==[[UnNews:Hylian teen arrested for property damage]]==
==[[UnNews:Hylian teen arrested for property damage]]==
−
{{s|+7 Heart Pieces}}
+
{{s|+8 Heart Pieces}}
+
*'''All my base are belong to this article''' One of the funniest things I've read in Uncyclopedia. Congrats. Groove Bones 13:58 24 February 2007
*'''Nom, and a vote for.''' Really well written news article that is funny without having to mention kittens or grues etc.--Benny Goodman 17:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
*'''Nom, and a vote for.''' Really well written news article that is funny without having to mention kittens or grues etc.--Benny Goodman 17:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
*'''For'''. I tried to buy a Wii. After failing to locate one at any local store, I was reduced to wandering the streets yelling ''"Wii!"''. Send bail money. Fast. Bubba's got this look in his eye. --{{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 19:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
*'''For'''. I tried to buy a Wii. After failing to locate one at any local store, I was reduced to wandering the streets yelling ''"Wii!"''. Send bail money. Fast. Bubba's got this look in his eye. --{{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 19:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Vote for an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
When voting For or Against, please change the score number accordingly—this saves a lot of time later.
IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
Nonsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button () above the edit box.
When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the article using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
Voters: don't be dicks and do be constructive with criticism. Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
Articles from all namespaces (including UnNews, HowTo, UnBooks, etc.) are eligible for VFH. Votes against articles based on namespace prejudice will be discarded.
If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
THIS IS A VOTE, NOT A DISCUSSION.
If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it HERE.
Violators of this policy will be
flushed down, down, down.
Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )
SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must spend at least one week on pee review before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time and require no review (though it is still recommended).
VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.
VFH IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
Nom and For - My first "style joke" article, and I believe it came out rather swimmingly. --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 17:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
This is an entry in an electronic registry affirming the quality of a licensed submission to a web site, known by certain laypersons as a vote for. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 18:51, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
The man sat down in front of a square screen, with an unusual number of small buttons mounted beneath him, each with a letter of the Roman alphabet. Drawing himself up, he typed for.--Procopius 21:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
For. Altough I'm ashamed to tell that I could not read it until the end, not that I am an unpolished working-class thug (yet still a sensible human being) and instead I may add the point regarding the article's prolixity, that is an writing style on itself but become somewhat unfashionable during the XX century when, by the way, all sensibilities become a little blunt, I'm afraid to tell. -- herrdoktorneedsAcharge[scream!] 21:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
All my base are belong to this article One of the funniest things I've read in Uncyclopedia. Congrats. Groove Bones 13:58 24 February 2007
Nom, and a vote for. Really well written news article that is funny without having to mention kittens or grues etc.--Benny Goodman 17:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
For. I tried to buy a Wii. After failing to locate one at any local store, I was reduced to wandering the streets yelling "Wii!". Send bail money. Fast. Bubba's got this look in his eye. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 19:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Against It's funny, but a lot more could be done with it besides the "breaking pots" angle. Throw in some chicken abuse, lawn defacement, etc. and I'll gladly remove my Against. —rc(t) 19:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Strong For- I can't believe no one has thought of this already lol --Uncle J 20:21, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
That was unintentional... I hadn't read that article. Though it is interesting that I happened to write it within a close vicinity of time after. I never intend to plagiarize, I'm not a Carlos Mencia. I attempt avoid that at all costs, and I actually did a bit of searching on here for any UnNews related to Link/Zelda to make sure it wasn't too similar to anything. I happened to miss the fact that the RPG article, which has conceptual similarities, could have any resemblance. - AhhDiddums 21:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Nom,Writer,For&Comment All grammar mistakes are intentional or assumed intentional if I actaully made a few mistakes.--Lt. Wyoming 05:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Like "actaully"? JK; we all do.—Lenoxus 00:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
For The pictures really help the article.--Gaberou 05:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Against. It's well-written, but unfocused.--Procopius 16:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Against - What have I told you about formatting, silly bean? Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 17:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Weak for They are right it could be better but it's still good.--Dr. Fenwick 18:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
