From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:VFH(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 278: Line 278:
*'''For'''. Brilliant! --{{:User:Isra1337/sig}} 21:47, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
*'''For'''. Brilliant! --{{:User:Isra1337/sig}} 21:47, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
* FOR (thank you very much) if you liked THAT, you should check out mcdonalds. That place is so very legal...I hope.-EnvyOfBobBarker october 5 2006
* FOR (thank you very much) if you liked THAT, you should check out mcdonalds. That place is so very legal...I hope.-EnvyOfBobBarker october 5 2006
*'''For''' <font color=green>It made me laugh. Viva la France! Haha</font color=green>
== [[Pontius Pilot]] ==
== [[Pontius Pilot]] ==

Revision as of 14:47, October 10, 2006

  • Vote for an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
    • Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
    • IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
    • Unsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button (Button sig) above the edit box.
    • You may nominate and vote for your own articles if you so choose - please note it on your nomination.
    • When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the entry using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
  • Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
  • Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
  • Voters: Remember the Golden Rule: don't be a dick. Respect the person even if you don't like the writing. Be constructive in your criticisms.
  • Writers: don't be a prima donna. If people offer constructive criticism and suggestions, listen, and be open to people editing your article (it is a wiki). It's unlikely your pieces are works of genius- otherwise, why would you be hanging out with us?

If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it HERE.

Violators of this policy will be SHOT.
Then we shoot them again.
Any funny business and we shoot you a third time.
If you think I'm kidding, go ahead and test my patience.
I love you.
(if you read aloud the fine print above, your dog will also be shot)
(if you don't have a dog, you will be given a puppy, which you will raise into a dog, at which point it will be shot)
Surviving dogs will be GIVEN A DOG BISCUIT.

Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must be at least a week old before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time.

VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.

VFH IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.

UnBooks:Horton Hires a Ho

Score: 11 tricks turned
  • Just Nom for now Okay, I don't know what demented mind wrote this (I don't check authors before I vote or nominate articles), but it's a stark discourse on human sexuality that deserves to be burned in a fire. I mean read. —rc (t) 00:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For I was thinking of nomming this myself. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:09, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Obligatory For. - You'd have to know the guy it's based on. His theory was that marriage is just prostitution with more expensive gifts and less exciting sex. With a guy like that, the story writes itself. ~ T. (talk) 01:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This is a disgrace to the internet that has infuriated the puritan within me with its tasteless irreverance. That being said, it's a funny funny.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 01:48, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For but it's a shame (for me) this got here just after my self-nom. Ah well. --Ж Kalir yes, I play Pokémon 02:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Ho, the places you'll go!--Procopius 02:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • This is sick, and has "lawsuit" written all over it. Hm, come to think of it, a lawsuit is just what we need to raise our profile. Strong for. InfiniteMonkey 04:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For, and there will be more Dr. Seuss coming soon. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 05:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • 4444!User:Tooltroll/sig 07:44, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • 3. --L 10:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Oh yeaaah. Daddy likee. And who hasn't gotten stiffed by a prostitute? --Anyone 14:04, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

The Demented Cartoon Movie

Score: +3 instances of "Zeeky Boogy Doog"
  • Self nom, For I was waiting for that person on the talk page to nom it, but they haven't, so... eh. I like this bit of my work anyhow. --Ж Kalir yes, I play Pokémon 23:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For I have witnessed this film (in its entirety), so going into this article I knew that it could be pretty bad. But I was pleasantly surprised, as it avoids the sort of humor that made the film so good. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:56, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • 4. --L 10:14, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Minor For very well written, but reeks of Fisher Price Retrospective, but comedy pages about comedies are notoriously difficult, and this one has been well done -- Soul101 Icons-flag-gb~MAREPENT! 11:59, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. --Anyone 13:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


