spelling errors. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 01:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 1
  1. against Great Video Game: Shitty Article --Steve Johnsenson 05:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  1. Against I like the concept, but there are changes that need to be made. With such a random connection (video games Vikings turned newscasters), a better segue is needed. I'd help, as Kalir suggested, but I don't know anything about the game. Sorry bro. --THINKER 18:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Keep in mind, I've yet to get an article to featured status, so if you could provide good advice, you can get a hippie when you bring the article back down to earth. Also, I'll be thankful. And everyone loves a happy Kalir. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 05:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

The Steve Johnsenson against wave (and its numerous references to feces) leads me to believe that little constructive input will be offered. --THINKER 05:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Ah. Well, the request still stands, but thanks. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 05:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I have concluded that the conclusion needs to be more effectively concluded, otherwise voters will conclude that an Against vote is needed to conclude this VFH section. So, yeah, I beefed up the end. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 19:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

My issue is more with the leap from being vikings, to being vikings at the super bowl, to being viking behind a newscasters desk. The intro is like 4 sentences; for people who don't know whats up, well... they wont know whats up now will they? --THINKER 20:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Ah. I do that sometimes... If you want, you can take a crack at fixing it. It is a wiki after all. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 22:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
I'd help, as Kalir suggested, but I don't know anything about the game. Sorry bro. I'm not equipped for such a task. --THINKER 01:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Letter to the Isle

Vote: Letter to the Isle

Score: 15 Letters to the isle

Nomination: Emmzee 03:15, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 16
  1. N+F. --Emmzee 03:15, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. For --Hrodulf 03:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. For: Pure genius if you ask me. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 03:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. Brilliant-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. It's got my vote. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. to be honest, articles that have had little contributions don't deserve a place here, but there's an odd exception, so for --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 04:02, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. For Rogpyvbc 05:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. For InfiniteMonkey
  9. Dig glorious. --THINKER 17:58, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  10. lawl LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 19:30, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  11. For--Sirrah Shandon 23:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  12. Fore! Yes! A hole in one! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 14:44, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  13. Ya! Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:05, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  14. For--Dr. Fenwick 00:36, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  15. For -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  18:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  16. FOR Utterly brilliant attack on Britain and its Britishness. Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) Icons-flag-ie-Icons-flag-us KUN SEXY WH
Against Votes: 1
  1. Couldn't recommend. Reminds one of fecal pain --Steve Johnsenson 05:01, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Gee thanks. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:07, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  1. Marginal Against. I like the idea because I could see some schmuck here doing this. This is a type of article that has needed to be on here for a while, ESPECIALLY with the heavy mix of American and British users. However, I didn't think the humor (since it's American) was consistent. The references to the Queen/Paris Hilton comparison and the dentist picture were funny, but the terms references became old after a few paragraphs. I also wish there had been more jokes along the lines of the "old people slipping in piss" one.--Mr.Vib 19:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Reality check

Vote: Reality check

Score: 7 Times being gently tapped on the shoulder by the universe

Nomination: ~Jewriken.GIF 21:35, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 7
  1. The Hittites made OEJ write that one. Aye. ~Jewriken.GIF 21:35, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. For Rogpyvbc 23:19, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Dig Keep your tusks away from the goods, mastodon.. --THINKER 03:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. For Finally I know what's happening when I wake up with a giant dead mackeral on my head. I guess I should apologize to my brother . . . -Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. -L 05:44, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. For--Dr. Fenwick 22:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. For. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 12:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0

No against votes

Comments
  • Sorry, maybe this is due lack of Ritalin but it made me lose attention after I bumped into the first anachronism (Windows). -- herr doktor needsAcell Rocket [scream!] 20:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

The Meeting: A Play in One Act

Vote: The Meeting: A Play in One Act

Score: 11 painted-on Powerpoint slides

Nomination: Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 09:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 13
  1. Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 09:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. For. This generation's Waiting for Godot? Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 13:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Could've sworn Mandaliet wrote this one from the corporate drone's parts... Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 15:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. DIG I thought the same thing as ENeGMA. Brilliant! :) --THINKER 18:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. YEs I really like this kind of thing. The Oblong Lobster 23:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. --AtomDsig.png 20:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. Yes-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. Brilliant -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. ForInfiniteMonkey
  10. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 22:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  11. For Suicide looms... lol 134.226.1.229 19:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  12. For. Nothing like corporate asses dying inside...or something like that. --Mr.Vib 18:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  13. For Heeheehee... I am laughing... --The Acceptable Thinking cap small Cainad Sacred Chao (Fnord) 07:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 2
  1. Not bad, I chuckled at parts but definitely not featured article material. ennui2778 dif
  2. Naaah--Sir Shandon 06:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Sucks Ass --Steve Johnsenson 04:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

