Score: 0 satanic scientists

1. Nom & For I thought it was pretty funny, the pictures weren't too bad either.

1. Against Too much use of the {{c}} Comprende?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 3 dissenting justices

1. Nom & For I think this is one of the best ones I've written. It was pee reviewed and got a comment, in case anyone was wondering about the self nom. Let's see what happens. --Hrodulf 20:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For Yet another good one from t3h über p\/\/|\|z012 himself, Hrodulf.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Thumbs up like it --THE 21:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

• Abstain. Needs images! Badly! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
• Conditional for in that we notify people that it's US coins in the title. Also, why Oregon? Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 21:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment The only image that would make sense is a closeup of a coin that said "FUCK GOD" but I don't have the skills to pull that off, sorry. As for the Oregon question, I put that in there because they attempted to legalize medical marijuana there. As for changing the name so that it's US coins, that's fine with me, I'll try to do it (it will require a page move). --Hrodulf 21:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: -0.5

1. For Hillarious stuff —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.177.48.178 (talk • contribs) dif

1. Sorry But I'm gonna have to say no here. A bit lengthy and, while not horrible, a little bit too un-well-done for my taste. Polishing would do this wonders. And who added this?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Until signed, this is a moot For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Oh, those whacky IPs. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 8 mythical lumberjacks

1. nom & for Fantastic parody of Intelligent Design. Onion level humor! --Hrodulf 16:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
2. weak for Not hilarious, but still pretty good satire. Why'd it get such a shitty pee review though?-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For Very funny An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays Consult the Oracle 21:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Scopes v. State of Tennesse --~

   Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

   21:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Self-For Thanks for the nom Hrodulf --THE 21:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
6. i'm a lumber-- wait, that's not original, so saying for will do for now --» >UF|TLK|▋» 23:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
7. Dig another good one Mr. THE --THINKER 01:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For The sad thing is that this is more true than anything else. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service)

No against votes

1. The scopes v. state of tennessee guy didn't say "for" so I guess that doesn't count as a vote. --Hrodulf 21:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure it does-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 21:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

We've got this thing called a table now that says "for" and "against". It's not even really required anymore here. --~

Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

22:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

IDNKT --Hrodulf 22:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 9 Alfred E. Neuman grins

1. Nom & For -- Reviewed in the Pee Review and thought it was great. Another goody from Ljlego. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 22:36, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
2. I agree. We can all learn something from this. It takes the whole first-person narrative and twists it at the end. A great article.--Mr.Vib 23:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For--GUN Shandon 00:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For--Mad for it. --Back Door 00:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Self-for I think I like it. Not sure though...-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Hesitant For. Ljlego is writing too many good articles. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
7. I watched an episode a couple of years ago. In one episode they made fun of cripples, the elderly, the homeless and the mentally retarded. TV sucks. They should've stuck with the Vancome Lady and Javaman. Still, for. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For But SNL is funnier!--Dr. Fenwick 12:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For Another nice one, Ljlego. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 16:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For This is funny, and UKNOWNFILE is an utter cockend. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 23:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For, did someone say cockend? -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Uh-oh, hotdog! I didn't really like this article. I watch MadTV and it doesn't do the show justice. (P.S. Saturday Night Live sucks) Kip the Dip 17:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
2. a) this article is poop b) you wanted me to vote so there you go --» >UF|TLK|▋» 23:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

"Voters: don't be dicks and do be constructive with criticism." What part of that is hard to understand, UNKNOWNFILE? --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 00:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I agree wholly with e|m|c, I say his votes against my own and this article be stricken. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but his vote still counts. Even if he is a dick. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 01:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. To be fair, I don't really hate the article, I'm just tired of people criticizing MadTV. And SNL doesn't actually suck (more cowbell!), just nowadays I feel all they do is overyly political humor and lame Weekend Update jokes. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •

• That hardly seems fair to me. So you don't like that I made fun of a show that you like? Big deal! If you don't dislike the article, at the very least abstain.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 10 soiled pairs of pants

