# Uncyclopedia:VFH/old

(Difference between revisions)

• Vote for an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
• Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
• When voting For or Against, please change the score number accordingly—this saves a lot of time later.
• Nonsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button () above the edit box.
• When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the article using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
• Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
• Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
• Voters: don't be dicks and do be constructive with criticism. Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
• Articles from all namespaces (including UnNews, HowTo, UnBooks, etc.) are eligible for VFH. Votes against articles based on namespace prejudice will be discarded.
• If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
THIS IS A VOTE, NOT A DISCUSSION. If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it HERE.
Violators of this policy will be assassinated.

# Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must spend at least one week on pee review before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time and require no review (though it is still recommended).

VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.

VFH IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.

## All That

Score: -0.5
• Self-nom and for: Funnier than the original version I wrote back in September. Better jokes, better pictures, not repetitive to the point of being unreadable. While some of you say that the show isn't as good as You Can't Do That on Television, I still think All That should have a place on the front page. But that's just one guy's opinion. -- PF4Eva 23:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against: Too factual. 64.252.116.71 09:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• RE: I fixed this problem. I exaggerated things a bit and added more jokes. I hope this takes care of factuality vs. satire. Thank you for your concern. PF4Eva 23:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Just not doing anything for me. Sorry.--Procopius 00:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

## Prog Rock

Score: +7 hour keyboard solo
• Nom and Strong For; Hilarious. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Although, I think it should also contain a section on prog metal as well. -- 11:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. The tabulature alone is a joy. Lemon. 01:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For my favourite music genre. -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, if only for the tabbing. -- Hindleyite Converse 19:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong for. The musical notation made me laugh out loud.--Procopius 00:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Pro. herr doktor needsAshuttle  [scream!] 01:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

## Unlimited Unstory

Score: -1 content-free stories
• Self-Nomination. This is best considered a game instead of an article. --L 05:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Fun game, but its nature makes it random.--Procopius 00:36, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against, the best of the "unlimited" bunch, but it suffers from "too many cooks" (a problem endemic to the genre).-- 01:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

## Penis joke

Score: 0 comedy phallus
• Nom+For. Any article at this title shouldn't be any good. This is - David Gerard 00:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• DICKSDICKSDICKS Faggots --KATIE!! 01:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Long For Did you know my Pen is huge?--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 02:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. meh -- 08:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. {puke} - User:Guest/sig 08:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. We're better than this. Aren't we?--Winston 11:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 21:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 21:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Actually has some potential for comedy, if it had any structure. Lemon. 21:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Dikfer. "What's a dikfer?" you may ask. --Anyone 19:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Supress immature chuckles... I'm too sophisticated for this... Oh, I can't choke back the laughter... This is really well written. For. --User:Nintendorulez 20:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. There's no such thing as being too good for a penis joke, although the article does seem a little short. (Snicker) It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 21:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Man, you guys used to be cool. Now look at yourselves! You can't even laugh at the penis jokes!! 23:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. More sophisticated than the title suggests.--Procopius 23:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against Too short, too much of a list. It has potential but it is not living up to it, I wouldn't vote it for deletion or anything but... Mr. Briggs Inc. 00:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?
• Against Long, but not enough meat. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

## UnBooks:The O. Henry Collection

Score: +6 ironic Christmas presents received
• More or less a Self Nom and For I wrote the most of the hobo segment, e|m|c did the majority. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• 100% For - I love it. Whoever wrote this should receive a Nobel Peace Prize. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Mildly weak 4. --L 14:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 01:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for, OMG, it's taken multiple sittings to read through it all. It's good, don't get me wrong, but it would be better as a series, rather than one ginormous page.-- 07:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, though I agree with Mod's assessment. Still, good stuff.--Procopius 00:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

## MENSA Entrance Test

• Nom and For. One of my favorite articles on the whole site. Don't just discount it because it looks like a list, actually read it, because it isn't a list. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for - Too many red links. Needs a bit more expansion, but I like it. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:10, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• 4. --L 05:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. That's awesome. Spang 05:38, 4 Dec 2006
• For Yes cool great! Alksub 06:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For It's ridiculous, but hilarious. - unsigned
• Against. What's MENSA? Where's the obligatory so-called-experts box for those who don't know? The questions are all variations on one joke. Inferior to many other candidates here on VFH. - User:Guest/sig 09:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations, I just added the Wikipediapar template whose absense you were balefully lamenting. Now your complaint is nullified! --L 04:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. A fine start. Needs {{expansion}}, and the hamster in the microwave made me ill.--Winston 11:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Its a hilarious and has a definite intellectual appeal as well --User:Mf1790/Sig - no timestamp
Um, what about it?-- 13:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
That's the diff that shows who and when, nutty bunny.-- 21:05, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against. This article practically made me wet my pants with laughter. But, as Sikon pointed out, it does rely on one joke too much. And it's a little on the short side, even if it isn't a list (which I would say it is). User:Wehpudicabok/sig 05:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Heavy reliance on one joke, needs expanding. Tomtyke 15:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Sure it's the same overall joke, but It's done well. --Anyone 18:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- Hindleyite Converse 18:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Procopius 00:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Any self respecting nerd must like it. --drew 05:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

