• Vote for an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
  • Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
  • IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
  • Unsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button () above the edit box.
  • You may nominate and vote for your own articles if you so choose - please note it on your nomination.
  • When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the entry using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
• Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
• Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
• Voters: Remember the Golden Rule: don't be a dick. Respect the person even if you don't like the writing. Be constructive in your criticisms.
• Writers: don't be a prima donna. If people offer constructive criticism and suggestions, listen, and be open to people editing your article (it is a wiki). It's unlikely your pieces are works of genius- otherwise, why would you be hanging out with us?

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must spend at least one week on pee review before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time and require no review (though it is still recommended).

VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.

VFH IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.

Rick James Version of the Bible

• Up da hizzy! I love this article; it deserves to be featured at least once in its lifetime. Also, it's damn funny. Check it out; you decide. Sir Master Pain (also known as Betty) 03:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Asperger Syndrome

• N+F. Because some people can't take a joke, and featuring this article seems a fitting punishment for this trolling, as Isra suggested.--<<>> 03:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Nah Not very funny, though I am not offended by it in any way. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:26, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Obligatory for. I think it's funnier (and less bitter) than Neurotypical syndrome which, oddly enough, hasn't raised any objections amongst us "NTs".  :) ~ T. (talk) 04:22, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

The Bureaucracy Channel

• N+F A guffaw coated with mirth, wrapped in ROFL.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 20:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Yah. -- Hindleyite 20:16, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• for. fantastic. like a beaurocracy themed 'tv go home' - jack mort | cunt | talk - 22:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• This would normally be the sort of thing I'd vote for, but this I just ain't feelin'. Weak Against. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• I can't help but feel partially to blame for this... --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 02:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Too listy for my tastes.--<<>> 02:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Way too listy.--Kevin Bell 02:13, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

  Comment, um, yeah. It's a programming schedule. They're like that.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

March of the Penguin Brothers

• N+F. I am just going outside and may be some time - and by the way, this morning I saw a group of penguins shooting at each other. Ah, British humor. Drop your panties, Sir William, I can not wait 'til lunchtime.--Procopius 21:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - ZOMG lawl wtf yes but procockius ur a n00b!!1one11 --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 23:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I didn't know those fuckers are so ruthless! -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 15:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Kaaah gah wah kaaah! (That's Antarctican for fish, but for anyway.) -- Hindleyite 18:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. In all honesty though, we should fuggedabout voting for this and just feature it. --Anyone 18:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 18:42, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Church of God the Wholly Incompetent

• Nom and For. Clearly divinely inspired - David Gerard 09:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - It's got "going in with a bullet" written all over it. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 09:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• David, you find the weirdest shit. Procopius, you write the weirdest shit. Modus, you vote for the weirdest shit...--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 09:31, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I liked "Compies are encouraged to read, critique, and grade their Bibles." Unsigned . ~ T. (talk) 11:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 12:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For. Transcends over so many other dull articles about religion, but touches like this really sold me. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 15:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• For The author needs all the encouragement He can get. --Pietro 17:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• For This article not being featured will be accepted as proof of an incompetent god. --EvilZak 19:16, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Procopius must use some machine to churn out good articles this quickly. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 19:31, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Comment ~ Yeah, he rips them off of me 98% of the time. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 20:26, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment ~ Dammit, emc, I told you I mailed the check.--Procopius 00:52, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

• For Great article, actually competent. Jdude 00:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. All class. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 14:04, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. This is made of win and lol. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 15:04, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. The article is so well done I believe if it was put on Wikipedia (God forbid) they would be fooled into believing it as truth. And also, omniuselessness might be the greatest word ever. Maybe. --Anyone 18:06, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Almost as good as chocolate Nutri Grain bars. -- Hindleyite 18:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Fore! Only an idiot God would have allowed this article to be written.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 19:58, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Pretend I say something witty here (if only I had been created without obvious failings...).--<<>> 01:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

V8 Supercars

• Nom and For. Just see how the first sentence puts the subject-matter in a nutshell - "Australians love two things: drinking and driving." No need for explanation - this article rocks! -- The Colonel (talk) 21:25, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. i dont get it. --JimmyB 21:57, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

• Here's my advice: Just take what the article tells you as the truth. If - I say if - it tells you that Holden is an Australian subsidary of General Motors, then you just believe that Holden is indeed so. Don't worry about those names and places too much - they are not really all important. -- The Colonel (talk) 22:11, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