1. Nom + For Very funny work courtesy of DiZ.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For I said it was funny when it was in the piss, and I say it's funny now (and the captions are better!)P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For - A sheer work of genius, if I do say so myself. 'Cough-cough' --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 23:37, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For--Gaberou 04:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Weak for. --L 06:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
6. FOR. Thought it was hilarious. --Polyamorousx 16:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For Gave me a whole new philosophy. I used to consider it a mild annoyance, but I'll value every crap from now on. Sir Roger 19:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For funny. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
9. For Push! Push! Kip the Dip 17:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
10. XD Brilliant! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~}
11. Yes. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For I like the Hello Kitty picture --24.215.168.140 16:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against scatological just-okay-edness. Sry. --THINKER 16:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

ROTFLOL at the last sentence of the article. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •

Same w/ me, but I think it's really that the article sets up for the joke through the entire thing to make it funny. Standing alone, it's alright, but after the article, brilliant!P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

True dat. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •

Score: 12 Signers of the Declaration of Jesus-pendance

1. Nom AND For. I likes it. And you should, too. If you don't like it, help fix it. It has been said (by whom I will not tell DiZtheGreat) that this article is better that most other articles he sees up here on VFH. so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 16:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For Pretty goodful.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Strong Four very funny --THE 17:59, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
4. XD--GUN Shandon 18:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Dig hilarious, what a great concept. --THINKER 21:36, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
6. I wanted to nominate this one myself. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 06:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
7. This article is devine.-- 11:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
8. for though I do have One minor Point of Criticism: Due to the Holes someone found necessary to Apply to My Feet, I nowadays Prefer not to Perform the Walking on Water Thingy unless Absolutely Necessary. Original Jesus 15:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For Jesus is a cliché, but this article is bringing sexy back. To Jesus, I mean. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 17:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For Loved it. Ate it. The Oblong Lobster 22:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For In the words of the 1337-5P34K0RZ: Z0|\/|6, 7|-|47 |/\|45 |-||14R|0|_|5! --Banjo2e 05:05, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
13. for --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
14. For Sir Roger 20:07, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
15. Weak For--Back Door 00:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against - Just didn't strike me as that funny. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:08
2. Weak Against - Better than a lot of the crap around here, but just didn't do it for me. Plus I had to fix TWO grammar mistakes!P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:59, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Against. I should like this, but it's not grabbing me. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 11 Totally Rad Dudes!

1. Nom & For. Really funny article by The Thinker. Style is really good, humo(u)r is great, and the length is just right for a high school student with the attention span of a gerbil.--Mr.Vib 16:19, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For because it makes it quite obvious that it's just past the normal "awesome" teacher Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 16:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For One of the thinker's most inspired ("inspir'd"?) articles. Thumbs up --THE 18:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
4. sDig Thanks Vib. He really did bring in a real live whale, man.. :-D --THINKER 21:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For--Gaberou 22:51, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
6. You don't understand just how friggin' wicked he is! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:18, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
7. Okay, okay...it's been fifteen frickin years man since I was in highschool, but I remember the guy. Hasn't changed a bit, and I'm still for!--GUN Shandon 02:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For --Leoispotter 18:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For and we got to smoke weed after class until some prick narked to the Board of Education - and man, Mr. Kearsy got even cooler in prison. Sir Roger 20:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For Aawww, I never get the cool teachers....Fuckin Ms. Walker....P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For When you say "Ms. Walker," do you mean Tommy Walker's mother? Because she is a bitch!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For. --Emmzee 15:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
13. Awesome, Duuuuude! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~}

1. Against He made me wash his motorcycle and failed me after I questioned his teaching methods. Fuckin' jackass... --Dexter111344 17:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Against--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E  throw a snowball  21:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Ljlego - In a roundabout way, you're right. I was watching Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome in which the annoying feral childrens chant about Captain and Mrs. Walker, referencing Tommy (as Tina Turner was in the film version). And, since its one of my favorite records, I thought I'd throw it in. Good job kid! :) --THINKER 03:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 12 doody rivers

