Score: -3 pieces of crap (literally)

No for votes

1. Nom & Against - Because it really needs a {{QFH}} on it. --AAA! (AAAA) 03:17, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Against: You nom this and say against. Really funny...Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 03:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Against Wtf is this all about? --THINKER 03:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: -5 AFGNCAAP-Fearing Mario Brothers

No for votes

1. Meh.-- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Against. Que "loosing"? The rest is okay, if a bit listy. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:21, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Nope. Too messy to my taste. Sorry. ~ 22:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Against Curse you MO, I was just about to point that out too. Spelling error in title = Against. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 10:25, 28 May 2007
5. No. The idea... well... what is the idea? Is it that game bosses dance a lot? Is it that hint guides suck? That bosses at work should be defeated by shooting them? It's... it's just not that good, sorry. --El Zoof 02:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Only the dead live without fear... huh? --THINKER 03:22, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 2 scientifically jaded Uncyclopedians

1. Nom+Dig I found this article hilarious before doing a minor touch-up and adding the right pic and caption. I found it even funnier with the shaking space shuttle, and after rereading, yes. Its hilarious and even funnier. Simultaneously. --THINKER 21:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For. Also, part of my soul just died. Ж Cake-eating Cave Monkey _{or was it a giant monster or a robot?} 23:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 8 Flying Japanese Sand Tigers

1. Self-Nom and For. Pee Reviewed and reviewed again after a complete rewrite. I know that it's difficult to read, but that's the only way I found to make it work. --Mr.Vib 11:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For. I really like the tone and flow. The plot devices are terrific and I really dig the multilayered, multidimensional themes and story lines thought out the article. Greetings from a fellow Pathological liar.-- Vosnul 14:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Against ForThis is complete and utter tripe It's funny. I liked it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Dig there are some improvements that could be made to help readability, but its pretty damn funny regardless. --THINKER 18:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
5. 4 Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Even if I end up Darwining my own article, For Ж Cake-eating Cave Monkey _{or was it a giant monster or a robot?} 19:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For --THE 21:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For I also have an idea for a reskin based around this. --General Insineratehymn 21:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

• Just created a reskin related to this article, located here. Add or improve to it if needed. --General Insineratehymn 23:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: -1 fun tourist traps utterly decimated by a stream of black lava raining down from the blood-red heavens themselves

1. Nom + For. One of my favorite articles by Rei, and on the entire site. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Weak for. It's about one section short of being truly nifty, though. --L 05:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Weak For as per L. ~ 22:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Pope with eyebeams equals no. -- herr doktor needsAgear  [scream!] 17:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Against Sorry, but half-assed hyperbole that reads too much like fact does not a VFH-worthy article make. Don't get me wrong, it's aight, but if there were more jest and less fact in there, it would be better.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Against. I second what Ljlego said. Also, it seems more like pure anger than comic anger in the writing. The pictures display that idea well, but the text seems somewhat sad. It's almost depressing.--Mr.Vib 19:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Against --Dr. Fenwick 22:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

• I de-Pope'd it, if that would change any votes (even though I thought the caption for the pope would suffice to have redeemed it for its cliche-ness... apparently I was wrong). -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Abs. - I know what its doing, I like what its doing, but I don't think its being done to the proper extent. There are elements that need alteration. I dig it though, so I won't vote against it. --THINKER 18:50, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 9 Norse sports newscasters

1. Well, Kalir nommed one of mine, so now I've found one of his that I liked that I thought was worth a for.--<<>> 04:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
2. That good, eh? Ж Cake-eating Cave Monkey _{or was it a giant monster or a robot?} 04:43, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For: As someone who liked the original game, the sportsdesk picture really sells it, and the article itself delivers it. I, for one, welcome our Norse overlords. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 08:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For, dudes. -- Hindleyite Converse 10:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For. --Emmzee 15:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
6. yes Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 19:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For Kind of random but very funny nonetheless--Dr. Fenwick 00:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For the vikings. -- herr doktor needsAgear  [scream!] 17:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
9. Weak for The picture put me over the edge.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
10. By Thor! -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 21:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

