Revision as of 06:46, December 3, 2006

Shortcut:
UN:VFH

Vote for an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
- Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
- When voting For or Against, please change the score number accordingly—this saves a lot of time later.
- IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
- Nonsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button () above the edit box.
- When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the article using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
Voters: don't be dicks and do be constructive with criticism. Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
Articles from all namespaces (including UnNews, HowTo, UnBooks, etc.) are eligible for VFH. Votes against articles based on namespace prejudice will be discarded.
If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.

THIS IS A VOTE, NOT A DISCUSSION. If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it HERE.

Violators of this policy will be retired.

Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must spend at least one week on pee review before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time and require no review (though it is still recommended).

VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.

VFH IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.

HowTo:Get Laid

N+F It helped me out a lot. Now I'm rollin' in ho's! Prolix 03:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Maddox

N+F. Probably one of the funnier ones I've come accross. --~
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.
03:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Internet Movie Database

Score: +3 movie(s) found. Search again?

N+F. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 20:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
For --—Braydie 20:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
For --Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 04:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Enid Blyton

Score: The Secret One

N & F. I can still remember reading with baited breath when Julian first showed Dick the secret passage. A beautiful moment from my childhood. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 20:34, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Tupac Shakur

Score: +1 Keepin it Thuglife G!

Nom and for. herr doktor needsAcorpse [scream!] 17:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Against-Funny, but beyond the ebonics nothing rings humorous.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 21:29, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

I found the irony about "being real" very redeeming. herr doktor needsAcorpse [scream!] 21:31, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

For and of! Hey, how about the reference to people thinking that things add up to seven means Tupac is alive? You have to read into the article to see the value of it, its not one of these articles like innuendo that directly reflects what its about.

Hubert Horatio Humphrey

Score: 0 delegates sent through tables

Nom&For The article I admit isn't all that laugh out loud funny but the clever puns and cliches make it in my opinion feature quality.--Gaberou 03:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Strong For&Writer Dude thanks wow I can't believe you nominated it that quickly I just made it like yesterday!--Lt. Wyoming 04:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Nah. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 04:31, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Not that funny, but I reward originality and creativity. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 04:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Nyaaaaah Smart and close, but not for VFH yet. Feureau 04:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Weak Against. It's very close. One more rewrite. I would suggest focusing the article entirely on his wrestling career.--Procopius 13:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For, if for no other reason than: Lt. Wyoming made this? Damn! Compare this to his earlier work, Rapper's Bible, and you'll see that this is infinitely better. He's making a lot of progress with his writing. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 07:20, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

New Hampshire Merchant Cat

Score: +7 racist litter boxes

Self-nom and For. I've liked this for a long time, and no one on Pee Review seemed to hate it, so, um, there's a peek into my subconscious.--Procopius 16:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For --—Braydie 16:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For, ^_^ 17:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For So randomly funny --Gaberou 22:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For cat satire. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For pretty kitty cats! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 19:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard 01:16, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Dear John letter

Score: +13 versions enjoyed

Nom and For. Ninety seven hilarious articles for the price of one. Highly original. Technically accomplished. Fun to edit. Kind to children. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 06:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For Wasn't sure, but the second last paragraph sold me. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For a new humourous letter with every pageload. ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 11:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For- I make it $9.35251 {{\times 10^{{19}}}}$ articles for the price of one. --Sir Jam 11:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
4 - Oh, that is fuckin' clever! Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 11:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For --Zyrac 20:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Against too close to reality for my taste. Been getting letters like that for the past 18 years. I co-operated with authorities, and still...No -- di Mario 20:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Wow, for. -- Hindleyite Converse 20:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For --gosh zillacorrespondence 00:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Against' -- Oh, ye Gads!!! Anyway, it's too short for an article, too long for a dear john letter. At least to me. Feureau 04:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Clarification ~ Actually, it's as long as several of its competitors combined: 15:04, 12 November 2006 ‎Dear John letter (hist) ‎[16,775 bytes] ‎Todd Lyons ~ but the content is random. It's meant to be re-loaded and re-read several dozen (97?) times. :) ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 05:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Strong for. This article screams ~~at that heartless bitch~~ to be on the front page.--Procopius 13:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For --—Braydie 13:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For Brilliant idea brilliantly executed. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:43, 1 December 2006
Five it's like a For but one integer more emphatic.Nullius in Verba 19:37, 2 December 2006 (UTC) (UTC)
For; I love this article. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Tapler

Score: +5 portmanteaus of Stapler and Tape.