1. Nom & For. Give this one a very good read before voting here. The more carefully you read it, the more you should realise how awesome it is. Oh, and see if you can guess who the author is without looking. :) Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 16:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For Very humorous.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Dig I love it! hilarity!!! --THINKER 21:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For -- Has more theme than a lot of this guy's stuff, IMHO. ----OEJ 23:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For. Very good. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:10
6. For, I plan my vacations around Dirk Snyddering mad ramblings. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 15:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
7. for It captures the atmosphere with incredible accuracy, whilst still being 100 percent satire. My good Lady, or hounouroable Sir, you earned my r.e.s.p.e.c.t -- di Mario 16:02, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
8. Fer Shizzle satire-licious P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For Genius. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For • • • Necropaxx (T) {~}
11. For. Palinesque journalism. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
12. Me likely --Dexter111344 21:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

A bit tedious, it only needs about 1 week to achieve featured in my book. But that's just me. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~}

Welcome to the Real World of VFH. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 10

1. If someone wants to nom Hermaphrodite, that had the next-best percentage on the list. I didn't particularly care for that one, though, so I'm nomming one I liked.--<<>> 15:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For. OMG! Brad's got a list! Run! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Dig a great take on one of our nation's funniest debacles. Gotta check those error margins, Chicago! hehe.. oh and "Dewey Cheatem & Howe" got a real live lol. :) --THINKER 22:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For--Gaberou 22:47, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 02:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Kwakerjak, you are much missed. Brad, thanks for the list. Strong For, and blast it all if this one doesn't make it! We are going to feature a US presidential election article eventually, darnit! --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 06:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:11
8. For just like before. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 01:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For. Once again, Uncyclopedia teaches me about American history. I didn't even know there was ever a President Dewey before this! -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 20 fiery banquets

1. I could not stop giggling when I read this article. --General Insineratehymn 22:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
2. I think dining in hell might be a better name, but it's still funny, and that's what counts. --~

   Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

   22:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For The title leaves a little to be desired, but the article as a whole is genius.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
4. THIS IS SPARTAAAAAAAAAA --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
5. I do like this one very much. --Pcgamermofo 03:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Very Nice!'  Weasel 3689 06:11, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For Not quite my impression of what dining in hell would be like. Thanks for clearing it up for me, I plan to be dining there a lot in the future. -- RAHB 10:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For--Shandon 18:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For - Hooray for hell! No, wait... {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 02:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:14, 03 June 2007
11. Very very much for. And please, DO NOT TOUCH THE TITLE. It's just a part of the charm. ~ 17:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
12. Calm down, dear. It's only a For. Made me laugh plenty. Famous film quote + Michael Winner = A, erm, Winner. --Zarbag 17:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For. -- Mitch 17:41, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
14. "Curry with an unusual but piquant tang of petrol" --KATIE!! 21:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
16. For. Absobloodylutely hilarious! Vanaelin 02:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
17. For You really should be a restaurant critic. That was very awesome. The title can stay, as I felt like it set the opening mood. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service)
18. For. She made me do it. plus it's actually pretty funny -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 12:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
19. SelfFor. With thanks to those who helped with advice and puns :) -- sannse (talk) 16:27, 5 June 2007
20. What the Hell. Featured articles for everybody! whoo! so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 21:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

(UTC)

#AGAINST Sparta is overdone. Tonight we dine in SUCK. so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 16:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC) I changed my mind. so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 21:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against - Slifer put it perfectly. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:13
2. Against - Maybe I'm missing something, maybe I'm a philistine, but this article just doesn't do it for me. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 17:08, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

• Conditional for. The title has got to go for this to be acceptable on the front page. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:10, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

• Move to traditional titling with title hack on the page for the all caps? --THINKER 05:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
• What's wrong with the title? --KATIE!! 00:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
• Its Bensonized? --THINKER 21:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

• BENSONIZED??! BENSON is a mere statuesque phantom to you--he was a myth even to me. The title has nothing to do with that user, and must remain as-is. Because it's funny.--GUN Shandon 03:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

• Abstain. I have an enormously strong feeling emanating from somewhere in my person that says that this article is funny. However, it isn't making me laugh. Is there a backstory to this? --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 04:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

The short answer is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Winner - it seems from the votes that it also works as "general restaurant critic" for those that don't know of MW, but really he's the target here. Not that I expect your vote for this explanation of course, if it has to be explained then it obviously doesn't work for you ;) -- sannse (talk) 14:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 6 pervy old codgers