## 001

Score: +009
• Renom & For. An outstanding article that never should have been taken down in the first place.-- 14:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• ReFor Madness!--Procopius 14:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 19:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 19:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against.InfiniteMonkey 20:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, although I forgot whatever it was I said as a comment for this last time. I'm sure it was both witty and inappropriate.-- 21:18, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against. Not bad, but I think it's too manic and unfocused for a feature. Lemon. 21:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For! 001 and I went to the same elementary school. She's Dutch too, whaddayouknow. -- di Mario 21:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 00:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• 004. --L 05:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Could have sworn I already voted for this.--Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 09:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For yet again.--Nydas 10:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against--Winston 11:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. herr doktor needsAshuttle  [scream!] 17:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Yeah, I did! I know I did! --Anyone 18:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For -- The Llama Llover!!! 19:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

## The Free World

Score: +7
• Renom and for, because this article rules. And, it still has the thing about the cars that I came up with. :) -- Hindleyite Converse 13:30, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For This is close to the best article currently listed on VFH. Feature it! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 14:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 19:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• 4. Feature it! --L 05:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Now, this is more like it.--Winston 12:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. I could of swore I voted for these articles before... --Anyone 18:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. The money section is brilliant.--Procopius 00:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

## Flying Gypsies

Score: +5
• Re-Nom. The writer of this article believes it would have been featured if left on the page, so I'm putting it back. It's definately good enough for feature.-- 13:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For --—Braydie 13:29, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Hindleyite Converse 13:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For The images alone made me laugh. -- 16:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 19:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. InfiniteMonkey 20:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• FOR! I nommed it last time. --  Holla | CUN 21:27, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against.--Winston 12:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For -- The Llama Llover!!! 06:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Didn't I already do this once? --Anyone 18:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. It's well-done, but I didn't get the premise. That's my fault.--Procopius 00:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

## Sartre

Score: +3
• N+F Phun 4 teh smurt peepol. Lemon wrote this. 08:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC) The preceding unsigned comment was added by Citrusmirakel (talk • contribs)
• For. Ah, Paris after the war. Was there ever a better time to be alive and hopeless? Good stuff.--Procopius 14:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Nice -- sannse (talk) 15:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, I fixed the nom; you crazy kids voted for a redirect page. Also, it's a self nom. Also, also, it's good. -- 02:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against, this could be tenfold better if it was better documented. Sartre's works should provide plenty of opportunities of satire. --Zig 11:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

## Internet Movie Database

Score: +17 movie(s) found. Search again?
• N+F. - User:Guest/sig 20:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• For --—Braydie 20:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For --Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 04:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- 07:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Well done indeed. Lemon 07:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For So true Prolix 11:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 11:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Nicely done.--Procopius 14:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, but that review is mine. Just so you know. You can tell because I always spell it "porpaganda".-- 21:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Very For -- 02:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For --KWild 04:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. About as good as the Awful Movie Database parodies. - unsigned, not counted Sorry. --L 14:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For --AtionSong 16:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Nice work.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 20:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Absolutely not. Heh, just kidding For... but you should've seen the look on your face! 23:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• FOR Very good, might I say classy in an IMDB sense.--drew 05:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• FOR User:Kakun/sig 05:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

## Enid Blyton

Score: The Secret Seven
• N & F. I can still remember reading with baited breath when Julian first showed Dick the secret passage. A beautiful moment from my childhood. -- 20:34, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. It reminds me of my childhood. My terrible, terrible childhood.-- 07:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For because I wrote it. Thanks for the nomination.--Nydas 13:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Rather! 15Mickey20 21:45, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For--Winston 12:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For greater Anglo-American understanding. I enjoyed this despite having almost no knowledge of the subject.--Procopius 00:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

## New Hampshire Merchant Cat

Score: +9 racist litter boxes
• Self-nom and For. I've liked this for a long time, and no one on Pee Review seemed to hate it, so, um, there's a peek into my subconscious.--Procopius 16:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For --—Braydie 16:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 17:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For So randomly funny --Gaberou 22:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For cat satire. -- 05:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• For pretty kitty cats! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 19:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 01:16, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. I read this back when it was first written and thought it was highly excellent. --Anyone 18:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Just to see it on the front page. --goshzillacorrespondence 00:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