• Combines two of my favourite things; words and pictures...oh, and cars...and strange foreign lands. That totals...4. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Because Racecar is racecaR spelled backwards and forwards.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 03:50, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Maaaaaate! - David Gerard 09:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's well written and it's different - would look good on the front page. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 09:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. When you make/a real great blunder/Have a beer/and then go chunder.--Procopius 13:12, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:30, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 19:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

*Against. There's some minor inconsistencies, such as the caption of the Playstation 2 game cover, which captions it as a film. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 20:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

• • Hey EMC, that was part of the "joke" (such as it is). There is no movie, just the game, which is V8 Supercars in Oz and TOCA Race Car Driver or whatever in other parts of the world. Cheers -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 01:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Of course. All apologies. For. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 16:09, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
      • No apology needed. It was a bit obscure... Cheers -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 23:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Gotta vote for my own garbage, don't I? Thanks for the nom & votes, guys. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 01:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Anyone 18:02, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

The Life and Times of Kraft Dinner

• (Re-)Nom and For. Possibly the best thing I've seen quasi-ed. And since re-noms are the go, why not? Shandon was too modest to re-nom it him/herself, but I hope he/she won't be too modest to vote for it. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 09:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Damn it, Armando! If I told you once, I told you a thousand times, For! --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 11:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• wasn't even added to or altered before it was renomed, dirty. For anyway though, cos it's worthy. - jack mort | cunt | talk - 16:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For And I'll vote for every time it should come up. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:18, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:41, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 00:20, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Fo sho. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 07:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because the line "They became a mixed pot of stirred limbs and surprise manure." alone is enough to get VFH'd. --Anyone 14:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Kraft Dairylea cheese triangles again. -- Hindleyite 14:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Why didn't it get featured to begin with? Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 17:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• For...and thanks fellas--Shandon 21:39, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 08:46, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

The Putz Who Stole Hanukkah

• Self-Nom and For. This was incredibly hard to write, and its finally ready. Hands down the best article I've written. Thanks to Modusoperandi and Squiggle for the pics. Now VOTE! Reskin for the holidays...? -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 04:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For; yeah, I was part of it. So what? It's good, really good. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:35, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For...though I forsee MoneySign swooping in and saying it's too in-jokey--Shandon 08:13, 17 October 2006 (PDT)

  At least you haven't let it turn you bitter.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

• FOR! Says it all, really. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Beautiful! <puts down mirror> Oh! The page is good, too. For.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 17:26, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, I saw this one baking, and it looked quite yummy a while ago.--<<>> 18:38, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

*For. --Anyone 20:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC) Since I hadn't read The Grinch Who Stole Christmas in a while I didn't realize how unremarkably similar these two are, but upon re-reading both I see that only the words differ from story to story, where as the rest feels the same plus jews. Abstain. --Anyone 17:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

• For, This stuff is the shizzle.--The One and Only Czar Yah 21:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Yes. This might be the best article I've ever read.--Kevin Bell 02:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• For wonderful pic. the rest of it is awesome.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 20:16, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
• For. Cornbread can drop the rhymes.--Procopius 04:01, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• For 11:46, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 14:46, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Simply amazing! Great job!--• T to the Roooy • Proud to be Say 'Hi!' 17:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. A very entertaining read. 15Mickey20 20:36, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - I love you Nightmare975 22:40, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Jewish Content. --Sir Zombiebaron 02:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For - Probably the most clever damn thing I've seen on Uncyclopedia. --Rabid Jaguar 03:54, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I wish I understood the fuss. This article is essentially verbatim Seuss with a variety of Jewish words substituted. Not nearly original enough for me to vote for, though I quite enjoyed the main picture.--Winston 04:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Discussion Continued...

• For. --Shade [...][Praise me/Yell at me][Worthless Additions] 04:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. For pretty much the same reasons as Winston. It's not that hard to tweak an existing work to a new theme. Also, I didn't find it funny. But as a point of order, I don't think it's an encyclopedia article. I think it's an UnBook. I move to have it withdrawn from VFH and self-nommed for UnBook of the Month. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 08:49, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It's a non-concept wrapped up in cheap paper. It doesn't make the central issue funny - it merely renders it trivial. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 09:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Enviably well written, really impressive, but, alas, no laughs... --Sir Jam 09:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Didn't find it particularly original or funny (especially the ending). --So So 14:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, super-good. but agreed it's more an unbook than article - jack mort | cunt | talk - 16:37, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against-funny, but not original -- The Llama Llover
• For As Alliteration attests, amusement's ability abides apathetically apropos absurd antics' absence. --EvilZak 05:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 11:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I'd say great if it wasn't such a terrible piece of useless trash.--Vosnul 17:14, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
• For hahahaha --JimmyB 21:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I lol'd. --User:Nintendorulez 16:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Sorry, but we just had a Dr. Suess themed book featured. Give everybody some time to recover. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 19:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Comment -And why should that make a difference, EMC? We're trying to feature the funniest articles, it shouldnt matter how it is written... -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 19:37, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