1. NomandFor - A great piece of work from TKF...has FRONT PAGE written all over it (not literally though) -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 22:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Yes-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For! Thanks for the nom Mhaille :) I was going to wait until the weekend to self-nom when Sannse finishes the final image, but this is good too. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:25, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
4. DIG!!!! Very very funny, I hope this one shoots on through. Great work TKF! --THINKER 21:35, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
5. F☭R 09:44, 31 May 2007
6. For --THE 23:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For B a n g The Oblong Lobster 23:43, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Bigass For Love it. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 18:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
9. Queezy For It's really funny but gosh just feels so wrong reading it.--Dr. Fenwick 20:10, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
10. Weakish For. Wasn't too sure, but good in the end. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:19
11. Eh.......ok-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 02:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 04:38, 06 June 2007

1. No thx. I have long since tired of ageist jokes, especially the type of "they're old, so they want your sex". Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 21:39, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
2. TKF was vote whoring again on IRC... that was bad enough, this article was worse --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

   So much for constructive criticism, eh UF? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:38, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

3. Not seeing the humor. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 22:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
4. The vague Princess Brideism just isn't enough to hold my interest. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Nah --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
6. No Not even a grin. too predictable for me. --Back Door 16:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

I dunno what's going on with the score, but it's messed up.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Fix'd --THINKER 22:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Thar she blows!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:39, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 7 injured skiers

1. Nom + For THE's best work--Leoispotter
2. Dig this is an article I was planning on helping to birth into glory. Its still a bit rough, so if it doesn't make it this time, I'll put those edits into effect. Still hilarious, and still a fine example of why THE is, to me, one of the funniest and most promising writers here at Un. --THINKER 21:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Wow! Thanks! self for --THE 22:52, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Strong For The humor far outweighs any crudeness. Quality quality right here.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For--Gaberou 15:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For- Was there really a need for an article like this? The answer is yes! Difficulty level 7!--Dr. Fenwick 20:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For--Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

1. I read and reread it and still am not finding the funny. Oh, there it is. It was in my pants. Maybe you should ignore that last bit. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Abstain This article has a lot of humor in it. However, the violence in it seems unnecessary and crude, and detracts from the article as a whole. In my opinion, of course. Didn't we have this not too long ago, too?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:43, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't think we did.Leoispotter

I could be wrong, I don't know. I will contemplate my decision for now.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

I've reread it many times, and my abstinence is now lifted...-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 10 MAGGOTS!

1. nom & for. excellent example of self-reference. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Weak for on account of the fact that all caps fits. Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman
3. --~

   Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

   20:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For and comment to the againsters: are you crazy? THIS ARTICLE IS SUPPOSED TO BE YELLING AT YOUR FACE, SCUMMAGGOTS! -- herr doktor needsAshuttle  [scream!] 20:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
6. For--Dr. Fenwick 02:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For Funny. --Hrodulf 02:10, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
8. weak for it isn't hilarious, but I liked it enough to give it my vote --THE
9. For I liked this one --Leoispotter 23:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
10. FOR VOTE FOR IT, MAGGOT. IT'S FUNNY. --Ekashp 16:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For. One of my favorites as of right...now. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 06:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
12. Yep. There's the self-reference, and the fact that he seems to be referring to Uncyc itself, and the fact that you can just hear him screaming it... It's short. I'm really picky about short. But it's also really, really funny. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 06:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
13. Fer Shizzle I liked the article. usually I don't like the ones with that much.....profanity? But I could really hear the Drill Sergeant telling me I was a fag-maggot. Funny. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:10, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
14. For. Although it is funny, the incessant profanity wears down the humor. A little profanity is fine, but every other word gets old real fast. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~}
15. For. Looks fun, especially from previous experience! No seriously I like DRILL SARG. ---Jmgh 03:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)User:Jmgh/sig
16. For Despite my agreement with comments such as MO's, I still found this funny. A rare thing t'would seem. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 04:20, 06 June 2007
17. One of the best articles I have ever read on this site. Short is ok, because I don't know how much of that I could take. There were more cuss-words than between all those 14 year olds playing Halo online. I could hear him screaming the whole damn article. It was awesome. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service)
18. FOR, LISTEN UP YOU MAGGOTS. THIS IS A GOOD ARTICAL IT'S SELF REFERENCE AND VERY WELL WRITTERN. IF YOU VOTED AGAINST THIS PAGE GIVE ME 5000000000000000 PUSH UPS. Goddamnit I lost my voice--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E  throw a snowball  21:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Naaah. --L 16:12, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Against The whole thing is CAPS, how can I see? Vincent Pun 16:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Against Don't get me wrong but it being in all caps makes it harder to read, and thereby, takes away from its humour. But if the article isn't in all caps, it doesn't make sense and not funny at all. It is quite the paradox. --Dexter111344 17:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
4. No. Having this on the front page is a long shot away from having even Ct. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Against. I was thinking about voting for it, but You TEH GEY gave me a rash. Sorry. ~ 21:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Against - I love the idea (like most of So So's articles), but the execution isn't great. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