My Chemical Romance

Vote: My Chemical Romance

Score: 15 emos who didn't get the joke

Nomination: herr doktor needsAcell Rocket [scream!]
For Votes: 20
  1. Nominating and for. Nice rewrite by Nakedman. Notice that this article is not random at all: it's perfectly coherent with its title and draws its humor for what it doesn't deliver. Ignoring the band is a very ironic comment on its real relevance. -- herr doktor needsAcell Rocket [scream!] 19:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. For Amen-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. For Very cute. Rogpyvbc 22:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. For So sweet, so tender, Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. Yeah, boy but is it going to become a tradition to take doomed articles and rewrite them with chemistry topics? Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 00:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. For - never in a million years did I think I would vote for an emo band article. This isn't an emo band article, though, so I'll still stand by that. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. For Megamanfanx7 13:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. Ooooooo...... that is funny. For. --Andorin Kato 05:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  20:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  10. For. Very clever. –—Hv (talk) 24/05 20:44
  11. For - What a totally unbiased and non self-centered vote! --Nakedman 12:38, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  12. Forgasm. --Emmzee 13:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  13. For. Just when I had given up on Uncyc, it stopped sucking and started producing stuff like this again. InfiniteMonkey
  14. For.Brilliant, even if there is really only one joke.--Imber 18:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  15. for Id like to see more of this. LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 22:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  16. Holy Freaking Crap Mega-Strong For With Chocolate!!! That was awesome! (Although it does make me wonder if the whole "chemistry article" thing is becoming a fad.) </votewhoring> --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 17:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  17. For. Brilliant!! Takes a great idea and runs with it. Brianrein 19:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  18. For Definitely front page-worthy Coxxx
  19. brilliance --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 13:40, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  20. Yes Couldn't be bothered to read it before. Glad I made the effort. The Oblong Lobster 16:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 5
  1. Nah not feelin' this one. Sorry doc. --THINKER 18:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. No. I get the reference to the band, but it still lacks something with the night of passion. I was expecting something more with the "corosive acid" angle.--Mr.Vib 19:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Against I don't get the article. Really, I don't. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Guymandude (talk • contribs)

strong against Not even a glimpse of humor --Steve Johnsenson 05:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  1. Hell No --Dexter111344 02:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Weak against: Great idea, but could be expanded. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 02:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Abstain. I was going to vote Against. Then I read the talk page & thought the talk page was more funny than the article. Then I read the article again. Maybe I'll vote For if it gets another appropriate picture or something to grab the reader a bit better.--Sir Shandon 10:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Yeah, that image improved it by, like, a thousand times. --Nakedman 12:38, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
I added a new, new image. InfiniteMonkey
  • Abstain. I expected loads of reverences to Die Chymische Hochzeit Des Christiani Rosenkreutz. Now that would have made some some serious Hardcore Smartassery.--Vosnul 20:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Baby Fu

Vote: Baby Fu

Score: 9 Dragon Dung masters

Nomination: 02:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 9
  1. Brad made me do it. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 02:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. I did not. Also, for.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 02:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. You did too. Probably. Maybe. I wasn't there. Also, for. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. Hi YA! I vote for articre now.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. Dig --THINKER 01:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. Hai. --Emmzee 13:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. For...All right, Brad: after a day or two of letting this percolate in voting, I've concluded this is better than most.--Sir Shandon 10:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. For- Not sure why I like this show but I do so yeah....--Dr. Fenwick 22:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. For. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 12:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0
  1. no, no, no! where is the humor? --Steve Johnsenson 05:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

UnNews:Boy found at home, alone

Vote: UnNews:Boy found at home, alone

Score: 11 dead children

Nomination: Uncle J
For Votes: 12
  1. nom and for : This is one of the funniest articles I've ever read --Uncle J 01:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. For. Maybe one day I'll watch the movie. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. For, because I like dead baby jokes. Or really anything involving baby jokes. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 14:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. For. --Emmzee 22:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. --L 03:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. Dig in the words of the wise Rafiki; "change, is good." Much better updated. --THINKER 11:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. Change of heart (again). Change at the end makes it more complete. I like it. --Mr.Vib 12:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. Mmmmm...okay--THE 13:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  10. Sure Me likely. --Dexter111344 02:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  11. For--Dr. Fenwick 02:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  12. For--Will Tomlinson
Against Votes: 1
  1. strong against Fine if you enjoy feces consumption --Steve Johnsenson 05:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:31, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  1. Iffy Against While it's funny, it's mainly a quote and lacks any sort of mock tone that would put it over the top for me. Call me crazy. Sorry.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Against per Mr. Vib --THINKER 01:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Okay, okay, I fleshed out the text and dropped the "this reporter" bit. I didn't wanna, but I am bowing to peer pressure for the greater good of Uncyclopedia. Jeez, the things I do for this website... Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Anime