For. (settled in the IRC channel; "dispute" resolved) --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 20:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

• For-Very witty article, it fits in with the actual lines of the book very well.--Ganall 20:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against* Same reasons as So So and everyone else. Enigma16 -Unsigned, doesnt count. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 00:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC) - Sir Cornbread, doesn't count. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 00:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC) EMC's sig has a dancing guy, therefore it doesnt count. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 00:36, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• I change my vote to Against because Cornbread is a pompous jerk who thinks hes sweet because he can copy a published book. Also, I'm Jewish.--Kevin Bell 03:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Discussion Continued

• Against Man this is a total load of shit. Not only is Sir Cornbread, an uptight, christian, racist prick, he also writes completely craparticles. Even a 10 year old could do a better parody. Also the fact that he refuses to take criticism and when he comes across someone who beats him in an arguement he says they don't count because it has a dancing guy means that he probably is a 10 year old. With ADD. Or worse.--Anonymous 09:38, 23 October 2006 (UCT) -Unisgned doenst count. And for the record I'm half-Jewish you retard. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 05:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Napoleon Bonaparte

• Nom and Strong For Wow. Clearly, Kwakerjak knows his French history. Vote for him at UN:NUB, too. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• +1 for using the 69,105 number. --L 05:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Could use some more pictures, but well-done.--Procopius 13:36, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, because I'm so vain Carly Simon wrote a song about me. --Kwakerjak 15:21, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for. Too close to reality- needs a few more dashes of satire and absurdity to lighten it up. InfiniteMonkey 23:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for. I like it, but the short jokes get repetitive, even if that was intended. --So So 01:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Love it! And I voted for the author. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 04:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's very VFH worthy. --Anyone 20:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Lunatic genius. Swordmaster 21:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Literary genus.--<<>> 15:49, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
• For. Crudely written in places, but quite good overall.--Winston 04:12, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Pretty good, but overly long on the short jokesand on the facts. And didn't pick up the gauntlet Napoleon dropped when he wrote to Josie telling her not to bathe for a week before he got home. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 09:37, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Forrrr! - jack mort | cunt | talk - 16:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 17:39, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For This would go along great with The French Revolution article we just had. Of course, I think the article might need some more pictures. --General Insineratehymn 02:37, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 19:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• For It has footnotes! --Lenin & McCarthy 20:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Jacksonville

• Nom and For I'm from Jacksonville so i like it.--Kevin Bell 03:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Comment -If its a self-nom say so...-- Sir C  Holla | CUN 03:06, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It's well-written, but it has the feel of a Wikipedia entry.--Procopius 13:36, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• For It's very funny and creative. The picture of Jacksonville during the Bubonic Plague needs the bottom part to be edited out. It clearly says that it's a picture of Naples. Other than that, good job. --Thetanmancan 00:53, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Excellent piece of magnitude equal to that of Jimmy Mcormick--Damndman 01:38, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Good shit. --Everyone (mainly Alden) 19:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Great article, loved the picture, the motto makes me smile....:-DDDDDDD --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 09:19, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
• Against. Feels too random. --Anyone 19:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:23, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Not especially.--Winston 04:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Quite good, but not quite front page. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 09:40, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. A little mad but still well written and funny. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 16:12, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Not yet - good material, needs better organisation - David Gerard 08:49, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --JimmyB 22:02, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I sense <s>sockpuppets Bunburys. In the form of two users, one with this as his only contrib, and one who apparently doesnt even exist... -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 00:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)</s>
• Comment Dear Cornbread, why you gotta say that about my friends. Yeah i know them, but they are in no way, Bunburys. Their votes are based on merit. In fact, it was one of them who infromed me of uncyclopedia to begin with. --Kevin Bell 03:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Discussion Continued

• For. I'll believe you on this one, and I find the article funny. Sorry for accusing, it just seemed suspicious. Lets put this in the past... -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 03:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Ringo Needs Some Money

