Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/old

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Pledges)
(Cleaned out the older and already deleted articles.)
Line 28: Line 28:
   
 
__TOC__
 
__TOC__
==[[Category:Exceptionalism]]==
+
==Category:Exceptionalism==
 
This page has been up since May and has NOTHING in it. --[[User:Kafeithekeaton|Kafeithekeaton]] 17:33, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
This page has been up since May and has NOTHING in it. --[[User:Kafeithekeaton|Kafeithekeaton]] 17:33, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
==[[Pledges]]==
 
'''Delete''' I just can't see anyone ever laughing at this. It's just not funny.--[[User:Kafeithekeaton|Kafeithekeaton]] 17:25, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
 
:Yeah, neither can I, cause it's hard to laugh at an article that doesn't exist, [[OMGWTF]][[PWNED]][[ROTFLMAO]]!!!!11oneone --[[User:Spintherism|Spintherism]] 17:36, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
::This sort of stuff can go to [[QVFD]], by the way. --[[User:Spintherism|Spintherism]] 17:39, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
 
==[[Boig jerk]] and [[Adam Taylor]]==
 
It is just vanity. Looks like the author is trying to insult a friend. [[User:Mosquitopsu|Mosquitopsu]] 17:22, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
:Deleted. --[[User:Spintherism|Spintherism]] 17:27, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
 
==[[Dump truck mode]]==
 
'''Delete''' Seems the author just tried to link to an outside picture, then ignored it.--[[User:Kafeithekeaton|Kafeithekeaton]] 17:20, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
 
==[[Making up Bob Dole quotes]]==
 
'''Delete''' Hey hey, ho ho, [[Making up Bob Dole quotes]] has got to go! It's boring, unfunny, overly political, and whoever wrote it doesn't know anything about formatting. And it's not as if I'm being political by calilng for it's deletion. It's just a crappy page. Also, FYI: I'm a big fan of making up quotes in general. (I'm trying to popularize [[HowTo:Make up quotes]] - check it out!) It's just that this particular page sucks. This is the first time I've ever submitted a page for deletion in any wiki ever ... wow ... If anybody wants to reformat it and try to think of something really really funny to say and save it, fine by me. Go for it! I'd prefer that happen. But otherwise, it's '''NUKE TIME!''' [[User:Nerd42|Nerd42]] 23:46, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
:Already been deleted 3 times. The stupid thing just keeps growing back! {{User:Dawg/sig}} 00:00, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
::Would you prefer I did not link to it from [[HowTo:Make up quotes]]? I was just doing it sort of in the interests of fairness ... even though I wanted the page deleted ... isn't there some kinda tag you admins can add that locks the page down so people can't edit it? I've seen that done on [[wikipedia]] ... [[User:Nerd42|Nerd42]] 00:07, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
:::There is, but we use it sparingly - mainly for the [[Uncyclopedia:CVP|CVP]]. You can leave it if you want or omit it - your choice, it tends to grow back slowly. {{User:Dawg/sig}} 00:41, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
 
==[[Vista]]==
 
Biased, mostly unfunny. Copied the only redeemable paragraph to [[Windows Vista]]. - [[User:Guest|Guest]] 13:24, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
:It also expired. Now terminated. {{User:Dawg/sig}} 23:54, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
 
==[[Dog City]]==
 
 
Yes, I'm obnoxious, I know, but if there was a point to this article, or humour involved, then it went right over my head. Also, everything else edited by the same guy seems to be one-line unfunny stuff. --[[User:Malleus|Malleus]] 09:10, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
 
==[[1895 war of cookies]], [[Arc the lad]], [[BatTom]], [[Crapola]], [[Coon]]==
 
 
I found these while looking through the uncategorised articles section, and couldn't find any redeeming features. Am I the only one who thinks articles like these should be shot repeatedly? If they had physical bodies, anyway. --[[User:Malleus|Malleus]] 03:25, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
 
==[[Money saving tips]]==
 
Copied from [http://www.cosmik-debris.net/index.php?p=89] as listed on article. [[User:205.188.117.69|205.188.117.69]] 02:11, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 
   
 
==Archived VFD Discussions==
 
==Archived VFD Discussions==

Revision as of 17:48, October 22, 2005

Important Points to note

1. Read: Uncyclopedia:Deletion Policy
2. Please remember to sign your votes and edits! Use --~~~~ or the "Sign" button (Button sig). Signed votes are more credible.
2.1 Multiple votes on the same entry from one person (that is, one using puppet accounts) is considered agenda-pushing and is frowned upon. You will be sent to the Gulags for any ergrious breech of this policy.
2.2 MAKE SURE YOUR VOTES ARE CLEAR. Please put your vote in bold text. Make all the witty comments you want, just make sure your vote is visible and explicit. Example: 'Fucking Delete this piece of dogshit article! It sucks!' --slack 06:27, 11 Aug 2005 (UTC)
2.2.1 (maybe not that explicit)
3. For pages that are created as a form of vandalism, or that are plagiarized, use QuickVFD.
4. For archived discussions, see the Archived VFD Discussions.
5. For a list of unused images, click here: Pages_for_deletion/unusedimages
6. If you edit VFD disruptively, you will be banned without warning. That sort of behaviour is annoying and unnecessary.
7. Each section header on this page normally contains a link to the item being voted upon; please use [[:Image: and [[:Category: ...]] instead of simply [[Image: or [[Category: ...]] when linking to non-text.
8. SysOps, please check the page history before deleting if you see something like it suspiciously changed titles. And please archive old entries when they start to clutter up the page; also, create a new archive page when the one in use gets ridiculously big. Also, get me a sandwich.
9. Latest candidate goes on top:

Category:Exceptionalism

This page has been up since May and has NOTHING in it. --Kafeithekeaton 17:33, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Archived VFD Discussions

Personal tools
projects