## Dear John letter

Score: +15 versions enjoyed
• Nom and For. Ninety seven hilarious articles for the price of one. Highly original. Technically accomplished. Fun to edit. Kind to children. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 06:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For Wasn't sure, but the second last paragraph sold me. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For a new humourous letter with every pageload. ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 11:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For- I make it $9.35251 {{\times 10^{{19}}}}$ articles for the price of one. --Sir Jam 11:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• 4 - Oh, that is fuckin' clever!User:Tooltroll/sig 11:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For --Zyrac 20:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against too close to reality for my taste. Been getting letters like that for the past 18 years. I co-operated with authorities, and still...No -- di Mario 20:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Wow, for. -- Hindleyite Converse 20:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For --goshzillacorrespondence 00:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against' -- Oh, ye Gads!!! Anyway, it's too short for an article, too long for a dear john letter. At least to me. Feureau 04:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Clarification ~ Actually, it's as long as several of its competitors combined: 15:04, 12 November 2006 ‎Dear John letter (hist) ‎[16,775 bytes] ‎Todd Lyons ~ but the content is random. It's meant to be re-loaded and re-read several dozen (97?) times.  :) ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 05:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong for. This article screams at that heartless bitch to be on the front page.--Procopius 13:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• For --—Braydie 13:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Brilliant idea brilliantly executed. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:43, 1 December 2006
• Five it's like a For but one integer more emphatic.Nullius in Verba 19:37, 2 December 2006 (UTC) (UTC)
• For; I love this article. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• For--Winston 12:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, but only because it occasionally mentions "restraining order". Ahhh, good times.-- 07:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. I like random, but it can be sometimes too random. Still good though. --Anyone 18:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• FOR! Very good, but by the time you read this ill be looking at the next article.

## n00bl3ss3 0bl1ghey

Score: +5 INSERT PITHY REMARK
• whFore and Comment more out of fear and surprise than anything else. Billy Dee! BerogenVFH 02:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Now with added SophistineTM
• For. It could probably use a format touchup, things like an introductory paragraph and such, but it's cute. --monika 03:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For Agreed it could use a little work; but very funny already. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• D'accorde alzough zhat loekes suspicionally vraiment comment le Saississon d'Roisette, vous Rascallion! -- di Mario 20:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For Became a good article in a very short period of time.--Scott 02:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It has its moments, but the article feels a bit too random for me. Liked the quotation from Mark, though.--Procopius 00:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

## The Critique of Pure Reason

Score: +6 ontological proofs of the article's excellence
• Nominating and for. Let's prove that we are not just a bunch of jesters, but a bunch of damn smart jesters. herr doktor needsAshuttle  [scream!] 19:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Four and second. I contributed a very small part, which I personally think is the most brilliant piece of controversy mankind has ever seen since the invention of Divorce by King Henry VIII. -- di Mario 19:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• For I really enjoy voting for myself. Really. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For. Wait -- does the VFH page exist or has my mind projected its experience onto it?--Procopius 13:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• 4 1337! But seriously, on a cerebral plain I think I contributed some Deep Thought to this article. -- di Mario 17:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• For "If man cannot vote thrice, then man cannot vote at all" - Ludwig von Wittgenstein. -- di Mario 17:50, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Indeed. --Anyone 18:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

## U.S. Presidential Election, 1948

Score: +7 pathetic re-election campaigns
• Self-nomination, and affrimative vote. Yep, I did another one. Let it sit in Pee Review for a week, too. --Kwakerjak 18:22, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• For, which I hope isn't the kiss of death...I found it funny--Shandon 22:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. USS Dewey Kicks Ass. And also obscure links. These are what make an article great. --Anyone 21:32, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Wait, didn't I already vote for this one? I could've SWORN I did...-- 23:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• For I never realised just hoe hilarious American elections are. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. I've been watching this one for awhile.--Procopius 13:41, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• For; just as good as all the other U.S. Presidential Election, 19XX/200X articles, if not better. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against more U.S. election coverage.--Winston 12:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For more US election coverage. Johnleemk 10:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

## The Vagina Monologues

Score: +14 genitalia that won't shut the hell up
• Nomination and For because puns rock. -- Hindleyite Converse 20:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• For Literalism strikes again. Fucking unions. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:14, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• For --monika 22:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• For The later half redeems. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Heh. I felt like I needed to build some foundation before the payload delivery, but I'm sure the intro could be tightened up. :) ~ 17:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. I put a lot of thought into this, but welcome any additions or edits to make it better. ~ 16:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• For, obviously. -- 14:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Foreplay -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 14:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• For...Todd's got culture, all of the sudden...--Shandon 22:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• For...lots of culture...--Kevin Bell 02:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For. This is great stuff. It's got Vaginae. It's got Monologs. What's not to love? --Anyone 20:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. OMGWTFROTFLMAOZEDONG11!! Mr T is on a roll!! first Idiot's Guide and now this? (though this one's of a much better quality & also, it's clear that he's NEVER getting laid, ever, and he knows) -- mowgli 17:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Comment ~ Yes. Sad, but true. I even complained about it in one of my recent newscasts. Sadly. ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 05:55, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 17:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Just not getting it. Sorry. --goshzillacorrespondence 10:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Winston 12:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 21:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Let's see -- tonight I've voted for Penis joke and The Vagina Monologues. That about covers the options.--Procopius 00:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