For. it does need ..streamlining, bloody good though - jack mort |cunt| talk - 20:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment. The current name doesn't quite seem to fit the precise concept; I've proposed several possible moves on the talkpage (though not a template on the main, because there is more than one possibility). — Lenoxus 00:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
For Cap and Ben said it all. —Braydie 02:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Go for it. --AndorinKato 05:56, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
For I saw Modusoperandi moving a bunch of redirects to this page around on recent changes earlier today, and talking up plenty of space whilst doing it. Also, its a funny article, with good drawings. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 06:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
For more pages with octopus. Oh, and babies. Both are adorable.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 07:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
SnF. Gloriously quasi-featured with 15 (hell, fifteen!) votes. I guess it deserves a second chance. -- herrdoktorneedsAcharge[scream!] 16:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
For, and I'd like to go on a ramble about how this is the best example of rewrite I've ever seen: It is not only terrifically hilarious, but it accomplishes this while including most of the content of an article that was terrible in the process. In the future, I'm referencing this to educate others on how rewrites should be done. :)--<<>> 21:25, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
For, as an active fnord participant fnord in fnord public fnord school fnord, which fnord I fnord consider fnord brainwashing. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 01:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
For. It was a sad day for Porchesia, but perhaps by remembering them they can live on.John1728 02:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
No, thanks. Internet memes, vandalism apology, not factual but a little obvious. Sorry. -- herrdoktorneedsAcharge[scream!] 02:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment. The last paragraph (not a Moridillo piece) sort of explains the joke and spoils it. Remove it and I'll vote for.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 05:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment agreed and removed, with my apologies to infinitemonkey. ~ 11:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Strong For. I laughed through the entire thing. (By the way, a false article deleted by a Wikipedia admin doesn't exactly count as a meme, does it?) --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 06:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
For. /me bows my head honoring the people of Porchesia. ~ 11:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm gonna say yes for the same reason I felt compelled to edit it. Plus, the plight of the Porchesians must be heard! -- HindleyiteConverse 14:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
FOR Great work of investigative journalism. ((User:Ayatollah Gurkhmeini/sig}} 17:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment. I've unintentionally created a storm of confusion over the naming: First, I proposed a move to Porchesian Holocaust (where it is currently), then Flyingfeline went ahead with the move (which I didn't notice, not having updated the page in enough time), then I changed the move template to Porchesia, but this was removed by Flyingfeline out of an understandable exasperation. (I also changed my explanation for this on the talkpage, but have since moved that to Flyingfeline's talk after it got blanked (again understandably) in the middle of my editing. So... yeah. We'll all get through this, I'm sure. —Lenoxus 00:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Self-Nom and For. This may struggle to get featured, due to its Britishness, but I really want to give it a go. In a nutshell, David Cameron is our leader of the opposition and has been often criticised for focusing on style over substance, most notably with his video blog: WebCameron. --15Mickey20(talk to Mickey) 22:07, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
For. I have no idea what it's talking about, but I liked it. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 23:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
For. The Britishness isn't a problem at all. It seems like the same political bullshit thrown around in any democracy. Pretty good.--Procopius 01:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Against Ya I get what he is trying to say and I understand the struggle of labor vs. conservative in England but its too political and not enough funnyness (my patented word) Weasel3689 18:00 21 February 2007 (UTC)
For Britishness (or Britishocity) is no problem here, it's a very good satire on politicians trying to be hip in general. Very good article. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 05:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
For. It's good. --Zarbag 10:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
This is my first time voting Tory. I feel dirty. For. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 12:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
For. Not that I'm a thatcherite or anything... not that I'm saying you can't *think* I'm a thatcherite, you can if you want - it's ok by me --OliproAnchorKUN (Harass) 12:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
For I don't vote much, so this deserved it, prepare for launch.... (yes it's back, albeit in a shorter form) ...3...2...1...
