Uncyclopedia:VFH/old

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:VFH(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 267: Line 267:
   
 
==[[Life's Unanswerable Questions]]==
 
==[[Life's Unanswerable Questions]]==
{{s|+12 unanswerable questions}}
+
{{s|+13 unanswerable questions}}
 
*'''Nom and For'''. Accessible, clever and LOL - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] 14:31, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Nom and For'''. Accessible, clever and LOL - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] 14:31, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 
*One must first contemplate the options. If pushed, I would say '''yes''', but then I was the author. -- [[User:Hindleyite|Hindleyite]] 14:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 
*One must first contemplate the options. If pushed, I would say '''yes''', but then I was the author. -- [[User:Hindleyite|Hindleyite]] 14:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Line 292: Line 292:
 
*'''For''' - Death and God! --[[User:PrincessCaitlai|<font style="background: pink" face="Courier" color="#FFFFFF">”'&nbsp;PrincessCaitlai&nbsp;”'</font>]] <small>([[User talk:PrincessCaitlai|<font color="pink">”'T”'</font>]])</small> 01:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''For''' - Death and God! --[[User:PrincessCaitlai|<font style="background: pink" face="Courier" color="#FFFFFF">”'&nbsp;PrincessCaitlai&nbsp;”'</font>]] <small>([[User talk:PrincessCaitlai|<font color="pink">”'T”'</font>]])</small> 01:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''For'''. Even if it is overly British (which would be immaterial to me anyway), the "Did you threaten to overrule him?" reference makes it completely worthwile alone. --{{User:Jamtrousers/Sig}} 11:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''For'''. Even if it is overly British (which would be immaterial to me anyway), the "Did you threaten to overrule him?" reference makes it completely worthwile alone. --{{User:Jamtrousers/Sig}} 11:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  +
*'''For''' the [[Whore: A Retrospective|whore]] I <s>adore</s> greatly admire. ~ {{User:Todd_Lyons/sig}} 21:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
   
 
==[[U.S. Presidential Election, 1960]]==
 
==[[U.S. Presidential Election, 1960]]==

Revision as of 21:04, November 14, 2006

  • Vote for an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
    • Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
    • When voting For or Against, please change the score number accordingly—this saves a lot of time later.
    • IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
    • Nonsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button (Button sig) above the edit box.
    • When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the article using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
  • Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
  • Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
  • Voters: don't be dicks and do be constructive with criticism. Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
  • Articles from all namespaces (including UnNews, HowTo, UnBooks, etc.) are eligible for VFH. Votes against articles based on namespace prejudice will be discarded.
  • If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
THIS IS A VOTE, NOT A DISCUSSION. If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it HERE.
Violators of this policy will be regurgitated.



Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must spend at least one week on pee review before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time and require no review (though it is still recommended).

VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.

VFH IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.


The Free World

Score: +2
  • Nomination & For. I love a bit of economic satire, and Fred MacMurray, and Hardwick delivers both with this one. ~ T. (talk) 18:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, of course, considering a large chunk of this was written by me. But Hardwick spruced it up and annahilated the crud. -- Hindleyite Converse 20:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Course Adjustment Knob

Score: 0 Historical Incidents
  • SN and For. I don't know if it will do as bad as xPod did, but seeing that it's written quite better I thought of giving it a shot. --~ Tophatsig 00:13, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Nah. Not bad, just not good enough for a feature. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 03:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, it could use some more pictures and pretty formatting. It's a pretty regular article though, when it comes to funny. --Sir Zombiebaron 03:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Lemony Snicket

Score: +4 Users who tearfully regret having read this article
  • Recent rewrite by Squiggle, and it's funny even if you haven't read ASoUE. Nom and For, although it would be funnier if it were nommed for VFD. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 03:58, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • A depressing, putrid For. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against. (I have not read the series)--Winston 12:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Which here means "I show approval of this article"--Witt, Union leader of Union member UNion Entertain me* 14:06, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --~ Tophatsig 21:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Which here means "I am a pompus balloon." --Sir Zombiebaron 23:56, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Saw this under construction and liked it then. For. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 00:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against I've not read the books, but I'm familiar with the writing style...and I find it annoying. It's not a bad article, but it's not an article I enjoyed reading. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Still for him for WOTM though. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 03:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR Nice! (and he paid me off in IRC~ :b --CchristianTehWazzit 04:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, which in this context means "Not totally opposed to, since it wasn't a bad article at all but left me feeling empty, not unlike a warm apple pie that you want to eat so badly and you find out that it's not for you but for your mother's neighbor." A definite support. ~ PHDrillSergeant...§ 04:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Googlewhack

Score: +5
  • Nom & for - If you vote for it, I promise you'll never have to look at it again. I promise. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Now remember — you've promised. ~ T. (talk) 00:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For As soon as I hit submit, I'm clicking that link again just to see if you're right emc! --Sir Zombiebaron 01:52, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, only if EMC keeps his word. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 22:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Great article, but a disturbing image 0_o. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • "Uncyclopedia Admin votes Against another quality article at VFH," but that was predictable in this case.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 00:55, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Nope. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 03:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The Ed. notes make it great. Goshzilla 12:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. You sick bastard. --Anyone 20:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Dictation

Score: +1
Nominate & For Rather amusing! --Mrs-Bertram-Keg-water 13:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC) Sockpuppet. ~ T. (talk) 13:33, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, Briliant. --Vosnul 15:51, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, Stunning. --SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 20:18, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, Amazing. --Winstanley1 20:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
* For, Splendid --BAN:THIS:FILTH! 00:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC) Sockpuppet. ~ T. (talk) 13:33, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. This failed to amuse me even slightly. Predictable and I didnt laugh. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 03:05, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, Outrageous --Witt, Union leader of Union member UNion Entertain me* 04:14, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Everything Cornbread said, and also its spelling is horrible, unless that's a politically incorrect statement about female writers, which wouldn't be funny anyway.

--Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 04:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

*Comment I think you're missing the point here, it's suppossed to be a satire on how stupid the (male) person who's dictating is. --BAN:THIS:FILTH! 09:57, 13 November 2006 (UTC) Sockpuppet. ~ T. (talk) 13:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against. --L 06:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Highly amusing, innovative, unpredictable and slightly dangerous. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 12:33, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against.--Winston 12:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
* For amusing satire. --The meddling monk 13:03, 13 November 2006 (UTC) Sockpuppet. ~ T. (talk) 13:33, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Good, but not quite VFH... yet. I'd say that it certainly has potential. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Creative and funny. Good stuff. --Anyone 20:00, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Lee Harvey Oswald

Score: -1

Nominate & For This article is the sexx0rz. Marblefluss 01:45, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Against Funny in places, but too random. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 05:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Concur with Cap'n--Winston 12:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Pronounce Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

Score: 2 Infidel dogs love the great president
Comment - Why you little Cuban @%@%@!!!%@#% *sighs* Sorry about that, forget to take my meds. Still love you. Yo te lavyo. Or something. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 21:22, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
I Googled "how to pronounce Che Guevara". I've always wondered if I was saying it wrong. Turns out I haven't. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 02:06, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Whore

Score: 2 satisfied customers
Only in nickels and dimes. :) ~ T. (talk) 18:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
To my surprise, this page now exists. As a man of my word, for. Vandalism's funnier if it's retrospected. :)--Procopius 19:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

East Timor

Score: +4
  • SN+F. Well, with Timor L'Este back in the news, let's see if this sinks like a barium turd... -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 08:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Nothings changed since last time. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 08:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Um... I don't think it was ever VFH-ed, though I did put it in for the PLS (where it was beaten by better stuff). And at least three people have added to it since. Still, feel free to hate it. -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 08:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I like it.--Procopius 13:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Go bananas. -- The Colonel (talk) 19:27, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 04:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Johnleemk 15:43, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For. It's not great, but I think it's good enough to VFH. --Anyone 20:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

The Uncyclopedian's Song

Score: +21 models of a good Uncyclopedian
  • Nom and Strong For; This truly took effort, and now has Audio. Nothing is cooler than this. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes --Zyrac 20:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Anyone 20:38, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For but lose the chorus. SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 20:40, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It's an in joke - but it's a charm in joke. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 21:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - A great tune. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Nicely done. ~ T. (talk) 21:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against this should be in UnTunes! (kidding!) This is the best song I've heard on Uncyc all day, For.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Fur - Aw, shucks!   Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN  Eh?  Oh!  UnTunes! CannabagreenI Card-hearts-up my cat! 23:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Funniest. Thing. Ever. -- Paw_print.jpg 00:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The audio seals it. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Against. Stupid, Short, Injokey, CRAP. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 05:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Lots of hard work went into this :] Troll is a jolly fellow. --Toratoritore 06:52, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Catchy tune, with cool lyrics. ---- Codestream (07:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC))
  • God fucking dammit no, you assholes. Stop nominating in jokes already. InfiniteMonkey 07:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Very clever and funny, but I for one don't wanna see in-jokes on the front. I appreciate the fact that a lot of work went into it, but as any ditch digger will tell you, hard yakka don't equal massive public recognition... -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 08:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For. It's very well-done. It's an in-joke, which holds me from a full for, but it's more general than most. Outsiders could appreciate this.--Procopius 13:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Sweet jesus, I am ever so much against in-jokes, and I wouldn't even hesitate to vote against one... But this one is too damn good... It's not even an in-joke as much as it is an informative song about the site... Heck, THIS ISN'T AN IN-JOKE, PEOPLE! Big fat FOR!!! ⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 18:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Sheer briliance, but the chorus parts seemed a bit fuzzy. But what do I know, I've only been playing music for 6 years.--The Jeff Killer 18:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Againstimpenetrable in joke.--Sir Bungle 19:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Ok, you do have audio with it! I love music! --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For I totally love it. I've heard a different song to this same tune, and just imagining somebody actually singing it cracks me up. --The Acceptable Thinking cap small Cainad Sacred Chao (Fnord) 01:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Very, very reluctant against. I'd be happy to vote for Tooltroll for WotM purely on the basis of this one article (in fact, I tink I'll go nominate him, if no one else has). But it's an in-joke, and I really don't think in-jokes should be highlighted. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 05:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Anyone who'll even attempt to sing a Gilbert & Sullivan parody deserved a feature, especially given the work that went into it. Yes, it's an in-joke, but it's that's not the point. It's funny.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Very weak for and I'll tell ya why... I really do love this. The audio is amazing. I also love in-jokes. But I do think this needs at least some expansion to resemble an article instead of just the song lyrics. Some story of the song's conception or the like. Still, I cannot vote against such fine work, and the very weak is merely ornamental. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 15:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Alksub 22:22, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • ForLoving the audio. Kudos--Witt, Union leader of Union member UNion Entertain me* 07:12, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For BEST SONG EVER. --Kingkitty 08:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For The amount of work that went into this injoke allows it to deserve my blessing. --Sir Zombiebaron 23:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Confession (Catholicism)

