Vote for an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
Unsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button () above the edit box.
You may nominate and vote for your own articles if you so choose - please note it on your nomination.
When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the entry using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
THIS IS A VOTE, NOT A DISCUSSION.
If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it HERE.
Violators of this policy will be SHOT.
Survivors will be GIVEN A DIGESTIVE BISCUIT.
Then we shoot them again.
Any funny business and we shoot you a third time.
If you think I'm kidding, go ahead and test my patience.
I love you.
(if you read aloud the fine print above, your dog will also be shot)
Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )
SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must be at least a week old before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time.
VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.
VFH IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
Nom and for. Maybe I am really pushing for this, but I would really like to see the article featured. It was the work of 50+ individuals over a period of one year, and 1000+ hours were spent with all blood, sweat and tears... Meh, what the heck! Just sit down and enjoy the article, and don't forget to vote! -- The Colonel(talk) 14:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
For, I've got a soft spot for Australia. Right there. Don't poke it! Now it's all bruised! --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 15:02, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Nomination and For - another that made me laugh at work and lose my job - David Gerard 12:38, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
For - This is the work of a true great - and if you don't get it now, brother, you never will. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy(Bleat) 13:09, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
A-Nom-ynous and For. Somewhat short but hilarious biography of a...fire hydrant :(? Zanno 06:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC) -Unsigned, Nom doesnt count, should be removed. -- Sir CHolla | CUN 05:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
There, I registered. Happy? Zanno 06:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Against. 07:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Against. It was nice, but boring and unexceptional. John1728 10:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
For - I laughed out loud. Last line is a winnah - David Gerard 11:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
For - Since, like a hydrant, my penis gushes when properly manipulated Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN•Eh?•Oh!•UnTunes!•• I my cat! 19:39, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
For - I like this, it's so completely different from anything I'd do. --Nydas 19:45, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I'd say it borders on a tremendous shaggy dog story, but fire hydrant's aversion to dogs, shaggy or not, and their profoundly misguided sprinklings will not allow me. Excellent subtlety, not boredom, abounds. -- Imrealized...hmm? 19:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Against Why? It's retarded. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 21:48, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
This is not retarded. All you have to do is read it the whole way through (the WHOLE WAY THROUGH, mind you), and then after you've read the last line, read it all again. Then suddenly it's the funniest thing you've ever read. I think. For. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 22:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
I change my mind. Definitely Not retarded, and actually pretty amusing. Strong For--§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 00:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Not the funniest article in the world, but I reward cleverness. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 05:53, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
For I thought it was retarded until I did what, ahem, 'Weppy, the Wehpudicabok' said, at which point it became funny, and certainly VFH-worthy. TheFreed MindSutoththeBlack Mage[FACEHOLE HERE][MUN][YvJP]I am not a pastry. 11:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
For. This is a very useful piece of information, and I will need it in the future. Well, not really. But yeah, great article. --Thematrixeatsyou 23:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Nominated and for Absolutely hilarious. The dialect is exactly like how people speak in Boston. I'd know. I live there. It made me laugh so hard I cried. --Thetanmancan 02:36, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Obligatory for. --KATIE!! 03:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I don't think it's very funny, but the time it must of taken to write all that in a Boston accent is commendable. --Anyone 19:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
For I remember when this was written. It also gives me flashbacks of some train driver at the station in Boston near the airport asking me something in an accent so thick that I didn't comprehend I was being talked to until he tried again more slowly after I realized it was something sort of like English, but not really. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 04:46, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Against for yet a second time (presumably for the same reasons). --DW III 18:27, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