Self Nom ~~for now~~; This has sat in Pee for the past week. Wrote it a long time ago. Curious how well this would do in the hostile VFH environment. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

... and For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 07:17, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

For --—Braydie 16:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For! Utterly brilliant. I hesitate to think what the author would make of the combination 'toilet to releave oneself in' and 'toilet to throw up in'. One receptacle, different sources. Tricky! -- di Mario 20:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For, ^_^ 01:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For I think it's really quite clever. --The Acceptable Cainad (Fnord) 03:25, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

n00bl3ss3 0bl1ghey

Score: +5 INSERT PITHY REMARK

N&4 Dwaaa! Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 10:04, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

whFore and Comment more out of fear and surprise than anything else. Billy Dee! Berogen^VFH 02:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Now with added Sophistine^TM
For. It could probably use a format touchup, things like an introductory paragraph and such, but it's cute. --monika 03:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For Agreed it could use a little work; but very funny already. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
D'accorde alzough zhat loekes suspicionally vraiment comment le Saississon d'Roisette, vous Rascallion! -- di Mario 20:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

The Critique of Pure Reason

Score: +5 ontological proofs of the article's excellence

Nominating and for. Let's prove that we are not just a bunch of jesters, but a bunch of damn smart jesters. herr doktor needsAcorpse [scream!] 19:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Four and second. I contributed a very small part, which I personally think is the most brilliant piece of controversy mankind has ever seen since the invention of Divorce by King Henry VIII. -- di Mario 19:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
For I really enjoy voting for myself. Really. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Strong For. Wait -- does the VFH page exist or has my mind projected its experience onto it?--Procopius 13:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
4 1337! But seriously, on a cerebral plain I think I contributed some Deep Thought to this article. -- di Mario 17:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
For "If man cannot vote thrice, then man cannot vote at all" - Ludwig von Wittgenstein. -- di Mario 17:50, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

U.S. Presidential Election, 1948

Score: +6 pathetic re-election campaigns

Self-nomination, and affrimative vote. Yep, I did another one. Let it sit in Pee Review for a week, too. --Kwakerjak 18:22, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
For, which I hope isn't the kiss of death...I found it funny--Shandon 22:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
For. USS Dewey Kicks Ass. And also obscure links. These are what make an article great. --Anyone 21:32, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Wait, didn't I already vote for this one? I could've SWORN I did...--<<>> 23:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
For I never realised just hoe hilarious American elections are. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I've been watching this one for awhile.--Procopius 13:41, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Make a Band

Score: +16 exploding drummers

For and Nom. A great article by local n00b, Braydie. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 21:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Weak For A bit lengthy but still quite enjoyable.--Gaberou 21:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For. via the long road to tweakville. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 21:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For - Not bad at all - I may be giving it a tweak in a while because being in a band is such a pit of fucked-upness that there's endless uncyclopedic potential documenting the bitching. SPINAL TAP IS REAL - David Gerard 22:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
FOR - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For - Great article from a new user. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 00:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
For because I want to be included in the lineup...I can play triangle!--Shandon 22:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Really great stuff, and earned my NotM vote for sure. --Anyone 20:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
For, even though I'm a low-on-the-totem-pole piano player. Swordmaster 21:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Strong for. (Claps hands) herr doktor needsAcorpse [scream!] 23:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Even stronger for. Good work, Braydie. -- Hindleyite Converse 21:40, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
For --Kwakerjak 00:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For, ^_^ 15:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For I enjoyed writing it, thanks for the input some of you contributed. --—Braydie 09:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For, ~~even though~~ because it's unkind to bassists. ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 02:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

The Vagina Monologues

Score: +13 genitalia that won't shut the hell up

Nomination and For because puns rock. -- Hindleyite Converse 20:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
For Literalism strikes again. Fucking unions. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:14, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
For --monika 22:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
For The later half redeems. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Heh. I felt like I needed to build some foundation before the payload delivery, but I'm sure the intro could be tightened up. :) ~ Major Sir Todd Lyons GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC 17:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

For. I put a lot of thought into this, but welcome any additions or edits to make it better. ~ Major Sir Todd Lyons GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC 16:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For, obviously. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 14:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Foreplay -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 14:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
For...Todd's got culture, all of the sudden...--Shandon 22:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
For...lots of culture...--Kevin Bell 02:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Strong For. This is great stuff. It's got Vaginae. It's got Monologs. What's not to love? --Anyone 20:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
For. OMGWTFROTFLMAOZEDONG11!! Mr T is on a roll!! first Idiot's Guide and now this? (though this one's of a much better quality & also, it's clear that he's NEVER getting laid, ever, and he knows) -- mowgli 17:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment ~ Yes. Sad, but true. I even complained about it in one of my recent newscasts. Sadly. ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 05:55, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