Score: 0
  • Nomination and Strong For. The netsplit bit was the best, even if it was only a few sentences long. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 19:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Hee hee hee... Swordmaster 19:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Agaynst this article...but For wingdings. --Anyone 20:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:45, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Webbish and listy.--Nydas 22:42, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, mostly because I kinda watch it, work on it, and stop people from fixing the lag joke... --epynephrin 03:14, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Hays Code

Score: +12 lewd portrayals of breasts
  • Nom and For - David Gerard 15:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For One of the best article's I've read in a very, very long time. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 16:11, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For I loved it, it made me chuckle. --Nightmare975 21:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • fdasfdsdfsa1dfsadfsforfdsafdsafdsa! --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 02:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For. Creative writing, jokes that jump out of nowhere, just great all around. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 03:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Frankly, my dear, I don't give an against. Therefore, I give a Strong For. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • for, <this comment censored by the MPAA>.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:46, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Really fine writing. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 05:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • 4. --L 06:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ^_^ SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 12:04, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes and Very much Yes. Because maybe if it's on the front page, a hollywood producer will read it and start making Ass-kicking Hippie 2: Pacifist Fury. --Anyone 14:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • "Son, sit down. Once I voted for one of my own articles. I'm not proud of it, but I'd rather you hear it from me than on the playground."--Procopius 02:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


Score: +0 feeling that you've voted against this article before.
  • N4 The best thing about this article is how subtle it is once you actually read it. --L 11:18, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for I'm not sure... it's clever... I guess... but it doesn't strike me as amazingly funny.--T-Roooy 12:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Lord Alvin Redund wants his article back. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 12:33, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. --DW III CUNOUN 13:20, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For an article that I did the majority of. Too bad Rei keeps ruining my humour. Read it again now if you voted against. The for votes were for MY version, not Rei's. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 00:27, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. I've read this article twice, and didn't find it funny. Well, it was AT LEAST twice... maybe more, I'm not sure...--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 01:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • No The ironic twist is that this is not only a redundant version of Redundancy, but also that one might expect to feel Deja-vu having already read redundancy before and then reading this article. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:27, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Comment This is entirely different to Redundancy, which was about hitting you over the head with extremely obvious repetition. Deja-vu is about sneakily quoting the exact same words or phrases over and over. Unlike Redundancy, the best thing about this article is how subtle it is once you actually read it. --L 06:07, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for, only because Redundancy (and Redundancy for that matter) lost all their Redundancy. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 03:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Conditional For. Revert to Cornbread's version.SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 12:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. I don't like either version, and Squiggle is right, it is just the redundancy articled re-redundanted. It isn't subtle when you have three sections exactly the same with the same title. That's just copy and pasting. --Anyone 14:27, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. I think I read something like this: It was called Redundancy. PWND. Swordmaster 20:01, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Comment Okay guys, mentioning Redundancy in this VFH section just became unnecessary. --L 10:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Comment. You might even say it's become redundant to mention rendundant if it is to be said about the redundancy... --Anyone 13:37, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Jackson Pollock

Score: +11 canvas filled with what appear to be the remains of multi-color blooded small creatures
  • N+F. It's all in the name. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 00:01, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Completely uninterested For I would like to state categorically, and for the record, that I had nothing to do with this article. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:03, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, although it bothers me that all the pics say "Vincent Van Gogh" on them...-- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 00:31, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For But I think it still needs some work. Needs to flow a little better, some of the jokes seem kinda random. InfiniteMonkey 04:03, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. An instant laugh. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 06:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • 4. --L 06:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Definitely funny in spots, but the random wackiness gets tiresome as you go on. --So So 07:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
    • comment would it make sense to cut all of section 3, or cut it down to a single paragraph? InfiniteMonkey 17:09, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
      • Comment. Yeah, it was section 3 that made me go from indifferent to against. --So So 02:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Donut Buy One!|F@H|MUN|NS|Please Help Me|. 12:52, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I can't believe you are actually buying this piece of garbage... I mean, sort of for. The Jack Pollock I perceive is someone that makes sculptures out of dead rats, causes people to become violently ill and claims it's all part of the experience, and yes, I think this article is a bit too long and dull. -- The Colonel (talk) 14:56, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For - David Gerard 15:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 11:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I'll be honest...it was the "rabid, frothing vibrator" part that sold me. --Anyone 14:17, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