For. You don't want to mess with me. I've got a hammer. --Jordanus 16:35, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Laughed out loud at it while I was meant to be working earlier this week. Not sure about the biology bit though.15Mickey20 19:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I like how it refuses to consider any constructive use for the tool.--Procopius 12:54, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
"The hammer's scientific name is Hammerius hitticus, which is obviously a bland and misguided attempt to write something hammer-related in a vaguely Latinate manner." How could you not vote for? --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 19:37, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Score: +8 naked Scottish librarians dumped in favour of killer bees
Nom and For Yet another masterpiece by the master of British film, Sir Mhaille. It got everything needed for a smash hit - sex, violence, scots, Christopher Lee and killer bees. In fact, I wish to god I'd seen this version and not the actual one...--Brigadier Sir MordilloGUNUotYWotMFPUotMAotMMI3AnotMVFH+S 09:39, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I'm voting for this now before he has a chance to hassle me on IRC. -- Sir CodeineK·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:42, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Weak Against. Its funny, and I hate voting against Mhaille, but its just too short. Havent seen the movie either... -- Sir CHolla | CUN 04:52, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Against Sorry, didn't get me. It is mildly amusing, at best. Not deletion material, but not feature either. It also loses something later on. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 03:55, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I have no idea what the joke is, but it is beautifully laid out which gives me the Pot Noodle horn. I could look at it all day. 20:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
For, Procopius makes history come alive.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 20:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
For maintaining the morale of the young republic, I vote yes.--Rljenk 01:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Nom and for. Not only is this the best-written article on the site, but it's also quite funny. Also, maybe if we feature this, some people will read it.--<<>> 21:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
For because people need to read it and they don't. --~
Comment, "Single Text Page seeks nice User for pictures. No fatties."--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 23:19, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Noperoo. 10-4, over and out big daddy. ~ T. (talk) 23:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
For Because of brilliant lines like "Erik Estrada is an interstellar Cherzgon warrior who was aborted by his mother during the third week of pregnancy." Man, we really need more humor like that on Uncyc. --SirENeGMA(talk)GUNWotMPLS 01:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Against. It's actually quite funny and well-written, but does a policy count as an article?--Procopius 02:04, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Probably not. But it doesn't matter. Euroipods wasn't an article either, but we know how that turned out. --SirENeGMA(talk)GUNWotMPLS 02:40, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
For 'cause I added that Wilde quote (which is acctaully based of a real quote by Mr. Wilde). --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 03:09, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Against, why? one word - Rodney Dangerfield - --HPtalk 03:37, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Against. No way. -- Sir CHolla | CUN 03:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
"If someone types in "Harry Potter"...they want to read a humorous slant on Harry Potter, not an article on a Dutch mink farmer with laser-beam eyes." Hear, hear. --L 14:13, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
For, as per everyone else who voted "for". ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:05, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Against Just put a link next to the Beginners Guide, Style Guide, Big Five, Questions, Donations button.--Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 19:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
For, because it starts with an Oscar quote, has a Chuck roundhouse pic, uses the word "gay" three times in one sentence, and escalates weasels down Australia's pants. --!!!??? 00:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
For, all the IP articles that weren't started because of reading HTBANJS. --SonicChaoBabbel!Contribs 00:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
For. It may not be as funny/witty/crap as the other articles we feature, but this is certainly one of our best pieces of work, and as I recall VFH is for our best work, not funniest. TheFreed MindSutoth IndartheBlack Mage[MUN][YvJP] 07:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
"Weak For'. It honestly should be in the HowTo namespace. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 21:07, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Not just a great article on how to write on Uncyclopedia, but also a great article in of itself, even if it isn't helpful. ---Stevo the Human, now with an article!!