For, ^_^ 17:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Henchmen

Score: +14 thugs

Nom and For; This article's gotten strong reviews at Pee Review, and I loved it, so I decided I'd finally nom it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
For --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 08:06, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 12:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Strong For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 01:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
For - winnah! - David Gerard 01:48, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Conditional for - basically solid concept with good jokes, but the graphics don't add much, and it could be cut down and tightened up considerably. InfiniteMonkey 03:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Excellent.-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 08:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
4. --L 17:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
For. 15Mickey20 21:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
For. We need more of this type of article. Just good solid writing, no gimmicks. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I've always been a minion, myself.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 08:49, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
For. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Keep the chain going. --gosh zill adisgusting unfunny nonsense 04:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For, ^_^ 21:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Weak For. I liked it better before all the changes by the IP, but at the same time I couldn't write my way out of a urine-soaked paper bag (and I've tried too!) --Anyone 19:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Fundagelical Christianity

Score: +17 fruitless attempts at intercourse

Nom and for. So it's like this. I was clicking on the random page button and I happened to come across this delightful little wonder which, in my opinion, is quite a nice read. I liked it so much that I decided to nominate it. --General Insineratehymn 22:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
For. A favourite of mine (who woulda thought, a fave of the user with the fundie fixation...).--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
For Man I'm such a whore. Such a sexy, sexy, whore. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Johnleemk 10:11, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I need to write this sort of thing some time - David Gerard 13:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
4. --L 14:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 17:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
For. 15Mickey20 22:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Weak Against. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 00:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
For-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 19:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
FOR - jack mort | cunt | talk - 01:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
For; the reason this article is so amazing is because it doesn't just satire Fundamental Christianity, but it also skewers the stupidity of the guy narrating it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
For--Enigma16
For--Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Against Rambling and not encyclopedic at all. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
For InfiniteMonkey 08:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For, ^_^ 21:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I likes it. --Anyone 19:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 04:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Very clever and original.--Procopius 20:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For. I liked the "seventh grade composition" style. herr doktor needsAcorpse [scream!] 21:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Googlewhack

Score: +18 times caught googlewhacking by your parents

Nom & for - If you vote for it, I promise you'll never have to look at it again. I promise. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 00:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Now remember — you've promised. ~ T. (talk) 00:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
For As soon as I hit submit, I'm clicking that link again just to see if you're right emc! --Sir Z o m b i e b a ro n 01:52, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
For, only if EMC keeps his word. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 22:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
For Great article, but a disturbing image 0_o. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
"Uncyclopedia Admin votes Against another quality article at VFH," but that was predictable in this case.--<<>> 00:55, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Nope. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 03:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
For. The Ed. notes make it great. Goshzilla 12:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Against. What was I thinking?. Goshzilla 01:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC) Old/duplicate votes. ~ Major Sir Todd Lyons GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC 23:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  - Weak for. I read the WP article, and the Dave Gorman references are mildly funny now. Also, Mhaille did some Republican-esque lobbying. Unsigned vote. Please fix this, Goshzilla, and quit changing your mind. ~ Major Sir Todd Lyons GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC 23:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
    - Weak for. As per right above. Sorry I forgot to sign before. --Goshzilla 00:31, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
For. You sick bastard. --Anyone 20:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
For for reasons I can't remember now...RWG 01:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Against, even though when I think about you, I touch myself.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:58, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Against. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 16:30, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 19:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Pour Idiot over me forgot to use the * thing, what a loser, hehe, hehehehe, hehehhehe... NeoZidane CUNT Headbutt extraordinaire

______соединяйтесь!

For. Dave Gorman can feck off. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
For. We've all Googlewhacked at least once or twice, I figure. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
For. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 10:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
For, Captain Obvious paid a visit. 18:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
For - First, I love masturbation. Second, He did not have to whore his votes because he is just so loveable. --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 23:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I even whore other people's articles now - David Gerard 00:17, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Against I will not be assimilated, and it's got room for improvement. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 08:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Even though it's all one long masturbation joke, as Mr. Mhaille points out. And I will not be beaten at article whoring. -- Hindleyite Converse 21:25, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
For. *whacks* - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
For. --Guido Arbia 19:15, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Against Please, please, please don't put any of those pictures on the front page. PLEASE. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 16:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
For -- The pictures are the best part....uh, no, you didn't hear me say that! --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 19:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
For --—Braydie 16:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For Why the hell not--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 00:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
For Nice image, too funny article. It's gne om I 13:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
For We didn't start the fire It was always burning Since the world's been turning... Sliferjam ~ This is my new signature. Cool huh? 00:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Against I didn't like this at all, especially those pictures Prolix 03:58, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Smell a Bit Like Fish