1. against Great Video Game: Shitty Article --Steve Johnsenson 05:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against I like the concept, but there are changes that need to be made. With such a random connection (video games Vikings turned newscasters), a better segue is needed. I'd help, as Kalir suggested, but I don't know anything about the game. Sorry bro. --THINKER 18:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Keep in mind, I've yet to get an article to featured status, so if you could provide good advice, you can get a hippie when you bring the article back down to earth. Also, I'll be thankful. And everyone loves a happy Kalir. Ж Cake-eating Cave Monkey _{or was it a giant monster or a robot?} 05:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

The Steve Johnsenson against wave (and its numerous references to feces) leads me to believe that little constructive input will be offered. --THINKER 05:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Ah. Well, the request still stands, but thanks. Ж Cake-eating Cave Monkey _{or was it a giant monster or a robot?} 05:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I have concluded that the conclusion needs to be more effectively concluded, otherwise voters will conclude that an Against vote is needed to conclude this VFH section. So, yeah, I beefed up the end. Ж Cake-eating Cave Monkey _{or was it a giant monster or a robot?} 19:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

My issue is more with the leap from being vikings, to being vikings at the super bowl, to being viking behind a newscasters desk. The intro is like 4 sentences; for people who don't know whats up, well... they wont know whats up now will they? --THINKER 20:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Ah. I do that sometimes... If you want, you can take a crack at fixing it. It is a wiki after all. Ж Cake-eating Cave Monkey _{or was it a giant monster or a robot?} 22:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

I'd help, as Kalir suggested, but I don't know anything about the game. Sorry bro. I'm not equipped for such a task. --THINKER 01:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 12 Letters to the isle

1. N+F. --Emmzee 03:15, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For --Hrodulf 03:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For: Pure genius if you ask me. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 03:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Brilliant-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
5. It's got my vote. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
6. to be honest, articles that have had little contributions don't deserve a place here, but there's an odd exception, so for --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:02, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For Rogpyvbc 05:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For InfiniteMonkey
9. Dig glorious. --THINKER 17:58, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
10. lawl Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 19:30, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For--Sirrah Shandon 23:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
12. Fore! Yes! A hole in one! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 14:44, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
13. Ya! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:05, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Couldn't recommend. Reminds one of fecal pain --Steve Johnsenson 05:01, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Gee thanks. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 05:07, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Marginal Against. I like the idea because I could see some schmuck here doing this. This is a type of article that has needed to be on here for a while, ESPECIALLY with the heavy mix of American and British users. However, I didn't think the humor (since it's American) was consistent. The references to the Queen/Paris Hilton comparison and the dentist picture were funny, but the terms references became old after a few paragraphs. I also wish there had been more jokes along the lines of the "old people slipping in piss" one.--Mr.Vib 19:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 6 Times being gently tapped on the shoulder by the universe

1. The Hittites made OEJ write that one. Aye. ~ 21:35, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For Rogpyvbc 23:19, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Dig Keep your tusks away from the goods, mastodon.. --THINKER 03:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For Finally I know what's happening when I wake up with a giant dead mackeral on my head. I guess I should apologize to my brother . . . -Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
5. -L 05:44, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
6. For--Dr. Fenwick 22:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

• Sorry, maybe this is due lack of Ritalin but it made me lose attention after I bumped into the first anachronism (Windows). -- herr doktor needsAgear  [scream!] 20:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 9 painted-on Powerpoint slides

1. Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 09:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For. This generation's Waiting for Godot? Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 13:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Could've sworn Mandaliet wrote this one from the corporate drone's parts... Ж Cake-eating Cave Monkey _{or was it a giant monster or a robot?} 15:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
4. DIG I thought the same thing as ENeGMA. Brilliant! :) --THINKER 18:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
5. YEs I really like this kind of thing. The Oblong Lobster 23:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
6. -- 20:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Yes-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Brilliant -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
9. ForInfiniteMonkey
10. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For Suicide looms... lol 134.226.1.229 19:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Not bad, I chuckled at parts but definitely not featured article material. ennui2778 dif
2. Naaah--Sir Shandon 06:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Sucks Ass --Steve Johnsenson 04:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 17 music cues