Positive Reinforcement. In smaller words, yes.--Wit (tawk) 07:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment, I love this article and fully support it being featured, especially since it helped (and amused) me so much as a lowly noob. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]MUNCMNSF@H (drivel) 13:48, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I had only skim-read it before, because I know I'm funny (my mother tells me so). I didn't realise how hilarious it is. It's one of the best things on the site. 15Mickey20 20:11, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Maybe someone will actually read it if it's featured. Swordmaster 16:29, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
That's a *NEGATORY* good buddy...policy ought not to be VFH--Shandon 04:59, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Against; much too fact-laden for featurability. --DW III 11:54, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
85% for, 15% undecided. Why isn't this featured? It is one of the most important pages on the site. --Cs1987 15:11, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For Think of this as the article that launched 1000 features. --Onion 19:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Nom and ForInfiniteMonkey 19:49, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
If a user votes for in a VFH section, and no one's around to see the edit made, was it actually there the whole time? --cdr.thetoastmantlkctrcunf@h 20:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Weak against. Ok, but not quite. -- Sir CHolla | CUN 21:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Is the glass half For or half Against? I changed my philosophy--Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 04:00, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
For, because it reminds me of a philosophy teacher (boo!), and it was funny (unlike that philosophy teacher. Again, boo!)--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 07:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Winnah! For - David Gerard 12:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Why not, Kate Winslet? Love the Heraclitus section. -- Imrealized...hmm? 05:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
It's attractive, well put together, thought-out. But not funny. Needs trimming, like Diogenes' nosehair. So, no. 09:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
For. It fully actualizes its potential as my senses act upon it and create the image of Philosophy in my mind. But then, what do we really know?--Procopius 15:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I agree with Procopius.-- 15:13, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
To vote For, or not to vote For? That is the question. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:34, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Still, I'd love to see mention Plato's treatise on pederasty from The Disgorgias, entitled "Fuck You, Socrates." --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:27, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
For, because I actually had a funny philosophy teacher. --!!!??? 01:46, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
nom and for. I thought this was pretty funny and the graphic is genius, and it's got the potential to be even better. For instance, there must be some kind of gaydar jamming system, right?InfiniteMonkey 23:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Weak for -- I'll change my vote to For after I make a few touch-ups. Note to all: halt voting on this submission until I've fixed it up a bit (nothing serious; just some minor tunings). Or not. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 23:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Very Strong For. Not that it makes any difference, adding strength. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
A For so strong, its almost butch. I gave this one a good going over too. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy(Bleat) 08:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Strong for, nice and edgy, good content balance, great puns.. yeah funny !.--Vosnul 10:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Reluctant For. Ok, fine, I'll vote for this gay-themed article, but this is the last one I'm voting for for a while.--<<>> 14:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
For in a ruggedly heterosexual manner - David Gerard 12:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment I don't care for the article, but the Gaydiation image made me laugh... You should VFP that one! --Mindsunwound: (NS) Torture Water Vacuum 20:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Sure. References to Buckyballs and that mysterious siren in Vanilla Sky secured my vote. -- Imrealized...hmm? 05:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Indeed yes. After I had snorted out big laughter-chunks at the image, the rest of the article fell into place. 09:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
For. The humor is obvious and deserves to be noticed.-- 15:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Self-nom and for, because my rabbi and former Hitler Youth leader says the truth must come out about the Protocols, even though They will never let me work in Hollywood again for this. --!!!??? 22:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
For, Oi! I should bring you some matzo ball soup, maybe. I make the shmura matzo myself. Have some, you'll plotz.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 02:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Weak for. The text is fine, but as InfiniteMonkey said, the pictures (with the exception of the Mordillo one) could use some work. The Lieberman one seemed like a non-sequitor to me.--Procopius 12:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Weak for, for the same reason as Procopius and unfortunately I've been a bit short on time to try and help. The writing is top-notch, though. Have you tried Image Request? -- Imrealized...hmm? 06:42, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Although I would like to see the opposite version of this article. Sometimes accusations of "self-hating-jewishness" are ridiculously true and funny.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 20:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Against Very weak article. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 03:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
'OMFG WTF DONT MAKE FUN OF JEWS IST NTO FUNNYYYY!!!!--64.166.145.2 22:17, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Against.Just 'cause something does not translate into any official language DOES NOT MAKE IT FUNNY. I mean, easy on the jibberish, ya mean? GRUNG! -Unsigned. -- Sir CHolla | CUN 20:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