Score: +11 Hail Marys
  • Nominate and For.--Winstanley1 15:01, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For-As a catholic I find this to be quite entertaining.--Gaberou 00:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Fucking hilarious.--Emmzee 02:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Surprisingly For. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 06:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Abstain Well-written in general, but not terribly funny or particularly original, in my opinion. ---- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 07:19, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Upon further consideration, Weak Against. Sorry. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 07:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: Got out? Once a Catholic, always a Catholic, brother. --UtarEmpire 10:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
La la la la la I can't hear you -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 10:31, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Oh yeah, being Catholic is great. You get the Jewish guilt without the Protestant work ethic.

-- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 10:31, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Hey! Maybe we should convert you and call you Sir Armandel Levy Icons-flag-au -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 21:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Hmmm... I'll get to upend all those spunky, gun-toting Daughters of Abraham, right? And I get to stay, um, intact? -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 10:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For flour-sacks of cocaine. --Anyone 16:27, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I liked it so much I helped out with it. And it's all true! -- Hindleyite 18:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
*For HA HA HA HA HA HA --Mrs-Bertram-Keg-water 20:43, 9 November 2006 (UTC) Sockpuppet. ~ T. (talk) 13:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
*For made me laugh. --BAN:THIS:FILTH! 10:50, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Sockpuppet. ~ T. (talk) 13:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
*For--GCWINN 14:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Sockpuppet. ~ T. (talk) 13:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Sticks way too close to the facts. Not that Confession isn't an absurd and possibly hilarious topic to write an article about, but this just seems to not really say anything. It's very topical, I guess. I don't know, I just didn't enjoy it much. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Not so much for the article, but for the pictures (for some reason; don't ask). --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 04:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against per Squiggle. Well-written, but only the captions amused me.--Procopius 13:42, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: This has been heavily re-written if anyone wants to reconsider their vote.--Winstanley1 17:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Sir Bungle 18:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Pissed Myself. Ooops.--The velcrow THING 19:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 04:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Catch 22 11:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For--Billybobjoel 13:15, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against.--Winston 12:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
*For. --The meddling monk 13:05, 13 November 2006 (UTC) Sockpuppet. ~ T. (talk) 13:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Smell a Bit Like Fish

Score: +13.5 inspirational odors
  • SNom+F Why not. -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 20:53, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For everything about it, even the title, has a charming and hilarious quirk to it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 21:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I'd say I always wanted to know how to smell like a fish, but I haven't, and furthermore; still don't. All the same, good show chap! And damn you Squiggle for conflicting my edit! --Anyone 21:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Almost makes me want to smell like fish. 15Mickey20 22:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Sheer brilliance. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 02:28, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For InfiniteMonkey 02:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 09:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Leneface 10:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strongest Possible For. Another feature for STM? What else is new? -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 06:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - David Gerard 12:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. My ladies like me in haddock. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 08:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 09:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Not that funny or enjoyable, especially compared to the other options.--MrMetalFLower 10:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Pretty funny. Tanktunker30px-Sucrose_b.gif Take heed, this user may or may not be naked and/or insane.
  • For. What? I've mounted myself on a wall already! "Don't worry. Be happy. Woo-hoo-hoo...." -- The Colonel (talk) 20:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against. Almost -- it's well-written, and I did enjoy the dialogue, but I guess I have a hard time buying into the premise. (Yes, I know how silly that sounds.) Sorry.--Procopius 20:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • weak Against Well written but lacking--Catch 22 11:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For ^_^ SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 18:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Against.--Winston 12:57, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Be a hipster

Score: +9 copies of Joy Division's third album

Just Self-nom for now. I put this sucker on Pee Review a while ago and forgot about it, and I still think the article's funny, but I'm holding off on actually voting until I'm certain that I'm not deluding myself. --Kwakerjak 05:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

  • For - it's a good one. Also entirely comprehensible to a UK audience - like everything in pop music, the UK invented these people - David Gerard 08:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For because, by most standards, I am one, and it's bloody hilarious. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 21:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, because it is a hilarious satire of the silly culture which I am part of. Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) Icons-flag-ie-Icons-flag-us KUN SEXY WH 23:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Okay, so apparently it is good. For. --Kwakerjak 23:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For It's just what Kurt would have wanted. --Sir Zombiebaron 23:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 06:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against. Good, but feels like stuff that's been done before. --Anyone 15:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • As a fan who has purchased Belle & Sebastian, Gil Scott-Heron, and Sigur Rós CDs I am obliged to vote for. Also, it's what Kurt would have wanted. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 08:45, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Fucking hipsters... man I wish I was that cool. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 05:38, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. There was a time when Everclear was considered a hip band. No, seriously.--Procopius 13:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Nice.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 03:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Total Fucking Asshole Server 2006