• Nom and For Absurdist Beatles Humor is a plus in my book.--The One and Only Czar Yah 01:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 02:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Fab For This is really good. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 03:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• For The literal "filler" track is funny, Pete Best having more money than Ringo is funny... The Beatles are going to be a new Uncyclopedia meme. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 06:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For. But didn't Harrison need the money?--Procopius 13:36, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• For On a somewhat related note, I find myself wondering just what I would do if Ringo sang out of tune. --Kwakerjak 15:14, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Mediocre at best. --So So 02:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I regret to inform you that your vote doesn't count. We don't let convicted felons vote. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 02:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment: Eh? -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I act only for the greater good

• For. --Anyone 19:35, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 14:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. It gets a bit silly shortly before the track listing, but not enough to spoil a really funny article. I added a quick explanation for his poverty at the start. 15Mickey20 20:36, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Almost, but no. It's close. Keep improving the humour to noise ratio.--Winston 04:17, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, just. Poor Ringo. Did Pete Best do an album too? -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 09:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• FOR - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 16:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- Hindleyite 14:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Mickey Mouse the Great

• Nom and For. Strong writing, excellent pictures, and an extremely high amount of internal consistency. A good complement to the Disneyland article.--Procopius 03:34, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's funny and much closer to the truth than people are willing to admit.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:40, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• Nah We already featured Disneyland, but I didn't particularly like that article either. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:25, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 04:11, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - winnah - David Gerard 06:12, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. It's good, not great, but since I wasn't here for Disneyland it's fresh and therefore, refreshing. Or something like that. --Anyone 11:46, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
• fuck my ass, ten out of ten for effort. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 16:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. A fantastic work of historical scholarship. But why was Britney Spears never tried for her role in the Mousketeer atrocities? -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 14:10, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

The white guy in All-4-One

• Nomination & For -I actually read it all the way through, and I found it hilarious. Kudos to Procopius. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 21:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Erraticus. Least we forget. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 21:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• All-4-one. Simply brilliant. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 00:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Dammit, this is going to keep me up all night. For.--Kwakerjak 02:49, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against Because I didn't laugh, don't get it and until I do, I'm against featuring something I didn't find funny. I have a talk page ya know.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 04:38, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• La la la,for my own work, dum-te-dum-dum.--Procopius 11:57, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. And where do you come up with this stuff?! --Anyone 12:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional for creationist viewpoint is begging to be added -- Soul101 ~_MA^REPENT! 13:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • As does the Krautbluesist one - David Gerard 22:17, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 18:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For--Lt. Wyoming 21:33, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - Procopius, you are a genius -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:50, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --monika 18:55, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 22:17, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A
• For. I just wish there was some way to contact him to let him know that he's being featured here. "Dear White guy from All-4-One"... --So So 02:13, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I love stuff like this. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 03:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. very good - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:53, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. 71.250.118.239 20:27, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
  • That was me. Goshzilla 21:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
• against huh? --JimmyB 22:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 19:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Short and sweet. --Thetanmancan 02:22, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Hays Code

• Nom and For - David Gerard 15:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For One of the best article's I've read in a very, very long time. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 16:11, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• For I loved it, it made me chuckle. --Nightmare975 21:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• fdasfdsdfsa1dfsadfsforfdsafdsafdsa! --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 02:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For. Creative writing, jokes that jump out of nowhere, just great all around. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 03:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Frankly, my dear, I don't give an against. Therefore, I give a Strong For. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• for, <this comment censored by the MPAA>.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:46, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Really fine writing. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 05:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• 4. --L 06:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. ^_^ 12:04, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Yes and Very much Yes. Because maybe if it's on the front page, a hollywood producer will read it and start making Ass-kicking Hippie 2: Pacifist Fury. --Anyone 14:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• "Son, sit down. Once I voted for one of my own articles. I'm not proud of it, but I'd rather you hear it from me than on the playground."--Procopius 02:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 18:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• FOR YES. --monika 19:09, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --Kwakerjak 15:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Very smart. --Thetanmancan 01:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. sick. you are blatantly in the middle of A-level film studies. itallian neo-realism and shocking cinema. watch doom generation by gregg araki, you can get a whole essay out of that. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Brilliant. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 00:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Jackson Pollock