For I was laughing by the end of the first paragraph. It may be focused on a UK politician, but it's also a satire on a variety of political types. Phantom Grammar 14:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
For. Don't know who he is, don't need to know. Beautiful concept. --So So 13:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Against, sorry, I didn't find it that funny. He doesn't come off as sufficiently out of touch. How about using outdated youth terms like 'bodacious' or 'mad for it'?--Nydas 14:02, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Nom and For Fantastic, honorable mention at PLS. —Braydie 16:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
He's my friend when things get rough. THIS was my childhood people, thankfully it has had no lasting vegetable marrows. For. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 17:05, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Yeah. Just like an acid trip, but without the flash backs. Iddy Bitty 21:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
I have no idea what this is based on and don't really want to know. All I can say is For. --15Mickey20(talk to Mickey) 23:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm all for freakin' out man! Aah! Bugs on my skin, bugs on my skin! --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 23:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
For ....hey is that a flute over there? - jack mort |cunt| talk - 19:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
PHOUR CUZ I ER SEW JAKKD UP RIET NIOW. I loved this show. Not really, but this article is nice. --love, gustavtalk at menope 22:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
N+F. Damnit, this is a great article and should have been featured in its last swing around VFH. Do right by Kwakerjak this time.--Procopius 01:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Strong ForKwakerjak was a visionary, and he got wasted by the system. We squeezed him for all the cheap laughs we could get and threw him in the trash. It was an injustice to make him a one-hit wonder with Napoleon Bonaparte. He hasn't contributed in a while, but dammit, he could have been one of the greats. Sorry for rambling, and maybe I wouldn't have cared at all if he hadn't added to my own French Revolution article in the first place, but Kwakerjak is one of our most underrated authors, and the least we can do is posthumously feature something of his. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 03:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Weak against. Reads too much like a newspaper column from the time — a very clever column, mind you, but not much else. I'm picturing the speaker as an engaging, personable history teacher sprinkling lectures with fun commentary like this; I'm not picturing Featured. Then again, that could definitely be my own vague bias against commentary... —Lenoxus 05:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Strong For. Both mostly true AND hilarious. This is what I picture the best Uncyclopedia articles being.--<<>> 13:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Strong for I am flipping my Whig over this article! And that its written with a hint of newspaper style is part of its charm. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 16:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
weak against Although this article is good in many places, the history teacher Lenoxus is referring to must be biased in a way I didn't find funny. Is saying a candidate ran as a stupid redneck over and over that funny? --»His Majesty King George VI(the boxes) 02:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment. What's funny is a party embracing that image, and getting the populace drunk enough to buy into it.--Procopius 02:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment. Not only that, but the article highlights the fact that this strategy, which anyone could easily see through, wasn't an isolated incident to this particular election. His cross-referencing other cases of the same ridiculous plan working throughout American history were what made this a gem.--<<>> 03:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment. Yeah... yeah... but... to me, that's kind of, I don't know, geekish. It's like an article discussing some strategy in World of Warcraft and repeatedly pointing out how the strategy shouldn't work but does anyway. It's like a decent standup routine, or lunch-break tale ("so then Harrison was all like, 'I'm a redneck, yo!' And man, you just know that one would slide."). As a basically liberal American, I'm all too used to the "redneck strategy" working; I'm way past the point where it's either funny or depressing in itself: it's just another tool, you know? grr... out of words... —Lenoxus 01:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
For enough that, I have to admit, I'm a little turned on right now. I can't be the only one...I am? Oh. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 18:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
for. you're never alone modus. *jacks* - jack mort |cunt| talk - 19:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
For -- the "look at me, I'm a redneck" line near the end clinched it for me. -- Rei 22:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment: I generally like the idea and am currently working on some subtle ways to change it, mainly by making it seem more like the "bad content" really is part of the article (not just "This sentence contains the word contains"-type stuff), so that it rings truer. —Lenoxus 05:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
For Just random enough to be hilarious, the thumbs are up -- (Elmis 11:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC))
Weak For I smirked a little, not the top article but a good one and better than many of the article already featured --Uncle J 21:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
For Is this a vote? What does Humorous mean?--Dantoller 01:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Against Come on this is predictable and not funny. Having this as a featured article would be just wrong! It should be huffed (yes I know the irony in that) --Marto 85 07:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
For, although I'm still annoyed that he yelled at me after that whole Golden Calf thing. Zealous prick. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 06:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
For. Wow, you know the site is good when a page this great only warrants an "honorable mention." --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 01:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
For. Niiiiice. --El Zoof 06:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
For Mae West would've contracted and died of AIDS had she lived past 1980. Sorry I didn't light your fire mhaille. --AmericanBastard 01:17, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
For, although I am disappointed to see so many red links in a Procopius article. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 16:20, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Score: +12 damn times that Squiggle has gone and put a really, really long title on a page. I mean, really, it just goes on forever and ever...