Score: +14 staplers ruthlessly stolen
  • Nom and strong for. Totally fucking hilarious.--Procopius 00:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For This "ENeMA" is a very funny and strange character. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:02, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Very funny Prolix 02:45, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 03:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 04:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 04:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Aye ---no, yuo Tanks-12px chat 10:17, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. One cool thing about this article is that it looks heaps like the joke I made on IRC when I was banned as a misconfigured human proxy. The first two paragraphs are excellent, but the rest just doesn't cut it. -- The Colonel (talk) 10:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
I got the idea off of an IRC discussion. I may have stolen it from you. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 19:55, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - anyone who's used Windows will understand this is just the next logical step - David Gerard 11:45, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I actually think the first 2 paragraphs arn't that great, but the rest is awesome, especially the dialogues. --Anyone 21:43, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I think one of these handles my email. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 09:08, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I give this Fucking Asshole System a For (oh for). --UtarEmpire 11:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I like expletives and the featured articles page is sorely lacking in them. Fuck, fuck, fuck.-- Imrealized ...hmm? 09:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For.InfiniteMonkey 09:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I made a grave mistake - I read it during a business meeting and nearly collapsed laughing. For. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 14:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Super stuff. -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 07:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, the talk between the servers is hilarious. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 09:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against.--Winston 12:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I like. Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 23:49, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For "Your paper is significantly lacking in ethnic slurs. I'll go right on ahead and add some for you, kike." What more can one man say? -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Life's Unanswerable Questions

Score: +13 unanswerable questions
  • Nom and For. Accessible, clever and LOL - David Gerard 14:31, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • One must first contemplate the options. If pushed, I would say yes, but then I was the author. -- Hindleyite 14:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • for, still room for expansion though - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 15:10, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Mild against. It feels like it's missing something somewhere.--Winston 15:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
    Well, one thing it's missing is the "Overly British" template. Either that, or section for the unanswerable question "What the fuck is so great about EastEnders that the Brits won't shut up about it?" --Kwakerjak 22:20, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
    Just answered for you - David Gerard 08:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Well done. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 00:05, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Wow that's hilarious! Lt. Wyoming 08:01, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For A towering work of the human intellect. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Looks like it's been edited by like 10 people, none of whom are sure what they want to write about. This subject could be done a lot better if it were more coherent. --So So 01:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 04:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, either this is too British, or it just isn't for me. Either way, I didn't really laugh.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 15:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For. Hard to understand at times due to it's overly Britishness. Then again, any British at all is overly British. You guys put the UK in Fcuk! Still good though even though I don't get all of it, because I was born in the US and A like God intended. --Anyone 21:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Hilariously enough, this external link is actually funnier than the article itself. Also, Abstain. --L 06:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against as per Bradphraser, mostly.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. And a general request: please, for the love of god, stop writing LOL!!! I'm feeling like we're becoming ED. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 15:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. LOL. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 09:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Yah!   Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN  Eh?  Oh!  UnTunes! CannabagreenI Card-hearts-up my cat! 13:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It's British, but I have PBS. And the Guardian on my web browser. As for Eastenders, the appeal is lost on me, but I'm sure the English find Americans' love of Seinfeld baffling.--Procopius 20:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. lawl. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Death and God! --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Even if it is overly British (which would be immaterial to me anyway), the "Did you threaten to overrule him?" reference makes it completely worthwile alone. --Sir Jam 11:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For the whore I adore greatly admire. ~ T. (talk) 21:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

U.S. Presidential Election, 1960

Score: +11 jowly Republicans
  • Nom & for - I really liked this one. American politics are always funny. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 19:19, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. gets my vote! *suicide* - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • 4. --L 03:15, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 03:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Kwakerjak has found his medium. The real challenge will be the U.S. Presidential Election of 1904, the dullest of all time.--Procopius 03:48, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Do I intend to write/rewrite articles for all the presidential campaigns? I don't know. Maybe. --Kwakerjak 04:15, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 06:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, and I'm looking forward to having these on the front page during Kwanzaa.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 20:23, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 00:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For that damned dead Dick Nixon. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 09:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Belatedly. Been meaning to read this for ages. -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 01:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Argos

Score: +16
  • Self-nom and for. I'm not a big self-nommer, but I really enjoyed writing this and it seems, on the evidence of Pee Review, a few others also quite liked it. -- Hindleyite 14:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For ~ I've been to an Argos, but it had a different name for some reason. ~ T. (talk) 14:11, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For A fine example of an article where having no fucking clue about the subject matter still left it with some jokes. --Sir Zombiebaron 18:24, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For So good, so good, and so true - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:05, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. And how about doing one on Iceland (supermarket)? -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 02:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 03:43, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Winston 15:43, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against... too obscure...or am I just stupid? -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 00:15, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
It's probably more British than obscure. Scores of millions of Brits, millions of norteamericanos and hundreds of thousands of Aussies know it. Think of it as a really bizarre kind of Pommy Wal-Mart if you will. -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 01:16, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
What, they don't have Argos in other countries? Just pretend it reads 'some cruddy American catalogue company' instead of 'Argos'. :) -- Hindleyite 11:51, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Some damned kookey article about some Brit shithole. I'll vote for it out of pity, but write about something all American next time, you goddam commie rat bastard... --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 19:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I don't know what the hell this article is about, or what an Argos is, or if it even exists. I'm even questioning whether Hindleyite was cognescent when he wrote this. Funny stuff though. For. --Anyone 20:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, although, frankly, it's just not British enough. Oh, you could see my tongue in my cheek? Dang. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I felt more detail was needed on the mysterious beings that lurk behind the scenes at Argos, so I added some and now I can vote for in good conscience. 15Mickey20 21:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Okay, maybe my changes weren't that great, but having been to Argos, I still think it needs something about the mysterious backroom happenings (or maybe I just have an old Jasper Carrott stand-up bit stuck in my head). 15Mickey20 18:11, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For because Americans need to know these things. --Zyrac 19:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • This bloody pen isn't working properly......bugger. For -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 20:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For America's overseas friends allies acquaintances.--Procopius 20:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For; read this a while ago, lolled, forgot to vote. Alas. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. A fine catalogue of humour. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 15:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, this article is dealing with UK "culture"--—Braydie 19:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

