Uncyclopedia:VFH/Why?:I'm In court, Mum

Score: 10 users who haven't been arrested (yet).

1. Self-Nom and For. Yeh. I know... self-nom. But I was looking over my old articles and noticed this had been featured on the Why? page. And I was like it has?. So I thought I'd just see how it does on here. Never know how VFH will turn out... —SEMEN WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [23:40 13 August 2010]
2. Ah, delicious dissonance. Sir MacMania GUN—[00:05 14 Aug 2010]
3. Jolly good. Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 02:11 Saturday, August 14, 2010
4. For. I've read this recently and laughed. The Don made us an article we can't refuse. Aleister 2:14 14 8

   Oh, I see what you did thar! —SEMEN WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [11:34 14 August 2010]

5. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:50, 14 August 2010
6. Forty-Two is the answer to the Life, the Universe and Everything, but that's irrelevant, so For. Methamphetamine Was Here (19:51 08-14-2010)
7. For. this article deeply disturbs me... policewomen!!! what will they think of next.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  14 Aug 2010 ~ 22:13 (UTC)
8. For. Wilytank 12:37, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
9. For. I was going to vote against coz its kinda sick, but actually it made me smile. Vot
10. For. Yeah. --UU - natter 13:30, Aug 17
11. For. I absolutely love the 19th century tone to this piece! Moreso, I love the different euphemisms for his "bishop." Bravo! S3ahawk 23:32, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
12. For I wish I spotted the 19th century tone but I'm just a Pole who can't speak English. Anyway, "funny" story. Funny in the way that can be found only in various Uncyclopedia's articles... Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 14:11, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
13. For - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at17:27, Friday 20 August 2010 -

1. Against. Don't see it as a feature. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:58, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
2. Eh. I didn't find anything here that was particularly hilarious or clever, despite some small laughs here and there and the fact that it's well written, so I'm going to have to give it a weak no.--HM (T) 21:49, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
3. Against. ⦿⨦⨀ phrage 07:56, August 22, 2010 (UTC) Is this Child Pornography ? Sodomy and murder of a nine year old child ?

• Pee Reviews -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:44, August 13, 2010 (UTC)