1. Nom and For I haven't laughed this hard at an article in a long time. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 02:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For more social satire. Cue insidious music...Dun-dun dun! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:19, 24 May 2007 (UTC)\
3. For...solid writing, lots of appropriate pics, and Tuco. How can you go wrong with poor old Tuco.--Sir Shandon 10:06, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
4. DUN-DUN-DUN!!! Original idea, funny plot, and the pictures (not to mention the captions) top it off. This is great. --Mr.Vib 12:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For. --Emmzee 13:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Dig Not a riot but a well written article with enough sly wit for my vote. --THINKER 18:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Aye ~ 21:37, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
8. BRILLIANT This must surely be Modus's best ever. Although I say that anytime he writes just about anything. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
9. Definite FO hilarious --THE 23:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For - I was thinking of nomming the first image on VFP, but this will do instead. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
11. Good Stuff-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:53, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  17:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
13. Ermi Private Gert5 UGotM 17:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For. -- herr doktor needsAgear  [scream!] 19:59, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
15. For. -- Gryffon 02:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
16. For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
17. For Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 03:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
18. For Triple-Quadruple 17:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC) loved it!

1. against Ok if you enjoy same-sexed mutual masterbation --Steve Johnsenson 05:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against. That's just the way it is, things will never be the same -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

discussion moved to here, before RC gets mad and takes away our birthdays

• Abstain, I love this article with a passion, yet I also hate it with a passion for other reasons. Count this as a +/- 0 vote. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

  Hug? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:01, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

discussion moved beyond the stars

Score: 13 emos who didn't get the joke

1. Nominating and for. Nice rewrite by Nakedman. Notice that this article is not random at all: it's perfectly coherent with its title and draws its humor for what it doesn't deliver. Ignoring the band is a very ironic comment on its real relevance. -- herr doktor needsAgear  [scream!] 19:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For Amen-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For Very cute. Rogpyvbc 22:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For So sweet, so tender, Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Yeah, boy but is it going to become a tradition to take doomed articles and rewrite them with chemistry topics? Ж Cake-eating Cave Monkey _{or was it a giant monster or a robot?} 00:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
6. For - never in a million years did I think I would vote for an emo band article. This isn't an emo band article, though, so I'll still stand by that. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For Megamanfanx7 13:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Ooooooo...... that is funny. For. --Andorin Kato 05:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  20:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For. Very clever. –—Hv (talk) 24/05 20:44
11. For - What a totally unbiased and non self-centered vote! --Nakedman 12:38, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
12. Forgasm. --Emmzee 13:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For. Just when I had given up on Uncyc, it stopped sucking and started producing stuff like this again. InfiniteMonkey
14. For.Brilliant, even if there is really only one joke.--Imber 18:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
15. for Id like to see more of this. Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 22:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
16. Holy Freaking Crap Mega-Strong For With Chocolate!!! That was awesome! (Although it does make me wonder if the whole "chemistry article" thing is becoming a fad.) </votewhoring> --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 17:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
17. For. Brilliant!! Takes a great idea and runs with it. Brianrein 19:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Nah not feelin' this one. Sorry doc. --THINKER 18:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
2. No. I get the reference to the band, but it still lacks something with the night of passion. I was expecting something more with the "corosive acid" angle.--Mr.Vib 19:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Against I don't get the article. Really, I don't. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Guymandude (talk • contribs)

strong against Not even a glimpse of humor --Steve Johnsenson 05:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

• Abstain. I was going to vote Against. Then I read the talk page & thought the talk page was more funny than the article. Then I read the article again. Maybe I'll vote For if it gets another appropriate picture or something to grab the reader a bit better.--Sir Shandon 10:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