UnBooks:The Complete Idiot's Guide To Talking To Women

Score: +17.5 stupid thoughts

Nom & For - A lot of work went into this; one of the best UnBooks out there by far. Absolutely terrific. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Todd Lyons will never get laid. For--monika 05:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 09:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - The Blaque
  • For (?) ~ This just goes to show that after a over year here, I still have no idea which of my articles are funny, and which ones suck. Thanks for pointing this one out. ~ T. (talk) 11:40, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- Agree with Monika. Todd Lyons is the only one who'll never get laid. -- mowgli 12:46, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. XD --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 13:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For. The Todd Lyons hit parade continues.--Procopius 13:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - --Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against. Funny, definitely. But you can find this kind of humor all over the place.
    "Speaking of all over the place, my wife/girlfriend/whatever is so fat that her ass..." ..Ah, forget it...
    --So So 15:04, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- Hindleyite 15:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 19:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • against, don't hit me. it is funny, but it's an unbook not an article, it should be here UnBooks:Vote for Featured UnBook - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 19:59, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Llama-Llover 21:54, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --User:Nintendorulez 22:02, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against unbooks are mediocre jokes in themed giftwrapping. + article much to close to the truth. Be off with you --Vosnul 23:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I must admit, the lack of any "Now really, what kind of question is that?" responses was odd. Although if one formed it that way, it may be out of the question already... --Ж Kalir potentially sexier than you 03:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Seems good enough SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 03:49, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 06:27, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Winston 15:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- I helped it a little bit, and I think it's funny, so why not. LadySway1985 00:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Funny and useful. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. You saved my love life AND my marriage--I'll never get kicked in the balls again! Thanks T.! --Anyone 20:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Mrthejazz 23:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Definitely Against I didn't laugh at all, pretty weak. 24.94.19.107 00:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against I think that it could make for a good satire on the stupidity of male attitudes to women, but it just seems to use those attitudes as props - and that stuff has been done before, sadly. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, as per SoSo & HF.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. I would prefer there to be some more general advice mixed in, rather than just an endless procession of questions and answers. Well, not endless, but a procession nonetheless. 15Mickey20 21:54, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against. It is funny, but mostly a collection of good jokes and not really "a great piece of writing".---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 03:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For--Viking 12:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak AgainstFunny but more of a list than an article.--Winstanley1 11:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For the love of a good woman. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 14:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because I could actually use this. I can't get past hooking up at parties. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 01:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For- Nice! --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For- Amazing article props - Noradseven
  • For, it's funny enough as it is. Johnleemk 15:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Shortcut

Score: +11 Lost Travellers
  • N+F. I was on my way here to nominate something of mine, but somehow ended up getting lost. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 00:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Yeah, I read it. I read. I'm literate. Mmmhm. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 01:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Oh, I get it. The link above is a shortcut to the article, lol. Self-reference in its prime. Hold on, there's an article. Hmm, better read it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:37, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I don't know who wrote this but whoever they are they are a genius, a messiah even. - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 01:43, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For but the end seems a bit weak. Good enough despite that though. --Ж Kalir potentially sexier than you 02:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 06:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For jumping off buildings rather than going down the stairs. -- Hindleyite 10:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For haha Cornbread took the Shortest Road he could think of to Against Town.-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 12:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:57, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Fine, I guess. Not great. ~ T. (talk) 03:15, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For. Seems to have everything a Feature worthy article needs. What's the hold up? SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 03:40, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For--Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 06:23, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For It made me do a giggle --Olipro Icons-flag-gb Anchor KUN (Harass) 14:06, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Heehee. -- Paw_print.jpg 20:28, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I wonder why Jack Mort blanked this fine work of his and got himself banned for two weeks, though. -- The Colonel (talk) 11:27, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Smart and funny. Win/win. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 13:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • El Foro. Vive le Alamo! --Anyone 20:27, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 10:15, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against VFH has become a croweded field and this just doesn't rise above the pack. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. As ENeGMA said, though the current offerings aren't nearly as funny as the number of nominations might suggest.--Winston 13:00, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