Score: +15.5 inspirational odors

SNom+F Why not. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 20:53, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
For everything about it, even the title, has a charming and hilarious quirk to it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 21:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I'd say I always wanted to know how to smell like a fish, but I haven't, and furthermore; still don't. All the same, good show chap! And damn you Squiggle for conflicting my edit! --Anyone 21:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Almost makes me want to smell like fish. 15Mickey20 22:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
For Sheer brilliance. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
For---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 02:28, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
For InfiniteMonkey 02:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 09:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
For --Leneface 10:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Strongest Possible For. Another feature for STM? What else is new? -- Sir C Holla | CUN 06:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard 12:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
For. My ladies like me in haddock. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 08:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
For. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 09:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Against Not that funny or enjoyable, especially compared to the other options.--MrMetalFLower 10:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For Pretty funny. Tanktunker Take heed, this user may or may not be naked and/or insane.
For. What? I've mounted myself on a wall already! "Don't worry. Be happy. Woo-hoo-hoo...." -- The Colonel (talk) 20:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Weak against. Almost -- it's well-written, and I did enjoy the dialogue, but I guess I have a hard time buying into the premise. (Yes, I know how silly that sounds.) Sorry.--Procopius 20:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
weak Against Well written but lacking--Catch 22 11:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For ^_^ 18:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Weak Against.--Winston 12:57, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Strong For. The title alone was worth it, but I read the whole thing and loved it. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 22:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
For aquatic body odour - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
For. --gosh zill adisgusting unfunny nonsense 23:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Against, I liked the "Benefits of smelling a bit like fish" bit, but the rest...not so much.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 08:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Previously Featured

Life's Unanswerable Questions

Score: +19 unanswerable questions

Featured —rc (t) 08:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Nom and For. Accessible, clever and LOL - David Gerard 14:31, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
One must first contemplate the options. If pushed, I would say yes, but then I was the author. -- Hindleyite 14:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
for, still room for expansion though - jack mort | cunt | talk - 15:10, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Mild against. It feels like it's missing something somewhere.--Winston 15:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Well, one thing it's missing is the "Overly British" template. Either that, or section for the unanswerable question "What the fuck is so great about EastEnders that the Brits won't shut up about it?" --Kwakerjak 22:20, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Just answered for you - David Gerard 08:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Well done. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 00:05, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For Wow that's hilarious! Lt. Wyoming 08:01, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
For A towering work of the human intellect. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Against. Looks like it's been edited by like 10 people, none of whom are sure what they want to write about. This subject could be done a lot better if it were more coherent. --So So 01:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For 04:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Against, either this is too British, or it just isn't for me. Either way, I didn't really laugh.--<<>> 15:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Weak For. Hard to understand at times due to it's overly Britishness. Then again, any British at all is overly British. You guys put the UK in Fcuk! Still good though even though I don't get all of it, because I was born in the US and A like God intended. --Anyone 21:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Hilariously enough, this external link is actually funnier than the article itself. Also, Abstain. --L 06:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Against as per Bradphraser, mostly.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
For. And a general request: please, for the love of god, stop writing LOL!!! I'm feeling like we're becoming ED. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 15:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
For. LOL. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 09:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

You Bastard...-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 14:44, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Yah! Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 13:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
For. It's British, but I have PBS. And the Guardian on my web browser. As for Eastenders, the appeal is lost on me, but I'm sure the English find Americans' love of Seinfeld baffling.--Procopius 20:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For. lawl. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 22:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For - Death and God! --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Even if it is overly British (which would be immaterial to me anyway), the "Did you threaten to overrule him?" reference makes it completely worthwile alone. --Sir Jam 11:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
For the whore I ~~adore~~ greatly admire. ~ T. (talk) 21:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Hani 18:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
For Philosophy=good. British humour=good. Hindleyite's wiriting=good.--The One and Only Czar Yah 22:56, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
For All too close to the truth, and that makes it brilliant.--Sayle 20:15, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Hindleyite hit gold. --gosh zill adisgusting unfunny nonsense 04:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For —Braydie 18:11, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