• N+F. It's all in the name. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 00:01, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• Completely uninterested For I would like to state categorically, and for the record, that I had nothing to do with this article. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:03, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, although it bothers me that all the pics say "Vincent Van Gogh" on them...-- Sir C  Holla | CUN 00:31, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• For But I think it still needs some work. Needs to flow a little better, some of the jokes seem kinda random. InfiniteMonkey 04:03, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. An instant laugh. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 06:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• 4. --L 06:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Definitely funny in spots, but the random wackiness gets tiresome as you go on. --So So 07:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • comment would it make sense to cut all of section 3, or cut it down to a single paragraph? InfiniteMonkey 17:09, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment. Yeah, it was section 3 that made me go from indifferent to against. --So So 02:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Donut Buy One!|F@H|MUN|NS|Please Help Me|. 12:52, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• I can't believe you are actually buying this piece of garbage... I mean, sort of for. The Jack Pollock I perceive is someone that makes sculptures out of dead rats, causes people to become violently ill and claims it's all part of the experience, and yes, I think this article is a bit too long and dull. -- The Colonel (talk) 14:56, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 15:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. 11:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I'll be honest...it was the "rabid, frothing vibrator" part that sold me. --Anyone 14:17, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Beautifully moving! Appears to describe the mating habits of Jackson Pollock... --Ж Kalir, Crazy Indie Gamer _{(missile ponies for everyone!)} 20:19, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Oldsmobile...-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 18:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, just to see what User:Mhaille does this time.  c • > • cunwapquc? 06:51, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Not great, but it made me laugh more than once, so it's good enough for me. --Thetanmancan 00:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, could do with trimming. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Several Species Of Small Furry Animals Gathered Together In A Cave and Grooving With A Picture of Some Squiggles. FOR. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 21:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Waiting for Godot

• N+F Nice one. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 16:14, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment - although it was funnier when you linked to Waiting For Godot. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

• For I like it. I like it a lot. Also, I fixed the link first...jerkfaces. --Anyone 16:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Procopius 16:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For -One of mine (well, mostly). --Jamtrousers 17:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against - Funny, but I'm fucking sick of narrative articles, such as this, this, this, this, possibly this, and definitely this, plus many more. Unoriginality kills. Yawn. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 18:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Ha! --SolarEquinox Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! - 19:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, very Pythonesque. --Nydas 19:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For And not just because I added a few jokes. It's a very good representation of a book that, in all honesty, and for all its brilliance, deserves to be lampooned. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:41, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I actually enjoyed this play. Also the "small, green, sentient energy cloud" line is so random that I had to laugh. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 23:00, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Wow, this was funny before, but now it's terrific.--<<>> 04:09, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Agree with EMC. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 04:56, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Blah 05:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - I wasn't sure it was cooked, but others were - David Gerard 11:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• For...I actually laughed instead of just smirking, for once--Shandon 15:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Better than the play itself. -- Hindleyite 17:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Shall I vote for? Yes, I shall (Doesn't vote) -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A
• Against. When I first looked at it I though, "Man, some stupid IP has vandalised it!" But when I looked at the history, I realised there was no such thing as the "non-vandalised" revision. Self-referencing has long jumped the shark, mate! -- The Colonel (talk) 14:03, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• YOU FOOLS!!! Before you ever, ever call this a load of carp, please actually understand the play. I quote from it:

"Estragon: What about hanging ourselves?

Vladimir: Hmm. It'd give us an erection.

Estragon: (highly excited). An erection!

Vladimir: With all that follows. Where it falls mandrakes grow. That's why they shriek when you pull them up. Did you not know that?

Estragon: Let's hang ourselves immediately!"

Oh, yeah and weak for. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 19:47, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment: who called it a load of crap? I think ENeGMA summed up the idea pretty well- respectful lampooning (because no matter how strange, it is an excellent play). --Jamtrousers 20:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

• For got a kick out of the context, even if I hadn't read the actual thing (play or whatever.)--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 05:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I would love to see the parody of this Bekket play with only a mouth speaking, or "Krapp's last tape". Or anything by Ionesco.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 01:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 18:30, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Reading this in school was PAINFUL --Han 09:24, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:34, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• For I loved that play when I saw it live. I was laughing cause no one in the audience knew what was going on, and I was like "How can you people not get it? There is nothing going on!" --Sir Zombiebaron 03:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. all high-brow and shit - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Hermaphrodite

• SN+F. Just Quasi'd due to stagnation with a +16. Hopefully it still gets the votes, but doesnt get buried on the VFH page this time... -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 04:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment. Actually, it was +14, but who's counting? ;)--<<>> 14:14, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