UnBooks:Diary of a Caveman

Score: +13 people damn Urk for inventing monotheism

UnBooks:The n00b Survival Guide

Score: +12 Surviving n00bs
  • Self-nom (for now). I find it hilarious. Then again, I wrote it. I'll see how it does before I decide to vote on it. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 07:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
For --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 18:48, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It's pretty cool and funny. --Penguinofhonor the Great 18:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. From the dedication to the about the author, this delivers the goods. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 18:56, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 06:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • f0r. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 08:01, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. the noob stuff's been very done, everyone knows it, but this manages to make an old topic funny again. - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 14:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for. Loved the Noob/English/Spanish translations. If you drop the Kansas BOE template, I'll make this a full for. (Just a matter of principle.)--Procopius 03:00, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Merci. Full for.--Procopius 13:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:39, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, I was a n00b once. But I'm l33t now. No, really.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:40, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - passes the LOL test - David Gerard 21:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I especially liked that last line about the family and whatnot. --Anyone 21:32, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes indeed. And maybe add it as a link to the {{welcome}} template. ~ T. (talk)
  • For Heck I made that image. --Sir Zombiebaron 18:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong for. And what Todd Lyons said. --User:Nintendorulez 19:33, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against I just don't see how it's all that funny... --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:25, 6 November 2006
  • Against Don't find it funny.Sorry! --GCWINN 14:44, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

(UTC)

Cow Udders Caught in Barbed Wire

Score: +12 Unfortunate cases of Cow Udders Caught in Barbed Wire
  • Self Nom and For My most grotesque work. It's been through Pee Review, so at this point it should be good enough. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:56, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. There's just something about it... --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 04:54, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I love random shit like this! -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 06:17, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 06:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. very well written, maybe dry, but that just adds to the wikipedia feel, the footnotes and references are an extra attention to detail you rarely see - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 13:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ( VFH , means vote for huffing ? right? ). - Vosnul 14:03, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • No Thanks It just didn't appeal to me. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 14:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • 4. -L 05:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For with an odd look on my face. It's got a weird style to it... but in a way that makes it even more funny. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 23:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I'll vote for this one because you don't need another vote on water polo with sharks (which I like too, by the way). Anywho, good random crap. -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - The cows... why do they make fools of themselves? --Ж Kalir potentially sexier than you 04:12, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Some cows just can't think straight... --Gigabytemon 04:41, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For our society turning into one big seedy dervish of kinky sex. One can only hope. --Anyone 21:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Abstain. I'm torn like a barbed teat over this, but I can't seem to go either way. -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 08:09, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for. Well-written and funny, but it takes awhile to get into the meat teat of the piece.--Procopius 04:09, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against. Long, with too much cud and not enough chewing.--Winston 15:59, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The plight of these poor cows must be brought to light! -- Hindleyite 20:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

The Bureaucracy Channel

Score: +17 TVs at work

*Against. Way too listy.--Kevin Bell 02:13, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment, um, yeah. It's a programming schedule. They're like that.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Comment - And unlike most lists, it gives some humorous explanations. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Ok, ok, its good now.--Kevin Bell 00:58, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Procopius 12:16, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. "While you were outsourced"...genius. --Anyone 14:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For I could see myself watching this.-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 16:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against all lists. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 05:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
    Sigh see my comment above. Again, sigh.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I love lists, me. Great lists. Very listy. Remarkably list-like. An almost erotic sense of listability. Where would we be without lists ... Listless!! arf arf. (One of my many list-related jokes- for others, refer to the list.). I HATE commas though. You just got away with those. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Great content, despite the messy format. (Tip: If you need an extra level of subheadings, try "==== ====". Don't use the main title markup "= =" in the article body - it's butt ugly.) -- The Colonel (talk) 17:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
    MO fix. MO make funny words and pictures. MO not like formatting. MO king of jungle!--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For.Put that on Skynet.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 03:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Where can I find form 12323XCHFOR/b? -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 13:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 15:55, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 02:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Brilliant. Deliciously cruel sledge at the BBC, though Otis Redding deserves better -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 09:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Maybe you could parody more shows to fill in the "Tonight" schedule. Swordmaster 17:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Shades of Brazil in an article-sized dose that is remarkably non-listy. Yay! -- Imrealized ...hmm? 14:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against.--Winston 13:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

The white guy in All-4-One

Score: +15.5 bespectacled anomalies
  • For. InfiniteMonkey 06:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Yay, :] Interesting, I actually made it to the bottom of the article before being bored. -- Lacey clicky 20:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. I fear I'm too old to appreciate this--Winston 13:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Pontius Pilot

Score: +20 crucified voters
  • Comment. Mr Mayfair, was there a reason you deleted my vote? --Anyone 16:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment It was probably just a mistake since Tom voted for several articles in one big edit. Yours got lost. I've restored it below. —rc (t) 16:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Ah, here here. All's well that ends as well as it started out, no weller or less well than before. Thanks. --Anyone 12:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It is too short, but what's there is so damn well thought out and put together I can't say no. --Anyone 14:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. If it's expanded etc etc... Freemorpheme.gif 07:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For - David Gerard 10:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Humorous.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For and Against people who vote down articles based solely on their length. —rc (t) 20:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For and Against Anyone who votes down articles based solely on their length.-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 05:17, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Comment. Boooo. That is all. --Anyone 12:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For short, funny, to the point. A proper joke. Pewpewpew 01:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, because I'd rather see an article that is short and funny than one which gets padded out with unfunny extras for the sake of length. 15Mickey20 19:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 22:53, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For and a nod of agreement to Mickey. --SolarEquinox Icons-flag-us Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! - 02:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. paradox's, I love that picture.--Witt, Union leader of Union member UNion Entertain me* 05:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Against Although this article is very clever and quite funny, I can't vote for it because it's much too short to be featured. Great picture though. --Thetanmancan 03:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For--it's short and sweet, like most jokes should be. KappaDelta 01:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For an article with 80% less fat and 30% more sacrilege than other leading FA's!
    Research: USDA
    --So So 07:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I enjoyed this article very thoroughly--- Truly Yours, The Exalted One. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.30.42.178 (talk • contribs)
  • Unsigned, I need the diff for it to count. —rc (t) 07:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Good laughs --69.152.37.215 04:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Not that this needed someone else to vote for it. --Nakedman 00:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Gaberou 00:20, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against It was far too short, and I dunno.. I didn't find it EXTRA-ORDINARILY funny. -- Lacey clicky 20:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It made me laugh. All I need.--Procopius 14:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For It's about time this article gets nominated.--65.27.212.74 01:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Gaydar