Score: +5 Beautiful people
  • Stunning rewrite by Monika, has created a wonderful article seemingly out of nothing. Nom and For. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 14:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I agree with Mhaille, one of the better pre- vs post-rewrites I've seen in quite a while.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • So soon? I'm still trying to get used to the fact that it's somewhat done. obligatory self-for --monika 14:04, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I don't get it. Maybe it's not supposed to be funny? It looks very well done though, if that's any consolation for my against. I guess it might be funnier if I ever watched "bleach". --Anyone 15:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I've never watched Bleach, either, but I found this quite funny. Nice Photoshop work in the article, too. Major insignia Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) (17:53, 6 October 2006 (UTC))
  • Against. No. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 00:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Yes. —SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 04:40, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Against. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 06:16, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • God yes. --UNKNOWNFILE 07:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:59, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 06:18, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Commemorative plate

Score: +17 tasteful, elegant additions to any home
  • Self-nom and for - I feel this one deserves a whirl.--Nydas 20:58, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For Great stuff. One suggestion though: change "madam" to "ma'am". It reads smoother and makes the speaker sound like even more of a fast-talking slickster. --Jordanus 21:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For And I like "Madam". It seems more bullshit-respectful than "Ma'am". --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:04, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For! Put me down for a set of 20! Any type will do, I JUST WANT THE DAMN PLATES --So So 03:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I was pleasantly surprised. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 04:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 05:42, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, and I'd like my Thunderbirds plate back now, please.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For.  c • > • cunwapquc? 07:27, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I loved "Why have you got so many plates, granny? You never seem to eat anything." John1728 09:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • 4. --L 10:11, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For - perfect - David Gerard 12:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I went into it decidedly against (cmon, how can this be good?!) and came out decidedly for (why didn't someone think of this sooner?!) --Anyone 12:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For--Shandon 15:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Is funny.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 21:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • You know, for some reason this is what I thought a commemorative plate actually was at first. For. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 23:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For But you mean this isn't what a commemorative plate is? Wonderful article by the way. --T-Roooy 11:10, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For This receives the 'Savant13 award for comedic excellency thanks to Savant13's edits'. --Savant13 17:40, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for. It's great that he author manages to make clear of his/her point in the first few lines, but, yeah, those questions marks kind of put me off a bit. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:23, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The opposition section sold it to me.--Procopius 15:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For Not everybody is able to dream the dream of commemorative plates. Reading this reminds me of guys with red and white striped suits, straw hats, and obnoxiously toothy grins. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Waiting for Godot