For, I wish it was a bit longer, but still wonderful--Sir ClaudiusCUNVFH (carpe diem) 19:50, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment. Thanks for the vote. It's true, (as Falcotron noted as well) it's short. I think I ran out of ideas. Either that, or historiography is the bitch child of comedy. :)--Procopius 21:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Another fun historical romp courtesy of Procopius. -- Imrealized...hmm? 06:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
For It could be better...but I do have a weakness for this sort of humor. —rc(t) 03:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Nom and For. A great one from Mordillo. Possibly the most abusive and erudite HowTo. And it's got this line: The proper way to pronounce this letter is take a nut and shove it down your throat as far down as possible and then observe the sounds you make as you try to cough it out. Got it? There is your Chet.--Procopius 23:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
For. It's not Mordillo's best work, but that doesn't mean it's not hilarious. P.S., Mordillo, can I have a picture of you for the Self-hating Jew article? --!!!??? 00:21, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Nice. Nearly as much fun as deliberately mixing up your salaams and shaloms in Jerusalem. -- Sir Armando PerentieKUNFP 04:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
For. And I should say that there ARE vowels in Hebrew. We put them under our letters. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 00:00, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Only if it's a book for children or poetry, or for beginners. Trust me we don't write the vowels 99% of the time.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 14:26, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Against. Sorry, only made me laugh once. -- Sir CHolla | CUN 05:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Against Cornbread is one laugh ahead of me. "A" for effort, though.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 23:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Against Not featureworthy, because. --ZniLe 12:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Language humor is the best.--<<>> 19:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Damn and i actually tried learning Hebrew... too funny.--Lutskovp 20:01, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Strong For. I already know Hebrew, which made this article even more funny! Bravo to the creator!! (besides, I even helped out with some modifications) --User:Llama-Llover
For. I don't know a lick of Hebrew, but after reading this I'll act like I do. Nice addition of sound files, too. -- Imrealized...hmm? 06:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Strong For. I love this article. It pokes fun at the native English speakers (namely, me) and the picture at the end with Windows in Hebrew was hilarious. --User:Armodeus
Against While I like this article and appreciate the effort and humour involved, it's just a bit too angsty for my tastes and certainly not feature-quality, sadly. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 03:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
For <chugs beer> Thanks to the collaboration (with Shandon) to make this page I've got <belch!> culture. <pumps fist> Cul-chur! Cul-chur! Cul-chur! Wooo, Skynyrd rules! --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 21:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
For, even though these "tough turkeys" Hindleyite speaks of intrigue me. I'll take two of 'em so I can stage fights in my backyard. Do you take PayPal? -- Imrealized...hmm? 04:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
For. The whole thing is brilliant, but Gilbert accusing <insert name here> is the best meta I've ever seen on Uncyclopedia. --!!!??? 19:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment. HA! Didn't notice that before. I'm flattered.--Procopius 20:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC) And fooled, too. Still, excellent.--Procopius 20:05, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Against. I agree with MoneySign. Even though it's not real redlinks it still gives me nightmares.-- 06:23, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment Gilbert & Sullivan's text is like Red Vs Blue (as in Halo or the USA). Too obscure?--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 16:19, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
For! Spectacular - David Gerard 15:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
If For no other reason than the tremendous amount of time spent on this. Hard to put together. -- Sir CHolla | CUN 04:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Against. It's too much of an in-joke. InfiniteMonkey 09:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment as I've said before, I don't see it as all that in-jokey. When it comes down to it, it's Pinafore with color commentary from G&S. The poster-pic and the Potato are incidental to the story.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 10:04, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
For Give me hope, and what I lack in education and polite accomplishments, that I will endeavour to acquire. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy(Bleat) 08:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
For 't Is absorutery blilriant! --di Mario 20:45, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
weak against. I could tell it was funny, but only after reading wikipedia and learning what the hell it was satirising. I'll take this back if I learn that I'm the only one here who has never heard of HMS Pinnafore.--Gubby 20:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
N+F My second favourite entry in Poo Lit--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 15:46, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
For My second favorite entry too--Shandon 18:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
For. A wide variety of humor without ever becoming random and stupid. I mean, it uses "set us up the bomb" and is nevertheless funny. That's a rare thing, to be treasured. Plus, other than a small part of the US (and the entire world outside the US, of course), everyone calls it "Mac & Cheese" and has no idea what "Kraft Dinner" is--which just makes it funnier. --Falcotron 21:59, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
For -- Funny, but could use some minor touch-ups. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 00:17, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