   Is it just, so so? Sorry I couldn't resist!~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 04:20, 06 June 2007

7. Against. Not hard to read, but not particularly funny. Maybe with audio? I dunno. --El Zoof 07:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Against, as The Thinker. Also, Drill Instructors don't yell all the time, as it just reduces the effect when they do yell. Sometimes they're your best friend, here to help you get through then...BOOM! Suddenly you're doing pushups for somethingorother. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:15, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

   That would make it funnier if the caps were only in some parts ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 04:20, 06 June 2007

• Abs. Funny, but wears thin early. I think it could be 20x funnier if a different approach was taken. --THINKER 20:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Abstain. I REALLY want to vote for this since the execution is the right way to do it. However, it's just too full-force the entire time.--Mr.Vib 13:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
• Tweaked as of 1230. --So So 15:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 12 scientifically jaded Uncyclopedians

1. Nom+Dig I found this article hilarious before doing a minor touch-up and adding the right pic and caption. I found it even funnier with the shaking space shuttle, and after rereading, yes. Its hilarious and even funnier. Simultaneously. --THINKER 21:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For. Also, part of my soul just died. Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 23:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For. -- Mitch 12:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Definately This is very good.. The Oblong Lobster 16:40, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Up, up, and awaaaaay! ... Okay that was lame. For. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 21:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
6. for --THE 00:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For –—Hv (talk) 30/05 13:20
8. Beautiful-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For. Space, the first budget cut. These are the sitting around and rustings of the space shuttle fleet... --El Zoof 07:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For. Nice parody.--Mr.Vib 14:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For --Back Door 10:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Abstain Perhaps I shouldn't read VFH while I'm in Accounting class, because none of them seem funny nor sense making. I totally don't get what this article is about. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 04:02, 06 June 2007

Score: 12 Flying Japanese Sand Tigers

1. Self-Nom and For. Pee Reviewed and reviewed again after a complete rewrite. I know that it's difficult to read, but that's the only way I found to make it work. --Mr.Vib 11:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For. I really like the tone and flow. The plot devices are terrific and I really dig the multilayered, multidimensional themes and story lines thought out the article. Greetings from a fellow Pathological liar.-- Vosnul 14:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Against ForThis is complete and utter tripe It's funny. I liked it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Dig there are some improvements that could be made to help readability, but its pretty damn funny regardless. --THINKER 18:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
5. 4 Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Even if I end up Darwining my own article, For Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 19:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For --THE 21:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For I also have an idea for a reskin based around this. --General Insineratehymn 21:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 05:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For - Damn funny (I'm a pathological liar...) ;) Spawn Man 05:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For. -- Mitch 12:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For. --User:TheHop 1 2/sig 9:50, 29 May, 2007 (UTC)
13. For I can feel the sun! The Oblong Lobster 16:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
14. Why Not?  Weasel 3689 23:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
15. For Karma-AH 07:25, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
16. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 13:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
17. Against Nachos. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

1. The humour is unsubtle at best and all the crossing out is annoying. --Kelpan 15:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Against. I've read it three times now and...I like the idea, but the execution makes blood come out of my ears (which is a nice change, admittedly, but still). Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 15:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Against, slightly. A strange problem, but I just don't find it funny as it is, with the lies crossed out. It would be far funnier the other way round, with the truth being deleted, or even not there at all leaving just the lies. As it is it is just not funny. --Imber 11:19, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Against. The same reason as Imber. --Back Door 01:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Against As per MO, Imber, Kelpan etc. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:56, 06 June 2007