Score: +11.5 existential minutes
Comment - although it was funnier when you linked to Waiting For Godot. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  • For I like it. I like it a lot. Also, I fixed the link first...jerkfaces. --Anyone 16:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Procopius 16:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For -One of mine (well, mostly). --Jamtrousers 17:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - Funny, but I'm fucking sick of narrative articles, such as this, this, this, this, possibly this, and definitely this, plus many more. Unoriginality kills. Yawn. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 18:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Ha! --SolarEquinox Icons-flag-us Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! - 19:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, very Pythonesque. --Nydas 19:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For And not just because I added a few jokes. It's a very good representation of a book that, in all honesty, and for all its brilliance, deserves to be lampooned. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:41, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I actually enjoyed this play. Also the "small, green, sentient energy cloud" line is so random that I had to laugh. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 23:00, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Wow, this was funny before, but now it's terrific.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:09, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Agree with EMC. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 04:56, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Blah SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 05:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I wasn't sure it was cooked, but others were - David Gerard 11:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For...I actually laughed instead of just smirking, for once--Shandon 15:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Better than the play itself. -- Hindleyite 17:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Shall I vote for? Yes, I shall (Doesn't vote) -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A
  • Against. When I first looked at it I though, "Man, some stupid IP has vandalised it!" But when I looked at the history, I realised there was no such thing as the "non-vandalised" revision. Self-referencing has long jumped the shark, mate! -- The Colonel (talk) 14:03, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • YOU FOOLS!!! Before you ever, ever call this a load of carp, please actually understand the play. I quote from it:
"Estragon: What about hanging ourselves?
Vladimir: Hmm. It'd give us an erection.
Estragon: (highly excited). An erection!
Vladimir: With all that follows. Where it falls mandrakes grow. That's why they shriek when you pull them up. Did you not know that?
Estragon: Let's hang ourselves immediately!"
Oh, yeah and weak for. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC Icons-flag-gb MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 19:47, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Comment: who called it a load of crap? I think ENeGMA summed up the idea pretty well- respectful lampooning (because no matter how strange, it is an excellent play). --Jamtrousers 20:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For got a kick out of the context, even if I hadn't read the actual thing (play or whatever.)--Witt, Union leader of Union member UNion Entertain me* 05:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I would love to see the parody of this Bekket play with only a mouth speaking, or "Krapp's last tape". Or anything by Ionesco.---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 01:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


Score: +9 transsexual deities
  • SN+F. Just Quasi'd due to stagnation with a +16. Hopefully it still gets the votes, but doesnt get buried on the VFH page this time... -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 04:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Comment. Actually, it was +14, but who's counting? ;)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:14, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For before, For now. May the blessings of the multisexual deity be upon you.--Procopius 15:52, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Solid Gold

Score: +11 blasphemers stoned
  • SN+F. A well deserved satirical poke in the eye for Shari'a Law.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. It's alright, but not what I'd call feature quality. And isn't this like the fifth self-nom you've done recently? Wizstaff2The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black MageWizstaff [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]Icons-flag-gbI am not a waffle.Icons-flag-gb 06:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
    Um, no. It's the third, ever. Unless you mean VFP, then yes, I am a nom whore.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For on effort, at the least - David Gerard 09:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I enjoyed it. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 14:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For You voted against me because of self nom's once...you're slowly degenerated into a common vote whore.-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 15:52, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
    Comment/apology on your talkpage.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:10, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For Modus = Very funny. And I certainly don't mind self noms - I does them meself, in facts I does. Look at French Revolution or HowTo:Skip School. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Great idea. For. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 01:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 05:52, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Another article from the brilliant mind of Modusoperandi. --Hhamdy283 00:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, again. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 18:31, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For.... eh, what the hell --The Llama Llover
  • For. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 06:22, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. I don't know what it is I'm not getting; apparently, it's the part of the article that the "funny" comes from. --Kwakerjak 23:57, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
    Comment. It's satire. As such it's more "Ah", rather than "Moo ha-ha!". Well, bits are "Moo ha-ha!", but only if you aren't right in the head. Which some of us aren't. Moo ha-ha...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I laughed. I confess I don't understand the show's tie-in to fundamentalist Islam, but I laughed all the same, which is a sign of quality.--Procopius 16:01, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

But Seriously...