Score: +17 centipoofs on the Gaydar
  • nom and for. I thought this was pretty funny and the graphic is genius, and it's got the potential to be even better. For instance, there must be some kind of gaydar jamming system, right?InfiniteMonkey 23:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for -- I'll change my vote to For after I make a few touch-ups. Note to all: halt voting on this submission until I've fixed it up a bit (nothing serious; just some minor tunings). Or not. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 23:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
I'm done, and for. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 23:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Against. Short and no laughs. The pic is good though. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 23:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thanks :) --Huffers 02:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong for. This is a funny. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 00:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Very Strong For. Not that it makes any difference, adding strength. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • A For so strong, its almost butch. I gave this one a good going over too. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong for, nice and edgy, good content balance, great puns.. yeah funny !.--Vosnul 10:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Reluctant For. Ok, fine, I'll vote for this gay-themed article, but this is the last one I'm voting for for a while.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For in a ruggedly heterosexual manner - David Gerard 12:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I don't care for the article, but the Gaydiation image made me laugh... You should VFP that one! --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Cream Of Meat LORVTSWHASOH Dog Fart Trombone 2cents.PNG 20:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Sure. References to Buckyballs and that mysterious siren in Vanilla Sky secured my vote. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Indeed yes. After I had snorted out big laughter-chunks at the image, the rest of the article fell into place. Freemorpheme.gif 09:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The humor is obvious and deserves to be noticed.--SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 15:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For: funny, and made me pull out my old Palm to see if http://www.freewarepalm.com/mature/gaydardeluxe_v22a.shtml still worked. -- Falcotron16.png !!! ??? 01:42, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Yesses.' Mostly for the Gaydiation picture. Dumitru 01:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • No thank you -Heh heh funny, but not enough for VFH. The picture is gold, though. --Señor DiZtheGreat Cuba flag large CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 21:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Against IMO, it just doesn't have that classic burning sarcasm that some of my favorites have. --Atomsk.gif Kaizer the Bjorn takkun Takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 03:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For because it was started by a friend of mine --Huffers 20:07, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For but I'm not for Gay marriage for straight people. -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 00:25, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For Gaydiation. LOL --Savant13 21:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • sorta For takes a concept and runs with it but maybe wants trimming a bit. A little tumescent for my tastes. Pewpewpew 02:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 22:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Thetanmancan 03:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Gay. --So So 06:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Agaynst. Not that funny. --Anyone 18:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Thuper For it'th tho, tho funny, and the imageth are jutht Fab-ulouth! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, mostly because of the "Jamming and Stealth" section. --Kwakerjak 00:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:04, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Fabulous. Simply Fabulous. --Legolasegb 18:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Previously Featured

Double Ristretto Venti Half-Soy Nonfat Decaf Organic Chocolate Brownie Iced Vanilla Double-Shot Gingerbread Frappuccino Extra Hot With Foam Whipped Cream Upside Down Double Blended, One Sweet'N Low and One Nutrasweet, and Ice

Score: +24 Double Ristretto... ah, fuck it.