For. Sports writing isn't just about the scores -- there has to be an equine interest element as well. -- Sir Armando PerentieKUNFP 08:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Weak against. Tough for me, because I'm a fan of Shandon'swork, and I genuinely like the ending of this piece. If there was more detail about the horse's career, I'd swing the other way.--Procopius 14:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Self-nomination. OK, as far as Swiss psychiatrists go, everyone knows Jung. But Hermann Rorschach deserves a bit of recognition. Plus, I did a great deal of field research on this one. -- Imrealized...hmm? 12:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
+1 For hilariousness--Savant13 14:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
For. I looked at this while it was in progress, and almost felt obliged to nominate it myself. Great work Immy! -- Sir CHolla | CUN 21:02, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
For. Great mix of dumb puns, brilliant satire, and silly drug references; what more could you want? Oh, pictures. They rock too. --Falcotron 06:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
For all my childhood issues rushing back into my head.--Procopius 11:42, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Self-Nom and For. Well, it didnt win the PLS, but I still think its feature-quality, and hope you all do too. I thank RadX and Modusoperandi for the lovely pics. -- Sir CHolla | CUN 03:21, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
For my favourite article of the PLS.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 03:38, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
ARRRGH! self-nommer beat me to it!!! For--I thought this was gonna be the winner--Shandon 06:31, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Against. I tried to laugh at this but didn't succeed. Maybe it's just not outrageously funny enough. Maybe I just need to go and take up somking bong. Anyway, I will have a look at this again and see if it's really feature-worthy. -- The Colonel(talk) 07:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Against' I could have swore I voted against this once already... Maybe I'm just making that up. Who knows. --SirENeGMA(talk)GUNWotMPLS 18:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Against I didn't laugh-it's not funny enough to be in teh featured list. --KUK nerd 05:52, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Quasi self nom and for a big rewrite on the lonely shore of existential fumbling --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy(Bleat) 07:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
For...yeah this was a really hard descission there is so many of them...umm....GO VOYNICH ONE ALSO....alright...here's another one for you Hardwick The HRH MuCal. TayorMUN (Praise!) (CMC!)
For...careful, I think only truly cultured people are gonna get this one... --HPtalk 16:12, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Missed this one too.....still think you should have the Munch Bunch! -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 17:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
For, and I quote: "Edvard spent his later years looking forward to death with sheer terror while curled up in a corner of his room, under a sheet." --DonutBuy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 21:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
For I'm cultured! I'm cultured! --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A21:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
For. If anyone wants to buy a Munch, I know a guy who knows a guy. -- Imrealized...hmm? 03:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Against i dont get it--Parodius 22:31, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Self Nomination - I have worked on it for some days and it's time for it now to face the final test. (I have removed most of the comments I posted here. See discussion page for more details.)-- The Colonel(talk) 12:10, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
What the hell is wrong with u ppl? Saw this when it was under development and liked it then. For. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 15:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
For - I liked it. It's not very often that an article up for nomination mentions a recently featured article (Idiocrates). Plus it was funny. --emc! ╬ 20:58, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
For. Took me a while to decide, because it was kinda confusing the first time I read it, but after re-reading, its funny and the images are good. -- Sir Cornbread The Great[SHOUT][MUN][GET THIS FEATURED!] 05:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
For, because I'm one of the poor bastards that bought a Pentium Pro and I'm still holding a grudge. Modusoperandi 00:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
For. Cleverly done. This is why I own a Compaq. Wait a minute . . .--Procopius 12:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
For. This is a sympathy vote for a nice try. Seriously, WTF is this (see [1])? Go to Hades? That's some funny shit there Swordman. So is this article. I've no sympathy at all, actually. -- Imrealized...hmm? 05:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
For...I never owned a dog named Patches, thusly go Smackintosh! --HPtalk 05:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
For because it hasn't gotten a single Against yet, and because it needs to be featured eventually. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 20:47, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Weak For It doesn't have the same comedic punch as some of the other stuff I've read, but it has some nice jokes. I especially like the "Four Least Efforts." --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 20:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Against. Why did I vote for this originally? Maybe to get rid of Swordman...I do like the pics, but it didnt make me laugh once. -- Sir CHolla | CUN 22:21, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Hey, I worked hard on it! -- The Colonel(talk) 14:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
For I'm killing a few birds with one stone by editing this whole page, instead of each section. Take that WIKIBirds!--Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 21:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For. It is rare that I find, on a site such as this, an article that is so useful. Thank you Hardwick. You changed my life. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy(Bleat) 07:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
For. 'Tis Hardwick, 'tis good.--Procopius 12:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)