Score: +14.5
  • LOL after subtlety. Nom and For - David Gerard 10:23, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Heh. --L 10:44, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • A very dry For.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:08, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Very for. We need more articles of such high quality. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 14:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Oh dear Lord this is funny...--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:39, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR! But seriously though, it's one of the best articles currently up for featuring. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For because life is futile.-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 15:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Definitely for. Funny stuff. ----SolarEquinox Icons-flag-us Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! - 16:00, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Not front-page funny, but what it lacks in hilarity (which it does) it makes up for in creativity and well-thought-out-ness (which it has a lot of). And also I've been giving out a lot of "Against" lately so it's time to mix it up. --Anyone 20:09, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Random and pointless. - User:Guest/sig 05:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. But seriously...SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 06:19, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:41, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For John1728 10:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For Hardwick Fundlebuggy does it again! And this time is once too much. I've called the proper authorities on you, sir, and with any luck you'll be in the slammer by midnight. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For This article is unique to me in the fact that it is the first article by someone else that I like so much that I wish that I had written it. OK, maybe Fisher Price: A Retrospective. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Señor DiZtheGreat Cuba flag large CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 18:18, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Same reasoning as my vote on the Godot one. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 05:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Definitively FOR. Speaking of defining stuff, did you find all those synonyms/similar words for serious in a thesaurus? Bloody good stuff, though. Wizstaff2The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black MageWizstaff [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]Icons-flag-gbI am not a waffle.Icons-flag-gb 23:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This was the first article I wrote here and yes, a thesaurus is a handy thing. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 13:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Another nice looking article by HF... But seriously, I'd rather read a thesuarus page by page, from cover to cover, than paragraphs of pure vocabulary mixed in a pot of pointless drivels. -- Colonel Swordman, currently under the influence of Red Shirts effect, 14:26, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for.If a grown man wants to run around in giant shoes throwing custard at voles, then fine. But let him do it in the privacy of his own home and under cover of darkness." I laughed at this line, and this garners a weak for, because I actaully laughed.--Witt, Union leader of Union member UNion Entertain me* 05:58, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

French Revolution

Score: +12 to face Le Guillotine
  • Self Nom + For Maybe because Pee Review failed me, or because of the euphoric, drunken feeling of power that comes with having written a featured article, but I wanna see how this article does. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It was a vote for, it was a vote against. Oh wait, it was a vote For. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 04:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Content isnt that funny...-- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 05:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I giggled. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Aww, someone already made a Tale of Two Cities joke...--Ginchael 14:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Good show. SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 14:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I loved it. Wizstaff2The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black MageWizstaff [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]Icons-flag-gbI am not a waffle.Icons-flag-gb 15:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • What's French for For? Freemorpheme.gif 07:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: Pour. Contre is Against, but you really wouldn't want to use that, now would you? -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 14:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For Erastus Brigham Bigelow. --So So 10:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For - David Gerard 10:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Nay. I just don't feel like it had It, know what I'm saying? Of course you don't, I'm being too vague. --Anyone 20:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For-Well done.--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 15:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, if only because I managed to defy all odds and actually contribute something mildly amusing to Uncyclopedia (even if it's just a footnote), and I'm so desperate for attention it's pathetic. --Kwakerjak 19:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Brilliant! ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 21:47, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR (thank you very much) if you liked THAT, you should check out mcdonalds. That place is so very legal...I hope.-EnvyOfBobBarker october 5 2006
  • For It made me laugh. Viva la France! Haha

Pontius Pilot

Score: +11.5 crucified voters
  • Comment. Mr Mayfair, was there a reason you deleted my vote? --Anyone 16:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment It was probably just a mistake since Tom voted for several articles in one big edit. Yours got lost. I've restored it below. —rc (t) 16:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Ah, here here. All's well that ends as well as it started out, no weller or less well than before. Thanks. --Anyone 12:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It is too short, but what's there is so damn well thought out and put together I can't say no. --Anyone 14:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. If it's expanded etc etc... Freemorpheme.gif 07:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For - David Gerard 10:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Humorous.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For and Against people who vote down articles based solely on their length. —rc (t) 20:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For and Against Anyone who votes down articles based solely on their length.-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 05:17, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Comment. Boooo. That is all. --Anyone 12:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Martin Van Buren