• I'm still for it, though it bugs me a bit that you renom'd it a mere two days after it was pulled and Quasi'd.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• I said it beFORe, I'll say it again. For. I love it. 05:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - again -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. John1728 10:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Not For. Against was too strong a word. --Anyone 13:44, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Still for.--<<>> 14:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against Again, I didn't find it all that funny. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:27, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:53, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For...gee I wish I could do this with The Life and Times of Kraft Dinner--Shandon 22:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

  Hug? --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

• *Sigh* Fine, weak for. Based primarily on the strength of the images. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• Not against. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 01:53, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• Still Against But I don't understand why was it not featured already. See talk page. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 12:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Is it because people like me have stopped voting as much? Too many of these things are getting stalled at a dozen votes or so.  c • > • cunwapquc? 07:15, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Still for. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 13:06, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. The pictures are just plain sick, and it's not funny. --thematrixeætsyou, the kickass foo (talk) (flames) 05:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I agree, it's not funny, it's just offensive.--T-Roooy 11:15, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

• Quoting Jonathan Edwards...YOU SHALL BURN FOR YOUR BELIEFS, SINNER! --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 05:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

• For before, For now. May the blessings of the multisexual deity be upon you.--Procopius 15:52, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Because this is funny, and it's just offensive.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 18:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I only nearly laughed once, and that was at four words: "asexual amoeba named Jenny." All the other words failed me. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:51, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• For I always respect Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy's opinion. Unfortunately I have to disagree with him on this one. Hermaphrodite is a funny article that, in my opinion, is funny enough to be featured. --Thetanmancan 20:04, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. A decent concept but the content fails to deliver. --So So 07:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. A dictionary-length gag dragged out too long. The "it" thing left a bad taste. I reckon that when making fun of a minority that one (presumably) doesn't belong to, if kid gloves aren't available, one should at least go the veal gloves. Liberace would be spinning in his sunbed. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 08:56, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For because i never saw it first time around. it's good, but shame on you for renomming yourself after 2 days. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:15, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, the shemale statue made it all the better. --Nightmare975 23:43, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. This thing managed to take me all the way to the outer space and then back here to Earth, but, still, it failed to show me even one darn punchline. -- The Colonel (talk) 09:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Solid Gold

• SN+F. A well deserved satirical poke in the eye for Shari'a Law.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It's alright, but not what I'd call feature quality. And isn't this like the fifth self-nom you've done recently? The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a virus. 06:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

  Um, no. It's the third, ever. Unless you mean VFP, then yes, I am a nom whore.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

• For on effort, at the least - David Gerard 09:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I enjoyed it. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 14:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For You voted against me because of self nom's once...you're slowly degenerated into a common vote whore.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 15:52, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

  Comment/apology on your talkpage.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:10, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

• Strong For Modus = Very funny. And I certainly don't mind self noms - I does them meself, in facts I does. Look at French Revolution or HowTo:Skip School. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Great idea. For. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 01:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For 05:52, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Another article from the brilliant mind of Modusoperandi. --Hhamdy283 00:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, again. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 18:31, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For.... eh, what the hell --The Llama Llover
• For. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 06:22, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I don't know what it is I'm not getting; apparently, it's the part of the article that the "funny" comes from. --Kwakerjak 23:57, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

  Comment. It's satire. As such it's more "Ah", rather than "Moo ha-ha!". Well, bits are "Moo ha-ha!", but only if you aren't right in the head. Which some of us aren't. Moo ha-ha...--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

• For. I laughed. I confess I don't understand the show's tie-in to fundamentalist Islam, but I laughed all the same, which is a sign of quality.--Procopius 16:01, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Well researched and put together, and very creative. Not the funniest article to be VFH'd but humour isn't everything. --Anyone 15:22, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against It lacks proper execution, pun not intended. Though the premise has a lot of potential, most of the jokes are simply about people being executed, which gets really old really fast. However, I do like the line "shameless lack of shame". --Thetanmancan 00:42, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment What can I say? Shari'a is like that.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

• For - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I've never seen the show, but it's worth it for some of the pics... -- Hindleyite 12:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

But Seriously...

