From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 17: Line 17:
seddie 4eva, deal wit it
seddie 4eva, deal wit it
== Interwikis ==
Add the interwikis:<br>
<code><nowiki>[[pt:ICarly]]</nowiki></code> [[Special:Contributions/|]] 02:40, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:40, May 7, 2010

Emblem-important-red Please Read Before Editing this Article
This article is a vandalism/self-righteous rant against an old version the article. The vandal's text, which is the "body" of the article has not been altered, and it should probably remain that way.
The footnotes, along with header info, links, et cetera, can be altered. However, it is probably a good idea to be conservative in editing those sections too.
Additionally, you may want to read old iCarly article before editing. The intro and "Synopsis" section should give you an adequate overview of the theme of the article.
--Mn-z 00:27, March 15, 2010 (UTC)


OK, MnB, I'm sorry but you'll have to explain that to me. How is that better than the last deleted piece? ~Jewriken.GIF 11:13, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

I honestly, and truthfully have absolutely never watched this show. I don't remember ever even seeing an advert for it, and I have no idea what it is. Still I have not really watched the TV for over a year now so... Still I'm just bragging that you guys all actually apparently know what this show is all about, whereas I just don't have a clue. Of that I am proud. :) */me bows* MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 11:40, Feb 28
It's an American tv show about two teenage girls who have their own webshow. As much as that suggests porn, it is not (unfortunately). —Paizuri MUN Talkpage My Contributions 11:53, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
The jokes on the page seem to be both the girl trying to protect her fave program from the evil uncyclopedians and the footnotes which then comment on her pleas and condemnations. They work, for me, very well in combination, thusly: ha ha hee hee, snort. A short explanationAleister AIClogo 12:35 28 2 2mX
What he said basically. Basically, a teen boy creates a mess of an attack article on an annoying Tween sitcom, a teen fangirl then replaces the article with a self-righteous vandal-rant, then the original author adds some smart-ass footnotes to the vandal-rant. Basically, something along the lines of Sania Mirza. It is a bit in-jokey, but probably better than anything else that will be written on the topic. --Mn-z 00:44, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
I actually like this page. It's very reminiscent of UN:W. ~Scriptsiggy.JPGTelephonesig Star Starsig Kidneysig 13:22, Mar 12, 2010
1, don't use gibberish (as per, and 2, don't cite essays that aren't applications of official policy as if they were official policy.--L33thaxx 00:10, March 14, 2010 (UTC)
You do know that this is uncyclopedia, not wikipedia, right? --Mn-z 00:27, March 14, 2010 (UTC)
In my defense, I didn't know that "Mark Matzko" was a totally fictional character until the author/vandal-ranter informed me of it. --Mn-z 00:37, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

I don't know who likes the current version of the page, but this is a huge waste. iCarly is perhaps the most aggressively obnoxious show still being made right now, and it shamelessly promotes itself by making all of the characters besides the total jerks love the webshow. Letting the version that puts its detractors on the defensive by being more self-rightous than funny stand is a giant miscalculation. Off the top of my head, I can think up several funnier approaches. 02:31, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

seddie 4eva, deal wit it


Add the interwikis:
[[pt:ICarly]] 02:40, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

Personal tools