## Henchmen

Score: +15 thugs
• Nom and For; This article's gotten strong reviews at Pee Review, and I loved it, so I decided I'd finally nom it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
• For --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 08:06, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 12:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 01:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• For - winnah! - David Gerard 01:48, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional for - basically solid concept with good jokes, but the graphics don't add much, and it could be cut down and tightened up considerably. InfiniteMonkey 03:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Excellent.-- 08:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• 4. --L 17:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. 15Mickey20 21:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. We need more of this type of article. Just good solid writing, no gimmicks. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. I've always been a minion, myself.-- 08:49, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. Keep the chain going. --goshzilladisgusting unfunny nonsense 04:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 21:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. I liked it better before all the changes by the IP, but at the same time I couldn't write my way out of a urine-soaked paper bag (and I've tried too!) --Anyone 19:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against. A good article in need of savage editing to make it shorter and tighter.--Winston 13:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Now we know about their sorry lives. Swordmaster 21:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Procopius 00:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

# Previously Featured

## HowTo:Smell a Bit Like Fish

Score: +16 inspirational odors

Featuredrc (t) 04:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

• SNom+F Why not. -- 20:53, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
• For everything about it, even the title, has a charming and hilarious quirk to it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 21:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. I'd say I always wanted to know how to smell like a fish, but I haven't, and furthermore; still don't. All the same, good show chap! And damn you Squiggle for conflicting my edit! --Anyone 21:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. Almost makes me want to smell like fish. 15Mickey20 22:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
• For Sheer brilliance. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
• For---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 02:28, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
• For InfiniteMonkey 02:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
• For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 09:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
• For --Leneface 10:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strongest Possible For. Another feature for STM? What else is new? --  Holla | CUN 06:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 12:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. My ladies like me in haddock. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 08:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- 09:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against Not that funny or enjoyable, especially compared to the other options.--MrMetalFLower 10:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
• For Pretty funny. Tanktunker Take heed, this user may or may not be naked and/or insane.
• For. What? I've mounted myself on a wall already! "Don't worry. Be happy. Woo-hoo-hoo...." -- The Colonel (talk) 20:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. Almost -- it's well-written, and I did enjoy the dialogue, but I guess I have a hard time buying into the premise. (Yes, I know how silly that sounds.) Sorry.--Procopius 20:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
• weak Against Well written but lacking--Catch 22 11:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• For ^_^ 18:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against.--Winston 12:57, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For. The title alone was worth it, but I read the whole thing and loved it. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 22:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
• For aquatic body odour - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. --goshzilladisgusting unfunny nonsense 23:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against, I liked the "Benefits of smelling a bit like fish" bit, but the rest...not so much.-- 08:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, tis just plain hilarious. --Zig 16:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Nice. It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 22:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

## HowTo:Make a Band

Score: +16 exploding drummers

Featuredrc (t) 06:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

• For and Nom. A great article by local n00b, Braydie. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 21:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For A bit lengthy but still quite enjoyable.--Gaberou 21:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. via the long road to tweakville. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 21:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• For - Not bad at all - I may be giving it a tweak in a while because being in a band is such a pit of fucked-upness that there's endless uncyclopedic potential documenting the bitching. SPINAL TAP IS REAL - David Gerard 22:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• FOR - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• For - Great article from a new user. -- 00:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• For because I want to be included in the lineup...I can play triangle!--Shandon 22:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. Really great stuff, and earned my NotM vote for sure. --Anyone 20:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• For, even though I'm a low-on-the-totem-pole piano player. Swordmaster 21:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strong for. (Claps hands) herr doktor needsAshuttle  [scream!] 23:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Even stronger for. Good work, Braydie. -- Hindleyite Converse 21:40, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
• For --Kwakerjak 00:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 15:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For I enjoyed writing it, thanks for the input some of you contributed. --—Braydie 09:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, even though because it's unkind to bassists. ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 02:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Thanks to this article, I have formed my own band! Expect us to play in your town never! -- 09:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. This is probably funnier to musicians than to people like myself who use pianos for room decoration..--Winston 12:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

# Archives

 Awards, Decorations and Honours Awards Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Admin Rank · Ninjastars Ranks &Honours Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the moment Potatochopper of the Month Limelight VFH · VFP · Best of · Top Ten: 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · Hall of Shame Prix citron Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year · Sandwich of the Month · FFS Events citron Poo Lit Suprise · Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball · The Article Whisperer Happy Monkey Competition · Other competitions