Vote: Anime

Score: 13 animo acids

Nomination: Love this re-write--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 22:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 18
  1. Nom+for. Oh comon, even you have to admit this take on anime led to some great chemsisty.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 22:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. For Very nice <insert obligatory Borat joke here>-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Strong For, even though it's just begging to be IP raped. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 01:55, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. Self-for. I've been working on this on and off for almost two months now, and I'm flattered to see that it was nominated so quickly! --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 04:06, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. For. All praises to anime, although I got the feeling the idea was somehow stolen from me... --The Dit 07:35, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. --AtomDsig.png 20:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. For. Very clever. --Andorin Kato 20:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. For Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. For I've seen the article before, and trust me, this is a vast improvement. I think it should get a full protect after (if) is gets to the front page though. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 15:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  10. Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 15:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  11. For--Dr. Fenwick 20:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  12. For cool. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 23:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  13. Very for, especially with the choice of chemical formula. --Imber 18:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  14. Very Strong For. This is an amazing improvement over the original article. Finally, one that doesn't say anime fans are [insert insult here]. That in itself deserves a feature, if even just to keep it that way. I really do like the chemistry, though, very original! -- TheSlyFox 00:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  15. For. Nice work chaps. His Grace, the Duke 11:37, May 24 2007 (BST)
  16. every time this article has come back from being nuked it has sucked. this is an exception, in fact, it is very good, so for --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 03:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  17. Yes sir, thank you sir. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  18. Very For: Funny, irreverent, goes in a direction you don't expect it to, and isn't either "omg anime r00lz u all" or "omg anime sux0rz u suk". The sort of thing you could confuse with a "real" article for a few minutes. Excellent indeed. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 00:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 5
  1. Excrement-I tasted bile in the back of my throat --Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  1. Against --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 02:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. -~Jewriken.GIF 12:54, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Against per UF in the Pee Review: Excellent concept, could be funnier (still). --THINKER 18:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. Halfhearted Against. Not good, but not terrible. Just boring. --Emmzee 01:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. Against Sorry, this is well written but I just don't get the overall point. The Oblong Lobster 14:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • @Jedravent: Is that supposed to be ironic, or is it a mistake? --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • I agree with the person above that this article definitely needs a full protect. -- TheSlyFox 00:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Needs a full protect. Maybe even if it doesn't make it to the front page. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 00:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Sperm: A Chronicle moved to Sperm

Vote: Sperm: A Chronicle

Score: 14.5 blobs of Sponk

Nomination: Olipro
For Votes: 15.5
  1. Nom & For - Made me laugh, definitely a quality article... not to mention the highly unique writing style -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Yes, please. --General Insineratehymn 02:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. For - Blah blah blah - It's gneomI 02:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. --L 07:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. Definitely worth it! Very funny. --JewBoy 14:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. For. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 15:06, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. For- Ihave to admit I was afraid I wans't going to like it, but who can dislike quality sperm jokes?--Gaberou 20:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. Very nice --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 15:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. Yes - Made me spunk! The Oblong Lobster 17:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  10. Why didn't i vote for on this before? I mean i read it, then forgot to vote. --Emmzee 23:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  11. Fro --THE 20:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  12. For -- 131.170.90.2 01:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  13. For. Remembers me of the last chapter of "Everything you blahblah about sex blahblah afraid to ask". -- herr doktor needsAcell Rocket [scream!] 20:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  14. A spunky attempt at a subject matter that could be a real handful. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 22:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  15. ForBraydie 21:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  16. Yep. Funny stuff. Slightly disturbing with the pictures, but funny.--Mr.Vib 13:22, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 1
  1. Snore--Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  1. Sorry But this one doesn't do it for me.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • I decided to be italic, and transformed the Sperm article into this. --L 07:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Saint Frankenstein's Day