• I tried to lighten it up a bit with a new image. Check it out. -- herr doktor needsAgear  [scream!] 15:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

• Yeah, that image improved it by, like, a thousand times. --Nakedman 12:38, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

I added a new, new image. InfiniteMonkey

• Abstain. I expected loads of reverences to Die Chymische Hochzeit Des Christiani Rosenkreutz. Now that would have made some some serious Hardcore Smartassery.--Vosnul 20:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 8 Dragon Dung masters

1. Brad made me do it. Ж Cake-eating Cave Monkey _{or was it a giant monster or a robot?} 02:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2. I did not. Also, for.--<<>> 02:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
3. You did too. Probably. Maybe. I wasn't there. Also, for. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Hi YA! I vote for articre now.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Dig --THINKER 01:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Hai. --Emmzee 13:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For...All right, Brad: after a day or two of letting this percolate in voting, I've concluded this is better than most.--Sir Shandon 10:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For- Not sure why I like this show but I do so yeah....--Dr. Fenwick 22:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

1. no, no, no! where is the humor? --Steve Johnsenson 05:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 8 dead children

1. nom and for : This is one of the funniest articles I've ever read --Uncle J 01:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For. Maybe one day I'll watch the movie. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For, because I like dead baby jokes. Or really anything involving baby jokes. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 14:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For. --Emmzee 22:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
6. --L 03:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Dig in the words of the wise Rafiki; "change, is good." Much better updated. --THINKER 11:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Change of heart (again). Change at the end makes it more complete. I like it. --Mr.Vib 12:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
9. Mmmmm...okay--THE 13:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

1. strong against Fine if you enjoy feces consumption --Steve Johnsenson 05:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:31, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Iffy Against While it's funny, it's mainly a quote and lacks any sort of mock tone that would put it over the top for me. Call me crazy. Sorry.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Against per Mr. Vib --THINKER 01:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

• Okay, okay, I fleshed out the text and dropped the "this reporter" bit. I didn't wanna, but I am bowing to peer pressure for the greater good of Uncyclopedia. Jeez, the things I do for this website...back in my day it was "this reporter this" and "this reporter that". Kids these days! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 13 manly crystalline chaw-tobacco breaths

1. nom and for : This made me weep. It's sheer whatever it is, is whatever it is. Lovely touch, the audio as well. Sieg heil! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 23:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
2. sDig Here's hoping it isn't only me and zim laughing. :) --THINKER 23:38, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For --THE 23:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For Humor like this only can be found in God's country.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Diabeetus -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Change of Heart. I took a second read and imagined the cowboy narrating. Needless to say, it made the difference. --Mr.Vib 00:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For, though it's been bugging me that a lot of really good articles have been too short lately, like this very short article. If the trend continues I may start voting "against" stuff on the grounds of being too short. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 03:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Gotta check the audio later. --So So 06:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For...yeah, it's different. And funny.--Sir Shandon 10:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For. You know, I have a crush for Marlboro-ad deep USA. -- herr doktor needsAgear  [scream!] 20:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For- With a name like Folgers it ahs to be quality.--Dr. Fenwick 22:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For- I'm not sure I get it, but I sure like it. InfiniteMonkey
13. For Yay. noicely done mate -- Ker

1. against Do I really need to explain why? --Steve Johnsenson 05:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll, and by the way, yes you do, you fucking moron -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

• This is an ad parody that was made with recording in mind; I figured that the joke would wear thin with a 7 minute recording, ya know? And while I do agree that some small articles could use expansion to heighten their funny, I think that some shorties-but-goodies are warranted (like this one; if only because I entertain myself...and the opposite is a hard pill to swallow). :) --THINKER 01:00, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 13 animo acids