• LOL after subtlety. Nom and For - David Gerard 10:23, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Heh. --L 10:44, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• A very dry For.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:08, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Very for. We need more articles of such high quality. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 14:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Oh dear Lord this is funny...--<<>> 14:39, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• FOR! But seriously though, it's one of the best articles currently up for featuring. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For because life is futile.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 15:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Definitely for. Funny stuff. ----SolarEquinox Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! - 16:00, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Not front-page funny, but what it lacks in hilarity (which it does) it makes up for in creativity and well-thought-out-ness (which it has a lot of). And also I've been giving out a lot of "Against" lately so it's time to mix it up. --Anyone 20:09, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Random and pointless. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 05:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. But seriously... 06:19, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:41, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For John1728 10:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Hardwick Fundlebuggy does it again! And this time is once too much. I've called the proper authorities on you, sir, and with any luck you'll be in the slammer by midnight. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For This article is unique to me in the fact that it is the first article by someone else that I like so much that I wish that I had written it. OK, maybe Fisher Price: A Retrospective. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 18:18, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Same reasoning as my vote on the Godot one. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 05:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Definitively FOR. Speaking of defining stuff, did you find all those synonyms/similar words for serious in a thesaurus? Bloody good stuff, though. The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a virus. 23:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. This was the first article I wrote here and yes, a thesaurus is a handy thing. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 13:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Another nice looking article by HF... But seriously, I'd rather read a thesuarus page by page, from cover to cover, than paragraphs of pure vocabulary mixed in a pot of pointless drivels. -- Colonel Swordman, currently under the influence of Red Shirts effect, 14:26, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for.If a grown man wants to run around in giant shoes throwing custard at voles, then fine. But let him do it in the privacy of his own home and under cover of darkness." I laughed at this line, and this garners a weak for, because I actaully laughed.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 05:58, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against Funny, but not developed enough or long enough to be a featured article. --Thetanmancan 00:30, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:11, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Pontius Pilot

• Nom and for. This article is hilarious and the picture has been featured. --Onion 01:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against, it's cute, but too short.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC) Abstain, add more and it'll be a for.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:22, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
• For? Cool. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. I just re-read it. Not to brag or anything, but I'm a frickin' genius! I forgot how good that article was. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very short, but the entire thing is hilarious. Should be expanded, but until such a time, still has my support. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Regretfully Against. Its a great joke and I love the pic, but sorry STM its just too short. It is hilarious though. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 05:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Short, but hilarious. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very good. 14:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. Mr Mayfair, was there a reason you deleted my vote? --Anyone 16:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Comment It was probably just a mistake since Tom voted for several articles in one big edit. Yours got lost. I've restored it below. —rc (t) 16:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Ah, here here. All's well that ends as well as it started out, no weller or less well than before. Thanks. --Anyone 12:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

• For. It is too short, but what's there is so damn well thought out and put together I can't say no. --Anyone 14:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. If it's expanded etc etc... 07:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 10:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Humorous.--<<>> 14:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For and Against people who vote down articles based solely on their length. —rc (t) 20:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• For and Against Anyone who votes down articles based solely on their length.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 05:17, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment. Boooo. That is all. --Anyone 12:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

• For short, funny, to the point. A proper joke. Pewpewpew 01:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, because I'd rather see an article that is short and funny than one which gets padded out with unfunny extras for the sake of length. 15Mickey20 19:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Well-said, sir. Brevity is the soul of wit. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 20:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 22:53, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For and a nod of agreement to Mickey. --SolarEquinox Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! - 02:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. paradox's, I love that picture.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 05:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against Although this article is very clever and quite funny, I can't vote for it because it's much too short to be featured. Great picture though. --Thetanmancan 03:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• For--it's short and sweet, like most jokes should be. KappaDelta 01:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
• For an article with 80% less fat and 30% more sacrilege than other leading FA's!
  Research: USDA
  --So So 07:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Washington and Lafayette

• Self-nom and for. Coming to a theater near you.--Procopius 12:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 12:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for. I like it, but I don't know why. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:27, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
• For YES.--Ginchael 00:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I have no idea what the joke is, but it is beautifully laid out which gives me the Pot Noodle horn. I could look at it all day. 20:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, Procopius makes history come alive.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• For maintaining the morale of the young republic, I vote yes.--Rljenk 01:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 11:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• For ...better than most...though the pic of 'em both togethah could use an upgrade--Shandon 04:58, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I enjoyed the echoes of all the different classic comedy teams. ----SolarEquinox Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! 20:49, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's like a fine tooled Queen Ann. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 12:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Classy. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 22:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Very creative. --Thetanmancan 03:29, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. 23:51, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Fuck. I forgot to vote for this. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 06:28, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against Close but not quite. It's very well written, flows well, follows a narrative arc and uses images well. However, it needs two or three places that just make me laugh, or at least chuckle. InfiniteMonkey 04:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against -- The Llama Llover
• For. Gets saved from stagnation removal by making me laugh (and being clever in the process).--<<>> 18:24, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
• For - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Gaydar