Score: +19 presidents not on any greenbacks
  • Nomination and For. Funny, article, plenty of people working on it, and the pictures add to the effect quite nicely. I don't know. You either hate this page, or you think it's a riot. --The Llama Llover
  • Against. It's not good enough for a front-page article. Like, this one time, we were out at this roller rink. He went up to this girl and was like, "Hey, do you wanna go get a burger or something?" And she said yes, but then she totally blew him off. Later, I asked her why she did it and she said it was because he looked like shit. It's true. That's what Martin Van Buren looks like. That is frikkin' colloquial. --thematrixeætsyou, the ^_^ (talk) (flames) 05:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For - wasn't this nominated before? This is really good - David Gerard 09:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah, and I liked it better when it didn't have the parts on Star Trek, squirrels and phone calls, but still for. --So So 09:58, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. I nominated this before; it was on VFH for over a month but never got any traction. Let it remain Quasi-Featured.--Procopius 11:44, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It's good, not great, but that screen watching part is fuckin awesome. Fuckin screen watchers. --Anyone 12:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for. I chuckled. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Brad removed this a while ago, because of stagnation. It's a Quasi... -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 22:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I need the diff for an unsigned vote to count. —rc (t) 22:24, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I don't recall if I voted for or against this article the first time around. Actually, I don't even recall if I voted on it the first time around. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 20:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For I love it.--Bladetip 21:19, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment- This article has been changed a lot since the last nomination. Please take a chance to look at it before you automatically vote against it. --The Llama Llover
  • For... yeah, it's ok, maybe a little work is needed, but it's still good --User:Lolster884
  • For the second time. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 07:05, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I tweaked it a bit, but only a little. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:18, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Quasi, Quasi, Quasi!!!SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 14:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Hmmmmmmm.... no. Freemorpheme.gif 15:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I love it. --Hhamdy283 20:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I was going to vote against, but the tweaks have put it over the edge into for territory. 15Mickey20 20:25, 30 September
  • For And as for the guy above me, if tweaks would change your mind one way or the other, you shouldn't vote at all. Savant13 21:15, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

2006 (UTC)

  • Comment. Before the changes, it was a good idea, but had little to do with Martin Van Buren. The added references to his political career nullified my objections (as well as making it funnier) and made it forworthy. 15Mickey20 12:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For I liked it before, but the changes made it hilarious. --Onion 00:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, but dude, Llama Llover? You made so many edits! You should just rough-draft everything into a document and then post it instead of changing it every single time you see some little thing wrong... --Just Joshin' Ya!
  • For Good work. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Abstain. Changed my mind because of changes in article. The changes would have been good if it were any other page, but to me the charm to this particular article was in how it gave next to no reference to the actual person's life. --So So 01:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
    • For and Comment. Actually, I have kind of come up with something crazy with The Llama Llover and I don't know if you like it or not. Well, we are all silly people, right? :) But, yeah, I think the changes are a bit over the top and have kind of adulterated the original flavour of the humor. Shame on Hardwick FundleBuggy. -- The Colonel (talk) 05:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For lol, i couldnt stop laughing. star trek? puh-lease --Running with scissors
  • For. Much better with refences to the actual person.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 15:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For As if the original article wasn't enough, a hate template created on the side is like another cake made of icing. Icons-flag-us Love:M.D
  • OH MY GOD HARDWICK MADE IT FUNNY! User:Wehpudicabok/sig 22:25, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against It failed already, yes? --Jordanus 17:32, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For good show --User:Stoopid - no timestamp
  • for this was almost featured last time, but i didnt vote for it. so now i am. --Hooplah!!!
  • Against. HTBSANJF in its finest. - User:Guest/sig 05:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Still one of my favorites, anyway.  c • > • cunwapquc? 07:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • ForSir Mandaliet CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 18:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For Very, very funny. A hatred on a personal level with intermitent historical references. Good job. --Thetanmancan 22:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For I suppose... -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:52, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For I thought I've voted on this one, well I read it a while ago, deja vu all over again.--Witt, Union leader of Union member UNion Entertain me* 05:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Washington and Lafayette