1. Nom+for. Oh comon, even you have to admit this take on anime led to some great chemsisty.--<<>> 22:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For Very nice <insert obligatory Borat joke here>-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Strong For, even though it's just begging to be IP raped. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:55, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Self-for. I've been working on this on and off for almost two months now, and I'm flattered to see that it was nominated so quickly! --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 04:06, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For. All praises to anime, although I got the feeling the idea was somehow stolen from me... --The Dit 07:35, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
6. -- 20:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For. Very clever. --Andorin Kato 20:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For I've seen the article before, and trust me, this is a vast improvement. I think it should get a full protect after (if) is gets to the front page though. Ж Cake-eating Cave Monkey _{or was it a giant monster or a robot?} 15:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
10. Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 15:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For--Dr. Fenwick 20:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For cool. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 23:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
13. Very for, especially with the choice of chemical formula. --Imber 18:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
14. Very Strong For. This is an amazing improvement over the original article. Finally, one that doesn't say anime fans are [insert insult here]. That in itself deserves a feature, if even just to keep it that way. I really do like the chemistry, though, very original! -- TheSlyFox 00:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
15. For. Nice work chaps. His Grace, the Duke 11:37, May 24 2007 (BST)
16. every time this article has come back from being nuked it has sucked. this is an exception, in fact, it is very good, so for --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
17. Yes sir, thank you sir. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 22:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
18. Very For: Funny, irreverent, goes in a direction you don't expect it to, and isn't either "omg anime r00lz u all" or "omg anime sux0rz u suk". The sort of thing you could confuse with a "real" article for a few minutes. Excellent indeed. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 00:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Excrement-I tasted bile in the back of my throat --Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 02:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
2. -~ 12:54, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Against per UF in the Pee Review: Excellent concept, could be funnier (still). --THINKER 18:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Halfhearted Against. Not good, but not terrible. Just boring. --Emmzee 01:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Against Sorry, this is well written but I just don't get the overall point. The Oblong Lobster 14:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

• @Jedravent: Is that supposed to be ironic, or is it a mistake? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Mistake. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 16:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• I agree with the person above that this article definitely needs a full protect. -- TheSlyFox 00:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Needs a full protect. Maybe even if it doesn't make it to the front page. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 00:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 13.5 blobs of Sponk

1. Nom & For - Made me laugh, definitely a quality article... not to mention the highly unique writing style -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Yes, please. --General Insineratehymn 02:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For - Blah blah blah - It's gneomI 02:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
4. --L 07:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Definitely worth it! Very funny. --JewBoy 14:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
6. For. -- Mitch 15:06, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For- Ihave to admit I was afraid I wans't going to like it, but who can dislike quality sperm jokes?--Gaberou 20:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Very nice -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
9. Yes - Made me spunk! The Oblong Lobster 17:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
10. Why didn't i vote for on this before? I mean i read it, then forgot to vote. --Emmzee 23:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
11. Fro --THE 20:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For -- 131.170.90.2 01:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For. Remembers me of the last chapter of "Everything you blahblah about sex blahblah afraid to ask". -- herr doktor needsAgear  [scream!] 20:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
14. A spunky attempt at a subject matter that could be a real handful. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 22:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
15. For —Braydie 21:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Snore--Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Sorry But this one doesn't do it for me.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

• I decided to be italic, and transformed the Sperm article into this. --L 07:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 14 humorous brain-shaped hats

1. Self nom & For A brilliant idea by El Zoof, expanded and rewritten by yrs. truly --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:43, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Approved. -- herr doktor needsAgear  [scream!] 02:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For. Well, what the hell did you expect? I merely laid the corpse out on the slab, it was Cap'n Ben who attached the electrodes and sent it lumbering towards the Village People. --El Zoof 05:44, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For It should be featured without a doubt. Kip the Dip 12:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Oh my god, this is brilliant. For. --Emmzee 13:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Dig very good stuff --THINKER 18:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
7. EAT THAT! - I would say yes. The Oblong Lobster 22:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For. Devilishly brilliant. Near-perfect comedy. YouFang 01:05, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For. -- Mitch 13:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For The White House Brain Roll sealed the deal. Hugs! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 02:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For. ~ 13:05, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
12. Feb 14. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 18:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For Don alun 11:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For Took me too long to get to this baby.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