@@ Line 125: / Line 125: @@
 *'''For'''.  I've been watching this one for awhile.--[[User:Procopius|Procopius]] 13:41, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
-==[[UnBooks:Parkhurst Pete's World of Wonders]]==
-{{s|+7 to life}}
-*'''Nom/For''' - another one to achieve nomination by making me laugh out loud. <small>I'm still wondering how to pronounce the asterisk in "c*nt", though</small> - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] 22:21, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''Strong For''' I was just about the nom this myself.  Read it when it was under construction and it just killed me. --{{User:ENeGMA/sig}} 22:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''FOR''' {{User:Jack_mort/sig}} 22:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''For''', I voted for it on [[UnBooks:Vote_for_Featured_UnBook|Vote for Featured UnBook]] too, so I've got deja vu something wicked.--{{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 01:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''For'''. That winnie the pooh part is hil-c*nting-arious. --[[User:Anyone|Anyone]] 21:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''Strongest conceivable for'''; Hardwick. You have written one of the funniest articles I have read in my days here. And you did it for free. I feel like I should pay you. But I won't. {{User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig}} 04:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''For''' Wonderful, offbeat article. --{{User:Cap'n Ben/sig}} 10:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 == [[HowTo:Make a Band]] ==
@@ Line 172: / Line 163: @@
 *'''For''', ^_^ {{User:Tom_mayfair/sig}} 17:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
-==[[001]]==
-{{s|+16 pellets}}
-*'''Nom and for'''. I cackled like a loon. Curse you, Fundlebuggy! - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] 13:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''004'''. --[[User:Zork Implementor L|L]] 17:29, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''For''' - after the first sentence. --[[User:Nydas|Nydas]] 18:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''For'''. [[User:15Mickey20|15Mickey20]] 21:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''For''' Deeply weird.--{{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 03:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''For''' Amazing!--[[User:Mr. Bob|Mr. Bob]] 04:42, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''For''' daft, and that's a good thing.--{{User:No, yuo/sig}} 13:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
-*What?  It's Fundlebuggy?  Fine, give me the stamp -- '''For'''.  No need to dilly-dally.  (I did read it and found it very funny.)--[[User:Procopius|Procopius]] 13:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''Against''' Sorry Hardwick, but I just didn't feel the magic on this one. --{{User:ENeGMA/sig}} 15:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''For''' God I hate when it becomes about the author...I like the article and that is all. --{{User:Zombiebaron/sig3}} 03:30, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''For''' God I hate when it becomes about the author...I like the article and that is all. Though I must say, the author is a smashing person, who is kind to animals and loves his country, and nearly all the charges against him have been dropped now, so he'll probably be out in ten years for good behaviour. {{User:Hardwick_Fundlebuggy/sig}} 09:05, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''For'''; extremely original. {{User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig}} 21:34, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''For'''.  I like.--{{User:Bradaphraser/sig}} 20:21, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''For'''. Nice, odd article. --{{User:Cap'n Ben/sig}} 03:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''For'''. I walked into this article not having the slightest idea what it would be about. Numbers? Sequences? Arithmatic? Well played Hardwick, well played indeed. --[[User:Anyone|Anyone]] 20:02, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
-*The name's '''for''', erm, just for. -- {{User:Hindleyite/sig}} 21:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''For.''' Strangely beautiful. ~ {{User:Todd_Lyons/sig3}} 21:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''For.''' The more I read, the more I liked.  --[[User:LORD V4DER|LORD V4DER]] 23:55, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
-*'''For'''[[User:Prolix|Prolix]] 03:56, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 ==[[Henchmen]]==

Awards, Decorations and Honours
	Awards	Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Admin Rank · Ninjastars
	Ranks & Honours	Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the moment Potatochopper of the Month Foolitzer Prize Writer of the Year · Uncyclopedian of the Year · RadicalX of the Year RYA · User Space Affiliations · Past Winners
	Limelight	VFH · VFP · Best of · Top Ten: 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · Hall of Shame
	Prix citron	Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year · Sandwich of the Month · FFS
	Events citron	Poo Lit Suprise · Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball · The Article Whisperer Happy Monkey Competition · Other competitions

Contents

Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

HowTo:Get Laid

Maddox

Internet Movie Database

Enid Blyton

Tupac Shakur

Hubert Horatio Humphrey

New Hampshire Merchant Cat

Dear John letter

Tapler

n00bl3ss3 0bl1ghey

The Critique of Pure Reason

U.S. Presidential Election, 1948

HowTo:Make a Band

The Vagina Monologues

Henchmen

Fundagelical Christianity

Googlewhack

HowTo:Smell a Bit Like Fish

Previously Featured

Life's Unanswerable Questions

Archives

Uncyclopedia:VFH/old

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 06:46, December 3, 2006

Contents

Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

Previously Featured

Archives

Views

Personal tools

Navigation

Search

Community

Participate

Toolbox

projects