• nom and for. I thought this was pretty funny and the graphic is genius, and it's got the potential to be even better. For instance, there must be some kind of gaydar jamming system, right?InfiniteMonkey 23:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for -- I'll change my vote to For after I make a few touch-ups. Note to all: halt voting on this submission until I've fixed it up a bit (nothing serious; just some minor tunings). Or not. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 23:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm done, and for. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 23:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Against. Short and no laughs. The pic is good though. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 23:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

thanks :) --Huffers 02:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

• Strong for. This is a funny. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 00:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Very Strong For. Not that it makes any difference, adding strength. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• A For so strong, its almost butch. I gave this one a good going over too. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong for, nice and edgy, good content balance, great puns.. yeah funny !.--Vosnul 10:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Reluctant For. Ok, fine, I'll vote for this gay-themed article, but this is the last one I'm voting for for a while.--<<>> 14:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• For in a ruggedly heterosexual manner - David Gerard 12:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I don't care for the article, but the Gaydiation image made me laugh... You should VFP that one! --Mindsunwound: (MUN) Cream Of Meat Man Babies 20:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Sure. References to Buckyballs and that mysterious siren in Vanilla Sky secured my vote. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Indeed yes. After I had snorted out big laughter-chunks at the image, the rest of the article fell into place. 09:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. The humor is obvious and deserves to be noticed.-- 15:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• For: funny, and made me pull out my old Palm to see if http://www.freewarepalm.com/mature/gaydardeluxe_v22a.shtml still worked. --  !!! ??? 01:42, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Yesses.' Mostly for the Gaydiation picture. Dumitru 01:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• No thank you -Heh heh funny, but not enough for VFH. The picture is gold, though. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 21:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against IMO, it just doesn't have that classic burning sarcasm that some of my favorites have. -- Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 03:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
• For because it was started by a friend of mine --Huffers 20:07, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
• For but I'm not for Gay marriage for straight people. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 00:25, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• For Gaydiation. LOL --Savant13 21:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• sorta For takes a concept and runs with it but maybe wants trimming a bit. A little tumescent for my tastes. Pewpewpew 02:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 22:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --Thetanmancan 03:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Gay. --So So 06:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Agaynst. Not that funny. --Anyone 18:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Thuper For it'th tho, tho funny, and the imageth are jutht Fab-ulouth! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, mostly because of the "Jamming and Stealth" section. --Kwakerjak 00:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:04, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

• For. Fabulous. Simply Fabulous. --Legolasegb 18:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Previously Featured

HowTo:Be pretentious

Featured —rc (t) 05:57, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

• Quite Right. This proverbial article has improved vastly, and as such deserves to be nominated. --Anyone 19:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Affirmative, good sir.--<<>> 19:52, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, tho' truly I care not a whiff of its vastly improved nature, the page tis funny, what?--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For If, after reading this article, anyone still thinks that my ragamuffin, run-of-the-mill, and hopelessly crude piece of tripe HowTo:Skip School is better than this literate, elegant work of prose, than thank you. But this is good too. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:12, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Ha! What a positively grand article!--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 04:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• The authorial status I enjoy with regard to this article leads me to vote For --Jamtrousers 09:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• 5 --L 10:32, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Marry, I am voting for this vastly excellent article, Horatio--T-Roooy 10:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Procopius 11:57, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 18:52, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. --User:Nintendorulez 22:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. 01:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- --The Blaque 11:15, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
• El Forro.  c • > • cunwapquc? 06:42, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 13:23, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Funny and informative. 15Mickey20 18:51, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:50, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• NO MORE HOWTOs! -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 08:04, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• ...unless they're this good. For. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 14:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --The Llama Llover

Archives

• Archive 1
• Archive 2
• Archive 3
• Archive 4
• Archive 5
• Archive 6
• Archive 7

Awards, Decorations and Honours
	Awards	Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Admin Rank · Ninjastars
	Ranks & Honours	Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the moment Potatochopper of the Month Foolitzer Prize Writer of the Year · Uncyclopedian of the Year · RadicalX of the Year RYA · User Space Affiliations · Past Winners
	Limelight	VFH · VFP · Best of · Top Ten: 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · Hall of Shame
	Prix citron	Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year · Sandwich of the Month · FFS
	Events citron	Poo Lit Suprise · Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball · The Article Whisperer Happy Monkey Competition · Other competitions