Score: +15 comedy acts written
  • Self-nom and for. Coming to a theater near you.--Procopius 12:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 12:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for. I like it, but I don't know why. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:27, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For YES.--Ginchael 00:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I have no idea what the joke is, but it is beautifully laid out which gives me the Pot Noodle horn. I could look at it all day. Freemorpheme.gif 20:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For, Procopius makes history come alive.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For maintaining the morale of the young republic, I vote yes.--Rljenk 01:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 11:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For ...better than most...though the pic of 'em both togethah could use an upgrade--Shandon 04:58, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I enjoyed the echoes of all the different classic comedy teams. --User:SolarEquinox/sig 20:49, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It's like a fine tooled Queen Ann. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 12:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Classy. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 22:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For Very creative. --Thetanmancan 03:29, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 23:51, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Fuck. I forgot to vote for this. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 06:28, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Close but not quite. It's very well written, flows well, follows a narrative arc and uses images well. However, it needs two or three places that just make me laugh, or at least chuckle. InfiniteMonkey 04:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


Score: +15 centipoofs on the Gaydar
  • nom and for. I thought this was pretty funny and the graphic is genius, and it's got the potential to be even better. For instance, there must be some kind of gaydar jamming system, right?InfiniteMonkey 23:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for -- I'll change my vote to For after I make a few touch-ups. Note to all: halt voting on this submission until I've fixed it up a bit (nothing serious; just some minor tunings). Or not. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 23:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
I'm done, and for. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 23:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Against. Short and no laughs. The pic is good though. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 23:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thanks :) --Huffers 02:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong for. This is a funny. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 00:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Very Strong For. Not that it makes any difference, adding strength. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • A For so strong, its almost butch. I gave this one a good going over too. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong for, nice and edgy, good content balance, great puns.. yeah funny !.--Vosnul 10:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Reluctant For. Ok, fine, I'll vote for this gay-themed article, but this is the last one I'm voting for for a while.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For in a ruggedly heterosexual manner - David Gerard 12:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I don't care for the article, but the Gaydiation image made me laugh... You should VFP that one! --Mindsunwound: (MUN) Heterocidal Tendencies Cat-bw3 Man Babies 2cents.PNG 20:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Sure. References to Buckyballs and that mysterious siren in Vanilla Sky secured my vote. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Indeed yes. After I had snorted out big laughter-chunks at the image, the rest of the article fell into place. Freemorpheme.gif 09:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The humor is obvious and deserves to be noticed.--SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 15:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For: funny, and made me pull out my old Palm to see if http://www.freewarepalm.com/mature/gaydardeluxe_v22a.shtml still worked. --User:Falcotron/sig 01:42, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Yesses.' Mostly for the Gaydiation picture. Dumitru 01:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • No thank you -Heh heh funny, but not enough for VFH. The picture is gold, though. --Señor DiZtheGreat Cuba flag large CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 21:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Against IMO, it just doesn't have that classic burning sarcasm that some of my favorites have. --Atomsk.gif Kaizer the Bjorn takkun Takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 03:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For because it was started by a friend of mine --Huffers 20:07, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For but I'm not for Gay marriage for straight people. -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 00:25, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For Gaydiation. LOL --Savant13 21:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • sorta For takes a concept and runs with it but maybe wants trimming a bit. A little tumescent for my tastes. Pewpewpew 02:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 22:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Thetanmancan 03:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Gay. --So So 06:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Learn Hebrew