Featured Despite Squig's graciousness, I'd rather keep things in order unless there's a compelling reason not to (like featuring the political article on the day of the elections). —rc (t) 06:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Nom & for - Ignore the long title. This is a work of art; an excellent parody of Starbucks, courtesy of Sir Squiggle. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 23:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I approve with great vigor. Ho hum! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I'll have whatever he had. For. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 00:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong for I approve of this article and everything it stands for. Marblefluss 02:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. If I vote against, they'll kill me. --{{User:Stevo the human/sig}} 02:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I work at a Starbucks. Hilarious. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 05:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because it's cute and has cute content. --Toratoritore 06:50, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Interesting article. ---- Codestream 07:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • 4. --L 07:15, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • A big fat FOR excellent stuff! Made me laugh, alot. --MrMetalFLower 10:39, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Nice stuff. Regular Starbucks' coffee makes my stomach feel like there's an alien in it.--Procopius 13:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • against. Good concept, but the actual article is ponderous and too predictable in my opinion. --Gubby 14:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Because of the childrens, and because it's funny. But mainly for the childrens. Tanktunker30px-Sucrose_b.gif Take heed, this user may or may not be naked and/or insane.
  • For - David Gerard 22:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For... yep --The Llama Llover!!! 23:28, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Against I'd like it better if it was good. Shotgun vote. Yay whores! --McDestroyertron (talk) 00:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I love my little Squiggle! --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:07, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Good God, that's a long title. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 01:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, though I don't quite see what all the fuss is about — that's what I order every time I go into a Starbucks. --Kwakerjak 04:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For You people make me sick. SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 04:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Hot tip - take some coffee in a thermos, and save $$$ --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 05:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I had a fun time reading this. Plus the picture of Cornbread working at Starbucks adds to the zaniness. I think I was at that Starbucks once, actually. I paid with a twenty and Cornbread tried to give me change for a ten. Good times. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 15:45, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Now there's an idea for MO or ZB to make a picture from. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 21:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
I'd try, but then I'd have to write a CB page...which would get huffed as vanity. It's just not worth it...and while I'm here, Abstain as I'm a Tim Horton's coffee kind of guy.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Did I not vote for this yet? -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 21:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I could've sword I had also already voted for this as well... --User:Nintendorulez 00:15, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For A very well written piece of ummmmmmm I don't know what it is. Very funny anyway.--Coleridge49 02:00, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment It seems the time for featuring is soon, and my article has +23 votes when Pontius Pilot, in 2nd place, has +18. Because it is an infinitely better article, and has patiently waited a very, very long time for this day, I say feature Pontius Pilot first. Unless something comes ahead of or ties with PP, in that case just feature mine :). I probably won't be here the rest of today or tomorrow, which is why I'm putting this here now. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:00, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Or should I say Frap Not that it really counts or anything. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 04:06, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For with half&half and two sugars--Witt, Union leader of Union member UNion Entertain me* 04:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Waiting for Godot

Score: +19 existential minutes
Comment - although it was funnier when you linked to Waiting For Godot. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  • For I like it. I like it a lot. Also, I fixed the link first...jerkfaces. --Anyone 16:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Procopius 16:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For -One of mine (well, mostly). --Jamtrousers 17:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - Funny, but I'm fucking sick of narrative articles, such as this, this, this, this, possibly this, and definitely this, plus many more. Unoriginality kills. Yawn. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 18:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Ha! --SolarEquinox Icons-flag-us Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! - 19:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, very Pythonesque. --Nydas 19:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For And not just because I added a few jokes. It's a very good representation of a book that, in all honesty, and for all its brilliance, deserves to be lampooned. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:41, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I actually enjoyed this play. Also the "small, green, sentient energy cloud" line is so random that I had to laugh. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 23:00, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Wow, this was funny before, but now it's terrific.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:09, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Agree with EMC. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 04:56, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Blah SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 05:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I wasn't sure I was cooked, but others were - David Gerard 11:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For...I actually laughed instead of just smirking, for once--Shandon 15:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Better than the play itself. -- Hindleyite 17:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Shall I vote for? Yes, I shall (Doesn't vote) -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A
  • Against. When I first looked at it I though, "Man, some stupid IP has vandalised it!" But when I looked at the history, I realised there was no such thing as the "non-vandalised" revision. Self-referencing has long jumped the shark, mate! -- The Colonel (talk) 14:03, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • YOU FOOLS!!! Before you ever, ever call this a load of carp, please actually understand the play. Oh, yeah and weak for. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC Icons-flag-gb MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 19:47, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
ESTRAGON: What about hanging ourselves?
VLADIMIR: Hmm. It'd give us an erection.
ESTRAGON: (highly excited) An erection!
VLADIMIR: With all that follows. Where it falls mandrakes grow. That's why they shriek when you pull them up. Did you not know that?
ESTRAGON: Let's hang ourselves immediately!
  • Comment: who called it a load of crap? I think ENeGMA summed up the idea pretty well- respectful lampooning (because no matter how strange, it is an excellent play). --Jamtrousers 20:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For got a kick out of the context, even if I hadn't read the actual thing (play or whatever.)--Witt, Union leader of Union member UNion Entertain me* 05:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I would love to see the parody of this Bekket play with only a mouth speaking, or "Krapp's last tape". Or anything by Ionesco.---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 01:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 18:30, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For Reading this in school was PAINFUL --Han 09:24, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:34, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For I loved that play when I saw it live. I was laughing cause no one in the audience knew what was going on, and I was like "How can you people not get it? There is nothing going on!" --Sir Zombiebaron 03:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. all high-brow and shit - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For: The dumbest play ever made lampooned by the funniest Uncyclopedia article ever written. I'm voting for it. Sir Master Pain (also known as Betty) 23:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
VLADIMIR: Well, let's go.
ESTRAGON: Yes, let's.
(They do not move.)
  • For Beautiful work --KUK nerd 04:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Meh. --Kwakerjak 15:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. InfiniteMonkey 05:58, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Archives

Awards, Decorations and Honours
Awards2 Awards Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Admin Rank · Ninjastars
Ranks &
Honours
Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the moment
Potatochopper of the Month

Foolitzer Prize
Writer of the Year · Uncyclopedian of the Year · RadicalX of the Year
RYA · User Space Affiliations · Past Winners


Limelight VFH · VFP · Best of · Top Ten: 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · Hall of Shame
Prix citron Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year · Sandwich of the Month · FFS
Events citron Poo Lit Suprise · Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball · The Article Whisperer
Happy Monkey Competition · Other competitions
Personal tools
projects