Vote: Saint Frankenstein's Day

Score: 14 humorous brain-shaped hats

Nomination: Cap'n Ben
For Votes: 14
  1. Self nom & For A brilliant idea by El Zoof, expanded and rewritten by yrs. truly --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:43, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Approved. -- herr doktor needsAcell Rocket [scream!] 02:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. For. Well, what the hell did you expect? I merely laid the corpse out on the slab, it was Cap'n Ben who attached the electrodes and sent it lumbering towards the Village People. --El Zoof 05:44, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. For It should be featured without a doubt. Kip the Dip 12:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. Oh my god, this is brilliant. For. --Emmzee 13:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. Dig very good stuff --THINKER 18:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. EAT THAT! - I would say yes. The Oblong Lobster 22:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. For. Devilishly brilliant. Near-perfect comedy. YouFang 01:05, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. For. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 13:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  10. For The White House Brain Roll sealed the deal. Hugs! Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 02:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  11. For. ~Jewriken.GIF 13:05, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  12. Feb 14. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 18:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  13. For Don alun 11:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  14. For Took me too long to get to this baby.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0
  1. not --Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  1. I was going to nominate it myself around Valentine's Day, but if y'all think it's ready now, okay. Kip the Dip 12:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Would be perfect for Valentine's Day. But that's a while off.The Oblong Lobster 22:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
I had originally intended it to be released before Valentine's Day in the hope that it got picked up as front-page material for that day... but then I got stuck and ran away and hid from the article. Thanks once again to Cap'n Ben for rescuing it. --El Zoof 21:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

UnBooks:The Sun

Vote: UnBooks:The Sun

Score: 11 Cro-Magnon poets

Nomination: He's a radical rat! (Talk page!/Contribs) 08:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 14
  1. For. Quasi that made me laugh. --He's a radical rat! (Talk page!/Contribs)
  2. Onka-Bonka! -- herr doktor needsAcell Rocket [scream!] 16:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Article good for brain. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:45, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. Still for, although most of it is over my head. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. Weak for. It's hilarious, I laughed out loud at "Ug no able record CSI: Miami," but it's a little too short... but funny enough to compensate. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 03:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. --L 10:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. Self-for. --Emmzee 00:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. Dig but Ug digress --THINKER 20:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  10. Fug, even though I voted Agug last time --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 01:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  11. Featured article good. --General Insineratehymn 02:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  12. Abstinence Lifted Good luck.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:54, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  13. For --GeorgeRI.jpg» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) SpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerIcons-flag-gb 30px-Coatsmxa.pngSpacerSpacerSpacerIcons-flag-usSpacerSpacerSpacer 20:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  14. For. goshzillacorrespondence 02:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 3
  1. crap--Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  1. Against Lovely article, but I think MO's article did the caveman thing better. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:23, 14 May 2007
  2. nope, nope, nope. not funny, semi-duplicate article and vote-whoring on irc is a great way to seal your fate. --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 03:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. *sigh* I'm sorry. Against. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Hey, it's just my rationale for abstinence. Not attempting to convince anyone one way or the other. And plus, why knowingly get added to something with worst in the title.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Just vote already. Gol-dang kids with your highfalootin' words like "rationale" and "or". Pah! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Alright, my will is less firm than I originally made it out to be. Sue me.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Fortune Cookie