Score: Torahs misread +19
  • Nom and For. A great one from Mordillo. Possibly the most abusive and erudite HowTo. And it's got this line: The proper way to pronounce this letter is take a nut and shove it down your throat as far down as possible and then observe the sounds you make as you try to cough it out. Got it? There is your Chet.--Procopius 23:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It's not Mordillo's best work, but that doesn't mean it's not hilarious. P.S., Mordillo, can I have a picture of you for the Self-hating Jew article? --User:Falcotron/sig 00:21, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • ([[Talk:HowTo:Learn Hebrew#From VFH|discussion continued...]])
Only if it's a book for children or poetry, or for beginners. Trust me we don't write the vowels 99% of the time.---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 14:26, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Sorry, only made me laugh once. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 05:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Cornbread is one laugh ahead of me. "A" for effort, though.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC) For, it's grown on me.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Not featureworthy, because. --ZniLe 12:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
commentWhich was always a good reason...-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 18:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Language humor is the best.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 19:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Damn and i actually tried learning Hebrew... too funny.--Lutskovp 20:01, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For. I already know Hebrew, which made this article even more funny! Bravo to the creator!! (besides, I even helped out with some modifications) --User:Llama-Llover
  • For. I don't know a lick of Hebrew, but after reading this I'll act like I do. Nice addition of sound files, too. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 06:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For. I love this article. It pokes fun at the native English speakers (namely, me) and the picture at the end with Windows in Hebrew was hilarious. --User:Armodeus
  • Against While I like this article and appreciate the effort and humour involved, it's just a bit too angsty for my tastes and certainly not feature-quality, sadly. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 03:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:12, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For An orgasmically conundroumousifacilicious escapade. Bravo. -- 21:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC) Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) Icons-flag-ie-Icons-flag-us KUN SEXY WH
  • For Quite, quite funny. --Thetanmancan 06:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Kinda messy and not that funny. --Jordanus 14:34, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against its just not funny --Hooplah!!!!
  • For -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 17:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For- I thought dabbling in ancient hebrew would be worth a chuckle, how terribly wrong I was. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by Weasel3689 (talk • contribs)
  • Comment diffrc (t) 06:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Kwakerjak 12:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 23:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Previously Featured

Rorschach Inkblot Acid Test

Score: +22 Disorders Diagnosed

Featuredrc (t) 06:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Self-nomination. OK, as far as Swiss psychiatrists go, everyone knows Jung. But Hermann Rorschach deserves a bit of recognition. Plus, I did a great deal of field research on this one. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 12:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
  • +1 For hilariousness--Savant13 14:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Shandon 18:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I looked at this while it was in progress, and almost felt obliged to nominate it myself. Great work Immy! -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 21:02, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For I see a beautiful lady in that inkblot. -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 22:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Great mix of dumb puns, brilliant satire, and silly drug references; what more could you want? Oh, pictures. They rock too. --Falcotron 06:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For all my childhood issues rushing back into my head.--Procopius 11:42, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Once again, Immy comes through with the cerebral hahas. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:38, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
  • for, it's a trip. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:41, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Absolute-Lookatthebirdie!! --Donut Buy One!|F@H|MUN|NS|Please Help Me|. 20:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
  • A butterfly on a flower. Why are we bothering to vote? Just feature it instantly. Freemorpheme.gif 13:16, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Love it. Very, very clever. I'll have what you're having. -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 07:09, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Good heavens, feature this immediately. It's hilarious. --Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 01:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Nice!  c • > • cunwapquc? 02:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. What an excellent community evaluation this has been. Psychologically adorable. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:31, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I save this from stagnation! User:Wehpudicabok/sig 19:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Jeez, how come I never voted for this before now? -- Hindleyite 20:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For I thought I had already voted for this. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 15:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Not to be a nay-sayer, but I just don't find this very funny. It seems more random than it does funny. I do like the pictures, though. --Thetanmancan 06:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Against I agree--Jordanus 17:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I just finished reading Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test.. great book, almost as good as this. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 01:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This is pretty awesome. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 22:01, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For! Egad, so many obscure blue links! --L 10:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Kwakerjak 12:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For out, man because, like dude, it changed colors and then went all kind of blurry. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 12:55, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 23:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)


Awards, Decorations and Honours
Awards2 Awards Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Admin Rank · Ninjastars
Ranks &
Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the moment
Potatochopper of the Month

Foolitzer Prize
Writer of the Year · Uncyclopedian of the Year · RadicalX of the Year
RYA · User Space Affiliations · Past Winners

Limelight VFH · VFP · Best of · Top Ten: 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · Hall of Shame
Prix citron Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year · Sandwich of the Month · FFS
Events citron Poo Lit Suprise · Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball · The Article Whisperer
Happy Monkey Competition · Other competitions
Personal tools