1. not --Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. I was going to nominate it myself around Valentine's Day, but if y'all think it's ready now, okay. Kip the Dip 12:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Would be perfect for Valentine's Day. But that's a while off.The Oblong Lobster 22:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

I had originally intended it to be released before Valentine's Day in the hope that it got picked up as front-page material for that day... but then I got stuck and ran away and hid from the article. Thanks once again to Cap'n Ben for rescuing it. --El Zoof 21:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 10 Cro-Magnon poets

1. For. Quasi that made me laugh. --He's a radical rat! ^{(Talk page!/Contribs)}
2. Onka-Bonka! -- herr doktor needsAgear  [scream!] 16:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Article good for brain. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:45, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Still for, although most of it is over my head. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Weak for. It's hilarious, I laughed out loud at "Ug no able record CSI: Miami," but it's a little too short... but funny enough to compensate. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 03:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
6. --L 10:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Self-for. --Emmzee 00:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Dig but Ug digress --THINKER 20:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
10. Fug, even though I voted Agug last time -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
11. Featured article good. --General Insineratehymn 02:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
12. Abstinence Lifted Good luck.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:54, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 20:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

1. crap--Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against Lovely article, but I think MO's article did the caveman thing better. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:23, 14 May 2007
2. nope, nope, nope. not funny, semi-duplicate article and vote-whoring on irc is a great way to seal your fate. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
3. *sigh* I'm sorry. Against. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 22:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Abstain because I think that two caveman themed articles so near each other is uncool. Really good though. Will renom at an unspecified date.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:47, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment... So? We had two communist articles in a row, and all that happened was that it got added to Worst 100 Reflections on 2007. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 22:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

• Hey, it's just my rationale for abstinence. Not attempting to convince anyone one way or the other. And plus, why knowingly get added to something with worst in the title.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

• Just vote already. Gol-dang kids with your highfalootin' words like "rationale" and "or". Pah! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

• Peh, you curmudgeonly old fogies with your incomprehension of words such as or. I like the article, but my will remains firm. You know what else is firm? Ironing boards.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Alright, my will is less firm than I originally made it out to be. Sue me.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 12.5 Ancient Chinese Secrets

1. Self Nom + For because I like this article of mine. Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 04:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Dig ..and to think it was on VFD not to long ago.. Great overhaul! --THINKER 04:32, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For It's better to vote for now than for later, in bed.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For I've been watching this article since way before the vfd, it's completely different now and I think it's finally pretty good.  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 18:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For Splendid.--Dr. Fenwick 19:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
6. For. Revenge vote. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:48, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For. -- herr doktor needsAgear  [scream!] 16:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For, since the damn pic has been fixed --Sir Shandon 15:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
9. a-FOR-ism. The pic is fantastic. Oh, and the writing's good too. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 22:08, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For, a charming article. A LOL, indeed. --63.24.61.167 22:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For. --Emmzee 13:17, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For --User:Pwner Ganondorf 17:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
14. Confucious say:This article will be featured. Lucky letters are:S, T, F, U. Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines

1. shit sandwich --Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against...if that image is fixed I might change my vote.--Sir Shandon 17:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Note: I fixed the odd edges of the fortune cookie  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 18:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

The image is strangely assembled from four parts, however, when you press refresh theres a new fortune! its the only good part of the old article. cept maybe "how to be hysterical." Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 22:40, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Not funny. --So So 06:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

• I'm gonna think on my vote for a while. I've been pretty ruthless tonight thus far, and the turn around in this article from its stint on VFD (which can't have been much more than a week ago) is enormous, but sadly it still fails to hit that secret spot for me. The funny spot, not the other one...pervert! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 08:30, 13 May 2007

• Thinker...Ummm VFD? So was this up for deletion lolz?--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E  throw a snowball  09:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Not this version of it no. Extensive work has been done to it since it was on VFD. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:32, 14 May 2007