• Just created a reskin related to this article, located here. Add or improve to it if needed. --General Insineratehymn 23:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Who left the unsigned "against" vote in the #3 slot?--Mr.Vib 13:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 13 Norse sports newscasters

1. Well, Kalir nommed one of mine, so now I've found one of his that I liked that I thought was worth a for.--<<>> 04:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
2. That good, eh? Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 04:43, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For: As someone who liked the original game, the sportsdesk picture really sells it, and the article itself delivers it. I, for one, welcome our Norse overlords. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 08:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For, dudes. -- Hindleyite Converse 10:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For. --Emmzee 15:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
6. yes Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 19:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For Kind of random but very funny nonetheless--Dr. Fenwick 00:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For the vikings. -- herr doktor needsAshuttle  [scream!] 17:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
9. Weak for The picture put me over the edge.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
10. By Thor! -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 21:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
11. Strong For, those pictures are awesome. We should totally feature them or something. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For. -- Mitch 16:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For! I deserve extra credit for fixing ZB's spelling errors. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For I liek much. so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 16:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

1. against Great Video Game: Shitty Article --Steve Johnsenson 05:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against I like the concept, but there are changes that need to be made. With such a random connection (video games Vikings turned newscasters), a better segue is needed. I'd help, as Kalir suggested, but I don't know anything about the game. Sorry bro. --THINKER 18:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Keep in mind, I've yet to get an article to featured status, so if you could provide good advice, you can get a hippie when you bring the article back down to earth. Also, I'll be thankful. And everyone loves a happy Kalir. Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 05:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

The Steve Johnsenson against wave (and its numerous references to feces) leads me to believe that little constructive input will be offered. --THINKER 05:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Ah. Well, the request still stands, but thanks. Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 05:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I have concluded that the conclusion needs to be more effectively concluded, otherwise voters will conclude that an Against vote is needed to conclude this VFH section. So, yeah, I beefed up the end. Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 19:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

My issue is more with the leap from being vikings, to being vikings at the super bowl, to being viking behind a newscasters desk. The intro is like 4 sentences; for people who don't know whats up, well... they wont know whats up now will they? --THINKER 20:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Ah. I do that sometimes... If you want, you can take a crack at fixing it. It is a wiki after all. Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 22:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

I'd help, as Kalir suggested, but I don't know anything about the game. Sorry bro. I'm not equipped for such a task. --THINKER 01:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

EEEHHHH??? Am I the only person who hasn't got a clue what this is about?!?! Therefore Abstain ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:52, 06 June 2007

Here, go read this first. Better yet, read it, then go get a copy of it. The subject, not the article. Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 03:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 11.5 painted-on Powerpoint slides

1. Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 09:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For. This generation's Waiting for Godot? Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 13:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Could've sworn Mandaliet wrote this one from the corporate drone's parts... Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 15:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
4. DIG I thought the same thing as ENeGMA. Brilliant! :) --THINKER 18:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
5. YEs I really like this kind of thing. The Oblong Lobster 23:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
6. -- 20:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Yes-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Brilliant -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
9. ForInfiniteMonkey
10. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For Suicide looms... lol 134.226.1.229 19:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For. Nothing like corporate asses dying inside...or something like that. --Mr.Vib 18:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For Heeheehee... I am laughing... --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 07:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For Loved it! <3 ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 07:08, 02 June 2007

1. Not bad, I chuckled at parts but definitely not featured article material. ennui2778 dif
2. Naaah--Sir Shandon 06:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Sucks Ass --Steve Johnsenson 04:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 8 Dragon Dung masters

1. Brad made me do it. Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 02:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2. I did not. Also, for.--<<>> 02:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
3. You did too. Probably. Maybe. I wasn't there. Also, for. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Hi YA! I vote for articre now.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Dig --THINKER 01:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Hai. --Emmzee 13:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For...All right, Brad: after a day or two of letting this percolate in voting, I've concluded this is better than most.--Sir Shandon 10:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For- Not sure why I like this show but I do so yeah....--Dr. Fenwick 22:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For. -- Mitch 12:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

