Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:So Serious?

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Pee Review(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m ("That Rick Avery link pissed me off" isn't my idea of constructive criticism)
Line 11: Line 11:
   
 
{{Pee Review Table
 
{{Pee Review Table
|Hscore=5
+
|Hscore=
|Hcomment=Decent humour. Not ridiculously awesome, not eye-scratchingly horrible. I'm not sure how much you can do with it before it just starts getting old. You had some really good moments, like the beginning of the '''Unicorns''' section, but then by '''Rainbows''' pulling the same exact thing with Leprechauns kind of made it lose its appeal. I found the ending a bit anticlimactic. You could have done without those last two lines, I think.
+
|Hcomment=
|Cscore=6.5
+
|Cscore=
|Ccomment=Everyone's always up for striking fear into the hearts of children. I like the concept, ehm...not much else to day.
+
|Ccomment=
|Pscore=8
+
|Pscore=
|Pcomment=You were consistent with the voice of the narrator the entire time, which helps make it flow fairly smooth. The paragraphs are a bit short for my taste, but like I said, I don't know how much you could do with this before the reader gives up and finds a better article. Overall, the prose/formatting is perfectly fine to me, this is easy to read and transitions pretty well.
+
|Pcomment=
|Iscore=5
+
|Iscore=
|Icomment=The images are exactly what you're talking about, and the captions reiterate the section. Just what images are for. Average score; there's nothing wrong with them, they just didn't make me explode from laughter.
+
|Icomment=
|Mscore=2
+
|Mscore=
|Mcomment=That Rick Avery link pissed me off
+
|Mcomment=
|Fcomment=A decent article.
+
|Fcomment=
|Signature=[[User:Saturnine|Amy Rose]] 13:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
+
|Signature=
 
}}
 
}}
   

Revision as of 13:45, October 5, 2008

FAQ

Why?:So Serious?

Hey! Review! A collab between be and TLB, so it must be at least Pop Secret good.

Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 18:10, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Also, if you just average the other scores in the miscellaneous section, I'll split your head open with a pointy rock. I want the miscellany of my article properly analyzed, dammit. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 18:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
I'll review this, whilst waiting enjoy Noel with this coupon. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 20:41, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm really sorry TKF, I've had a think and I don't think I'm going to be able to do a really good reveiw with this article. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 09:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Ok, so apparently TKF put this up here, and then someone reviewed this and the score was pretty positive, and now I'm all like, sweet, second opinion please? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 15:51, Aug 27
Humour:
Concept:
Prose and formatting:
Images:
Miscellaneous:
Final Score: Not reviewed yet
Reviewer:
Not reviewed yet!
Review now
Personal tools
projects