• Aw is it like that? Didn't do too bad, and the comparison is pretty steep.. The cookie is cool? Who can say...
  But, Leatherbound hasn't answered my call for Ups or downs, so whatev... :) --THINKER 09:50, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Good luck Leatherboundbooks. It's pretty darn near impossible to get Ceridwyn's vote, apparently.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Not at all. I've voted for plenty of good quality articles. Just the recent batch don't quite hit the mark for me. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:17, 13 May 2007

• Well, considering I put it up for VFD because it was under the wrong name and was a completely different and terrible article, think of them as seperate entities. (Do it for the random fortune fortune cookie, if only the random fortune fortune cookie) Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 13:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 16 Land-locked ports

1. Self-nom and for. Good pee review, my first attempt at being featured. Rogpyvbc 22:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Quality article. Good work on the tense change. --Kelpan 22:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For Quality - This deserves featuring. Matt lobster 23:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:26, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Dig absolutely --THINKER 05:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Beautiful satire of a subject all too often made into crap.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For, because it eases my conscience over all those hours spent logging and then burning stuff just for the hell of it. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  18:24, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For I like the irony. Ethereal 04:55, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For. Funny stuff. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 04:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For - It's gneomI 12:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
13. Genius. --Emmzee 13:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For - [Insert vote whore here] --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 01:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
15. for in school today, some idiots use the day after tomorrow as a reference for their presentation on global warming. what the fuck? the experience makes this all too funny in the saddest of ways. Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 02:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
16. For. But gets a bit weak near the end. goshzillacorrespondence 19:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
17. For We all must do our part Megamanfanx7 13:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
18. For --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 21:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

1. It's not worthy! It's not worthy! --Steve Johnsenson 05:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:41, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against Sorry, its a decent article, but not feature worthy imo. Just didn't hit that spot... ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 06:19, 13 May 2007
2. Against Very well written, but it lacks anything really humorous. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

• Dantoller has voted against this because I nominated an article of his for deletion. I don't think his vote should count.Rogpyvbc 18:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Seeing as he essentially admitted as much in his reasoning, I agree. But that's not my place. Ask an admin.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
    • I also agree, I am like an angry child...

dantoller

• Thanks for changing your vote, Dantoller. But I don't think I can accept a for vote for the wrong reasons either, so I've removed your vote altogether. Rogpyvbc 17:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
  • How very honorable of you. I would never have done such a thing. That's why I'm going to hell and you're not.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 17 Cosby Kids

Featured —rc (t) 05:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Nom and For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 20:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Heh. -- 20:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For Fat people make me laugh --Don alun 10:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For Yea! The pictures are gone!--Dr. Fenwick 20:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For, a wonderful slice of pie. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Dig seeing things like this make me smile. Good stuff. --THINKER 22:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For. Returning the favor...and I also like it. --Mr.Vib 23:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Self-for Wow, lots of votes. I'm glad I you guys liked it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For Very funny article! I even took the time to read it, yo! --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 21:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
10. Yes. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
11. Hey hey hey! The article's as educational as the show. YouFang 19:13, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
12. YES I find this most entertaining. The Oblong Lobster 19:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
13. Recently saw the film, otherwise I wouldn't have the foggiest idea what this was. Nice little article... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 22:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
14. Oh baby. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 03:47, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
15. For bwahah. noicely done mate -- Ker
16. For very funny, well written --Quall 22:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
17. For Very good article :D --Spaz 22:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
18. For...interesting and funny presentation.--Sir Shandon 23:42, 26 May 2007
19. WordFront page! --Hell0ihateyou 01:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
20. For. Definitely a quality re-work -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 03:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Sadly Against Though it's really funny those last two images made me change my mind.--Dr. Fenwick 20:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
2. This is bad, really bad--Steve Johnsenson 05:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. All around mediocre. --So So 07:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Where's the love? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
3. utter rubbish --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:04, 28 May 2007 (UTC)