1. no, no, no! where is the humor? --Steve Johnsenson

05:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against Sorry guys. I just didn't like it. User:Sserq fet/sig

Score: 12 reimagined John Hughes movies

1. nom and for : This is one of the funniest articles I've ever read --Uncle J 01:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For. Maybe one day I'll watch the movie. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For, because I like dead baby jokes. Or really anything involving baby jokes. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 14:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For. --Emmzee 22:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
6. --L 03:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Dig in the words of the wise Rafiki; "change, is good." Much better updated. --THINKER 11:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Change of heart (again). Change at the end makes it more complete. I like it. --Mr.Vib 12:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
9. Mmmmm...okay--THE 13:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
10. Sure Me likely. --Dexter111344 02:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For--Dr. Fenwick 02:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For--Will Tomlinson —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HamishTheSecond (talk • contribs) dif
13. For /titter ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:24, 02 June 2007
14. For I don't know. I didn't think it was that funny. The TV show put me over the edge. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service)

1. strong against Fine if you enjoy feces consumption --Steve Johnsenson 05:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:31, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Iffy Against While it's funny, it's mainly a quote and lacks any sort of mock tone that would put it over the top for me. Call me crazy. Sorry.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Against per Mr. Vib --THINKER 01:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Against. Who gives a crap? -- Kip > Talk • Works • •

• Okay, okay, I fleshed out the text and dropped the "this reporter" bit. I didn't wanna, but I am bowing to peer pressure for the greater good of Uncyclopedia. Jeez, the things I do for this website... Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 16 humorous brain-shaped hats

1. Self nom & For A brilliant idea by El Zoof, expanded and rewritten by yrs. truly --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:43, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Approved. -- herr doktor needsAshuttle  [scream!] 02:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For. Well, what the hell did you expect? I merely laid the corpse out on the slab, it was Cap'n Ben who attached the electrodes and sent it lumbering towards the Village People. --El Zoof 05:44, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For It should be featured without a doubt. Kip the Dip 12:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Oh my god, this is brilliant. For. --Emmzee 13:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Dig very good stuff --THINKER 18:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
7. EAT THAT! - I would say yes. The Oblong Lobster 22:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For. Devilishly brilliant. Near-perfect comedy. YouFang 01:05, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For. -- Mitch 13:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For The White House Brain Roll sealed the deal. Hugs! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 02:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For. ~ 13:05, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
12. Feb 14. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 18:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For Don alun 11:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For Took me too long to get to this baby.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
15. For Two thumbs up...well ok one used to be a toe, but you get the idea ;) ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 04:58, 02 June 2007
16. For. I liked this when it was on Pee, and I still like it a lot. ----OEJ 00:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

1. not --Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. I was going to nominate it myself around Valentine's Day, but if y'all think it's ready now, okay. Kip the Dip 12:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Would be perfect for Valentine's Day. But that's a while off.The Oblong Lobster 22:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

I had originally intended it to be released before Valentine's Day in the hope that it got picked up as front-page material for that day... but then I got stuck and ran away and hid from the article. Thanks once again to Cap'n Ben for rescuing it. --El Zoof 21:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Maybe the admins should put this article on hold after the vote and then feature it on Valentine's Frankenstein's Day? Kip the Dip 02:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 12 Cro-Magnon poets

1. For. Quasi that made me laugh. --He's a radical rat! ^{(Talk page!/Contribs)}
2. Onka-Bonka! -- herr doktor needsAshuttle  [scream!] 16:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Article good for brain. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:45, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Still for, although most of it is over my head. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Weak for. It's hilarious, I laughed out loud at "Ug no able record CSI: Miami," but it's a little too short... but funny enough to compensate. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 03:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
6. --L 10:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Self-for. --Emmzee 00:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Dig but Ug digress --THINKER 20:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
10. Fug, even though I voted Agug last time -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
11. Featured article good. --General Insineratehymn 02:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
12. Abstinence Lifted Good luck.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:54, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 20:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For. goshzillacorrespondence 02:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
15. For --  User:Java7837 (contributions) (talk) 01:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

