Note: This topic has been unedited for 2251 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
March of the Sluts!
left
The comprehensive in the title means it contains every name in the top 1000 most linked pages. If I missed anyone out or stuffed anything up, feel free to start a flamewar on my talk page.
Bold = admin,
Italic = welcoming committee member
Mhaille (4,604 links)
Benson (2,765 links)
Tom mayfair (2,600 links)
Todd Lyons (2,585 links)
Zombiebaron (2,281 links)
Codeine (1,857 links)
Insineratehymn (1,737 links)
Braydie (1,658 links)
Tompkins (1,437 links)
Mordillo (1,153 links)
Hinoa (1,128 links) (including links to old user page)
Modusoperandi (1,000 links)
Rcmurphy (970 links)
Bradaphraser (929 links)
Splaka (857 links)
Nintendorulez (809 links)
Hindleyite (792 links)
Famine (785 links)
MoneySign (671 links)
Savethemooses (646 links)
Tooltroll (623 links)
Spang (598 links)
Ghelae (578 links)
Zim ulator (571 links)
Chronarion (509 links)
Crazyswordsman (501 links)
Hrodulf (497 links)
Rataube (479 links)
Keitei (472 links)
Carlb (463 links)
Squiggle (462 links) (including links to old user page)
At an even thousand I don't know whether to be amused or depressed. I think I'll go outside. Maybe take a walk...see those things out there. What do you call them? Ah, "people". --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 03:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Peo-ple? What on earth are you talking about? SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 03:29, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
I'll be beating Chron by the next slut list. Is he even around anymore? --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 03:33, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Chron made about 10 contributions this January, but none since. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 03:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Two hundred and twenty-two? I am one-third Satan, it seems. --»The AcceptableCainad(Fnord) 03:46, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
I'm down from last month. Must work harder... starting with this pointless comment that only serves as another link to my userpage. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 04:39, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
I made the list for the first time. I like how I've written almost as many articles as I've made posts. A 143/160 ratio is nice, eh. --Composure1 04:43, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
I seriously thought WTF when you said you had written 143 articles, then I realised 137 were UnNews. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 06:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey, don't be dissing UnNews! A well written UnNews story is just as good as a well written not-UnNews page. My little UnNews stories come home from school crying their little eyes out everyday because of attitudes like that! "My mainspage page can beat up your UnNews story." the other pages say to them on the playground, and frankly I'm sick of it. "Where are the parents?", I say. But the wind fails to reply. Damn wind. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 06:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I wasn't intending to dis UnNews. It would be amazing if someone wrote 143 mainspace articles though. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 06:18, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
/me helps you up. Sorry. I got a bit heated there. I still have issues from back when people would vote against UnNews on VFH simply because they were UnNews.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 06:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Lo, for Benson has now reached number 2 on the slut list. He is now only one step away from being the most linked user on ALL of Uncyclopedia! --GeneralInsineratehymn 22:11, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
One step... and 1,839 links away. Somehow, I'm not sure even Benson is quite that slutty. Of course, I am almost definitely wrong about that. --»The AcceptableCainad(Fnord) 02:05, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
I don't even want to think about what'll happen when people start comparing edit counts. Will there be an insulting term for a user with a high edit count too? Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 05:11, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
You mean like my 10,766 edits? Bow before my nerdity!--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 05:14, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
"People who don't know how to use the preview button"? •Spang•☃•talk• 05:43, 3 Mar 2007
The weird thing, is they do it at Wikipeida, the place where it shouldn't happen. More and more, I see that Wikipedians really are what we pretend them to be, and the nice people hang out here. That's why I've become an Uncyclopedian full time now (when I'm not working on my own Wiki). --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 06:37, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Yeh, I made one edit one wikipedia (same username, natch) and it was considered was considered prejudicial as "intent to discredit". Pricks. When you get a hold of a brochure of a faith healer promising to heal cancer and AIDS, it's not prejudicial (I don't have to prove that he doesn't do it; he has to prove that he does). Other than that I mostly just hung around the homeopathy talkpage pointing out that anecdotal evidence is not real evidence. But I digress. Y'know, back when I was in gradeschool, "working on my own Wiki" was a euphemism for masturbation. I'm just sayin'.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 07:04, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
At my old school, "I'm just sayin'" was a euphemism for masturbation. As a matter of fact, just about anything was. Especially saying "I digress." My god, I hated middle school... --»The AcceptableCainad(Fnord) 08:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
You got a long way to go before you catch up to us BENSONites, as BENSON is still number two. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 18:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
do you mean benson is number two like, "I just did a benson and it won't flush"? - jack mort |cunt| talk - 20:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Still Alive --Nytrospawn 21:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Words simply cannot convery the honor it is to be Slut # 69. — Lenoxus 23:03, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Still hanging in the top 40, sweet. --Sirgwax (talk) 14:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Sweet, I'm 59. --AAA! (AAAA) 00:04, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
The list will have changed a fair bit since the beginning of March. I might have even squeezed my way into the top 40 by now. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 03:04, 22 March 2007 (UTC)