Nom & For: I submit to you another PLS entry, winner in the "Best Illustrated Article" category, from Squiggle himself. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 18:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
For, although I didn't just pee it for self nomination - I wanted it checked over after I saw RadX's review, which included this: "I think we have a winner in Captain Petey, though, as an article it's not fantastic." But yeah, the nomination is appreciated. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 03:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Nom & For: another PLS entry; winner in the "Best Article" category. Definitely deserves to make it on the front page. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 16:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
ForA common lie: George washington could not tell a lie. This is a lie perpetuated bu the liar who in fact lied once to tell you that he could not lie. Weasel3689 21:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
For Very funny. All that without Oscar, Chuck or T (not that there's anyhting wrong with them!). The habitual liar was gold! --Marto 85 07:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Self nom and for. I put a lot of hard work into this article, to make it look like a movie trailer. I think everybody will get the jokes. PF4Eva, the King of ImaginationtalkContributions 22:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
For. I've been watching this one since it was started, and it's come a long way. <baritone>It will be featured.</baritone> Nice job, PF4Eva! --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 07:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
For. Perhaps a few too many quotes in the way, but other than that, quite funny. ;) -- Rei 23:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Against. The only funny part was the Youtube vid. --So So 02:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
For. A thoroughly informative document, which will be of as much use as any other when the bombs fall. El Zoof 04:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
For a great satire on the pointlessness of nuclear war. Loved the line "We made it! Now it's just us and the cockroaches!" --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 05:29, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
For. Oh freakin hell Wehpudicabok! I was gonna nom this...you know, eventually. --Anyone 14:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Hell yeah. REALLY FUNNY.--Xzeta 21:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
For. It reminds me of growing up in the 50's. Except I didn't grow up in the 50's. And I didn't grow up. What were we talking about?--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 04:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Strong for. This is why HF is Writer of the Year.--Procopius 15:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
For I thought it was pretty funny.--Jsemmens 17:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
ForDuck and cove --- BOOOM!!! Up it goes! The Humbled Master 21:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
For Now I can't wait for the warning! --Kenvalyi 14:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
For a masterstroke of literature, en par with Milton, Swift or some other drunken author of ages past. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 15:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Nom and For I found this one especially tickled my funny bone. It has great images, lost of jokes, and a good concept. Looks good to me. --love, gustavtalk at menope 21:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
For Utterly hilarious. God, I'm such a geek... -- Rei 01:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
F☭R, Even though it didn't tell me a damn thin' 'bout livin' in an RPG. 03:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
FOR, I wrote it a long time ago and decided to publish here in uncyclo' just to make some people laugh a little. I wasn't expecting a nomination. Thanks Gustavo! --DAME::FoxyBabe::TALK 12:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
For Great stuff...but really nerdy! Smrt-guy 23:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey, nerdy stuff can be fun. I also make money writing game reviews for a website. Oh God, I'm a nerdy girl. --DAME::FoxyBabe::TALK 13:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
For, even though I know nothing about video games that aren't Pro Evo Soccer. --15Mickey20(talk to Mickey) 23:33, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
For great justice! Wait, wrong genre. Um. Have I lost an eighth? --El Zoof 02:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
For Really good.--Lt. Wyoming 04:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
For. I remember when Ultima IV was cutting edge . . . sigh . . . but nice to know people still don't lock things in RPGs.--Procopius 15:33, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
For Dancing mushrooms are funny. --Naughty Budgie 08:49, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
For Damn I love HowTos! High General Grue 04:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Weak for. Some of the writing could be cleaner, but the satire on a subject that desperately needs it is dead on. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 02:07, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
For Damn it feels good to be an adventura. --ЖKaliryes, I play Pokémon 16:08, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
For LOL, welcome in every house and free to mess with the dog, the pretty daughter, and open cabinets to take things, they don't mind lol --Uncle J 16:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
For A million hit points and maximum charisma! --Cap'n Sir BenGUNWotMVFHVFP 23:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)