1. crap--Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against Lovely article, but I think MO's article did the caveman thing better. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:23, 14 May 2007
2. nope, nope, nope. not funny, semi-duplicate article and vote-whoring on irc is a great way to seal your fate. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
3. *sigh* I'm sorry. Against. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 22:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Abstain because I think that two caveman themed articles so near each other is uncool. Really good though. Will renom at an unspecified date.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:47, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment... So? We had two communist articles in a row, and all that happened was that it got added to Worst 100 Reflections on 2007. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 22:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

• Hey, it's just my rationale for abstinence. Not attempting to convince anyone one way or the other. And plus, why knowingly get added to something with worst in the title.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

• Just vote already. Gol-dang kids with your highfalootin' words like "rationale" and "or". Pah! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

• Peh, you curmudgeonly old fogies with your incomprehension of words such as or. I like the article, but my will remains firm. You know what else is firm? Ironing boards.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Alright, my will is less firm than I originally made it out to be. Sue me.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 18 animo acids

Featured —rc (t) 04:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Nom+for. Oh comon, even you have to admit this take on anime led to some great chemsisty.--<<>> 22:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For Very nice <insert obligatory Borat joke here>-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Strong For, even though it's just begging to be IP raped. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:55, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Self-for. I've been working on this on and off for almost two months now, and I'm flattered to see that it was nominated so quickly! --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 04:06, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For. All praises to anime, although I got the feeling the idea was somehow stolen from me... --The Dit 07:35, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
6. -- 20:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For. Very clever. --Andorin Kato 20:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For I've seen the article before, and trust me, this is a vast improvement. I think it should get a full protect after (if) is gets to the front page though. Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 15:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
10. Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 15:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For--Dr. Fenwick 20:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For cool. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 23:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
13. Very for, especially with the choice of chemical formula. --Imber 18:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
14. Very Strong For. This is an amazing improvement over the original article. Finally, one that doesn't say anime fans are [insert insult here]. That in itself deserves a feature, if even just to keep it that way. I really do like the chemistry, though, very original! -- TheSlyFox 00:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
15. For. Nice work chaps. His Grace, the Duke 11:37, May 24 2007 (BST)
16. every time this article has come back from being nuked it has sucked. this is an exception, in fact, it is very good, so for --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
17. Yes sir, thank you sir. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 22:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
18. Very For: Funny, irreverent, goes in a direction you don't expect it to, and isn't either "omg anime r00lz u all" or "omg anime sux0rz u suk". The sort of thing you could confuse with a "real" article for a few minutes. Excellent indeed. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 00:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
19. For Brilliant idea! Ethereal 10:39, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
20. Strong For - Nice!--Gaberou 15:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
21. For Love the concept, and I especially love the thought of all the little anime fanboys clicking this link from the front page and getting all het up about it. >:D ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:15, 02 June 2007
22. For Cripes! An anime article that a) Is actually really funny, b) Is actually clever and not just a parody of the anime, and c) Isn't necessarily hated by everyone who hates anime. This is truly quite a monumental event! Although this page does still need protection. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Feebas factor (talk • contribs) diff
23. Strong For Very funny and very clever. It's writen in a proper scientific style, yet the content itself is ridiculous. That is precisely how an Uncyclopedia article should be done. TheMothAssassin 1:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
24. For - Actually didn't quite score enough on my laughometer for this vote, but is so well written and clever that a few chuckles will do. -- sannse (talk) 16:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
25. For No specific reason, what you want to fight about it? Also a sorta-self vote cause I added some crappy pictures. Railcgun 19:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Excrement-I tasted bile in the back of my throat --Steve Johnsenson 05:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 02:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
2. -~ 12:54, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Against per UF in the Pee Review: Excellent concept, could be funnier (still). --THINKER 18:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Halfhearted Against. Not good, but not terrible. Just boring. --Emmzee 01:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Against Sorry, this is well written but I just don't get the overall point. The Oblong Lobster 14:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Against. Overall quite bland. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~}
7. Sorry--Leoispotter

• @Jedravent: Is that supposed to be ironic, or is it a mistake? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Mistake. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 16:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• I agree with the person above that this article definitely needs a full protect. -- TheSlyFox 00:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Needs a full protect. Maybe even if it doesn't make it to the front page. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 00:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)