Vote: Fortune Cookie

Score: 11.5 Ancient Chinese Secrets

Nomination: LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 04:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 13.5
  1. Self Nom + For because I like this article of mine. LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 04:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Dig ..and to think it was on VFD not to long ago.. Great overhaul! --THINKER 04:32, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. For It's better to vote for now than for later, in bed.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. For I've been watching this article since way before the vfd, it's completely different now and I think it's finally pretty good.  –  FuhQ.gifFuhQ  ZDsig.gifZDsig Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 18:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. For Splendid.--Dr. Fenwick 19:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. For. Revenge vote. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 19:48, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. For. -- herr doktor needsAcell Rocket [scream!] 16:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. For, since the damn pic has been fixed --Sir Shandon 15:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. a-FOR-ism. The pic is fantastic. Oh, and the writing's good too. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 22:08, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  10. For, a charming article. A LOL, indeed. --63.24.61.167 22:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  11. For. --Emmzee 13:17, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  12. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  13. For --User:Pwner Ganondorf 17:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  14. Confucious say:This article will be featured. Lucky letters are:S, T, F, U. Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines
Against Votes: 2
  1. shit sandwich --Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  1. Against...if that image is fixed I might change my vote.--Sir Shandon 17:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Note: I fixed the odd edges of the fortune cookie  –  FuhQ.gifFuhQ  ZDsig.gifZDsig Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 18:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
The image is strangely assembled from four parts, however, when you press refresh theres a new fortune! its the only good part of the old article. cept maybe "how to be hysterical." LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 22:40, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  1. Not funny. --So So 06:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Against. Unsuccessfully straddles the line between quasi-historical and somethingelse. It might work better to pick one and run with it. Run! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • I'm gonna think on my vote for a while. I've been pretty ruthless tonight thus far, and the turn around in this article from its stint on VFD (which can't have been much more than a week ago) is enormous, but sadly it still fails to hit that secret spot for me. The funny spot, not the other one...pervert! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 08:30, 13 May 2007
Not this version of it no. Extensive work has been done to it since it was on VFD. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:32, 14 May 2007
  • Aw is it like that? Didn't do too bad, and the comparison is pretty steep.. The cookie is cool? Who can say...
    But, Leatherbound hasn't answered my call for Ups or downs, so whatev... :) --THINKER 09:50, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Good luck Leatherboundbooks. It's pretty darn near impossible to get Ceridwyn's vote, apparently.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Not at all. I've voted for plenty of good quality articles. Just the recent batch don't quite hit the mark for me. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:17, 13 May 2007
  • Well, considering I put it up for VFD because it was under the wrong name and was a completely different and terrible article, think of them as seperate entities. (Do it for the random fortune fortune cookie, if only the random fortune fortune cookie) LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 13:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)


Previously Featured

Global Cooling

Vote: Global Cooling

Score: 16 Land-locked ports

Nomination: Rogpyvbc 22:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 19

Featuredrc (t) 04:55, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

  1. Self-nom and for. Good pee review, my first attempt at being featured. Rogpyvbc 22:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Quality article. Good work on the tense change. --Kelpan 22:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. For Quality - This deserves featuring. Matt lobster 23:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:26, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. For Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. Dig absolutely --THINKER 05:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. Beautiful satire of a subject all too often made into crap.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. For, because it eases my conscience over all those hours spent logging and then burning stuff just for the hell of it. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  18:24, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. For I like the irony. Ethereal 04:55, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
  10. For. Funny stuff. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 17:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
  11. For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 04:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  12. For - It's gneomI 12:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  13. Genius. --Emmzee 13:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  14. For - [Insert vote whore here] --Starnestommy (TalkContribsFFSWP) 01:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  15. for in school today, some idiots use the day after tomorrow as a reference for their presentation on global warming. what the fuck? the experience makes this all too funny in the saddest of ways. LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 02:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  16. For. But gets a bit weak near the end. goshzillacorrespondence 19:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  17. For We all must do our part Megamanfanx7 13:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  18. For --GeorgeRI.jpg» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) SpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerIcons-flag-gb 30px-Coatsmxa.pngSpacerSpacerSpacerIcons-flag-usSpacerSpacerSpacer 21:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  19. For. This is probably the only article on UnC about "future events" which is actually funny and not about Chuck Norris becoming a cyborg president in 3813 AD. --Nakedman 19:29, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 3
  1. It's not worthy! It's not worthy! --Steve Johnsenson 05:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:41, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  1. Against Sorry, its a decent article, but not feature worthy imo. Just didn't hit that spot... ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 06:19, 13 May 2007
  2. Against Very well written, but it lacks anything really humorous. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Against I liked it, but I don't think it is feature-worthy. --Dexter111344 02:07, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Dantoller has voted against this because I nominated an article of his for deletion. I don't think his vote should count.Rogpyvbc 18:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

dantoller

  • Thanks for changing your vote, Dantoller. But I don't think I can accept a for vote for the wrong reasons either, so I've removed your vote altogether. Rogpyvbc 17:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Archives

Recently Archived Votes:

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10
11 - 12 - 13

Awards, Decorations and Honours
Awards2 Awards Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Admin Rank · Ninjastars
Ranks &
Honours
Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the moment
Potatochopper of the Month

Foolitzer Prize
Writer of the Year · Uncyclopedian of the Year · RadicalX of the Year
RYA · User Space Affiliations · Past Winners


Limelight VFH · VFP · Best of · Top Ten: 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · Uncyclopedia:Top 10 Articles of 2013 · Hall of Shame
Prix citron Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year · Sandwich of the Month · FFS
Events citron Poo Lit Suprise · Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball · The Article Whisperer
Happy Monkey Competition · Other competitions

Personal tools
In other languages
projects